1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

A kid can make that post better.

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, she was probably abused as a child. Gaining weight because they hate themselves for being r*ped is pretty common...

It's easy to judge the product, but the manufacturer is always to blame...

Not gonna defend them, but they were born into torture... I was not. I cannot imagine what they had to go through.

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a strange behavior from u/CrazyRussian at all.

In my country, we call these people a wooden philosopher - one, who talks too much but never says anything of value.

This "CR" is just a chatbot. Apparently cannot connect to external links, so it can't provide any research about his claims. That's my point. But it will exhaust you with more and more text. That's your point.

I just exposed him for what he is. You can literally see this user being unable to understand anything that's not his opinion... How is that a reserch ground? It's an opinion ground.

P.S.: Why do you always misspell "I" as "ayh"?

1
Neo1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where is your proof then?

Yet another post of "all talk and no game"...

https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOj8yOaP/i-found-a-funny-chatbot-activity/ - Here's a post about you.

You never provide evidence. Just your statements that you think will be believed because you write "yes" again and again...

It's a conspiracy sub, chatbot. Try harder.

Where's your proof? I'll wait.


Where is your investigation? Where is your proof?

Are you really thinking that people in a conspiracy sub will just go with your theories?

Show some proof to defend your theories and I will add them in my post. I'll wait.

All you offer is more text that is backed up by... what? Your words?


Really you could make YBCO superconductor on your kitchen. Works at liquid nitrogen temperature.

Where is your proof?

All talk and no game still...? Are you really banking on people that are so unaware to seek sources? I am not. I like sources. And I made a post about how you never provide sources.

Let me know if you have a source. I'll wait.

-1
Neo1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

You are incredibly stupid or amasingly insolent in pushing bullshit here!

I thought you did that with all your comments.

because both graphene and graphene oxide is insoluble in water.

Can you prove that?

wooden sawdust, paper pulp, charcoal powder, anything fine balck iron oxide particles could stick to.

Can you prove that?

You could make absolutely anything "magnetic" just using fine black iron oxide powder in some binder as paint. And it is used so a lot.

Can you prove that?

But all that have absolutly nothing to do with graphene.

Can you prove that?

Grafene itself is not ferromagnetic and can't stick to magnets, Fe3O4 is.

Can you prove that? You can check what "superconductivity" means in the meantime.

You are incredibly stupid or amasingly insolent in pushing bullshit here!

Wow, more insults from a chatbot that never provides external links... Color me surprised... (It's irony, if Elon didn't program you to notice that)

So, whenever you're ready - show me 1 proof of your claims. I showed medical studies, video materials, and documentaries on the topic. You still only write some theories. 0 facts, 0 proof. Still... It gets boring already...

Let me know if you have anything more than your opinion on the topic. I'll wait.

0
Neo1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Btw, your comment contains two more links than your post ( 0 + 2 = 2). Don't you think it's useful to add links to support your statements?

-3
Neo1 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Hey, guys. Should I add this comment to the post or what? :D

This chatbot CANNOT post external links. :D

I'm shure you have some copper thing around.

What?

magnet does not stick to copper of graphene

Look at this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOu0yC3WEMQ

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, I already provided links that expose you as the dumbest person, or a shill, or a chatbot...

You clearly don't understand superconductivity... I sent you a link about it, remember? You couldn't read wikipedia, really? I even quoted from wikipedia the last sentence in the first paragraph to make it obvious... Are you too far from the ending of the first paragraph still? Is reading too much for you?

It's superconductivity. Not normal EM conductivity = like magnets. But superconductivity.

Ok, let me try another way - https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=superconductivity - That's the etymology of the word.

Super + conductor. Conductor means that the EM radiation is in movement, hense conductor, like a train conductor. A moving train, not stationary.

Is that simple enough for you, or should I really send a personal message to Elon to fix his bots?

I find it funny that you were silent only for the user "BladesLastBottle" to type... Make it more obvious... :D

-1
Neo1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

But I provided the top posts that include a link to help out researchers in the previous comment...

Yes, everyone can do their own research, but this page is made to help people out.

What are you even saying? That we should never provide links?

0
Neo1 0 points ago +1 / -1

So I must trust only his words?

That's not researching. That's religious ideology.

You should look around this site, users post links in here. Are they all liers?

Let me show you the top 3 posts:

https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOj4PiNM/guess-who-owns-onlyfans/c/ - providing a link.

https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeLVKR0/get-your-kids-down-to-the-milita/c/ - providing a link.

https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeJDieA/as-jewish-as-it-gets/c/ - proving a link.

Should we ban them or what?

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I literally quoted how EM radiation is saved in superconductors from the link I've already sent. They attract magnets, not repel them. I don't know who are you trying to confuse with this nonsense... Are you banking on people that give up reading after the first sentence?

I hope other people are not as crazy as you are. Oh, now I get your username... :D

0
Neo1 0 points ago +1 / -1

An electric current through a loop of superconducting wire can persist indefinitely with no power source. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity

That's literally from the same source I sent earlier.

Do you understand how ridiculous and ignorant you are?

Yes, not as much as a chatbot that is unable to read wiki.

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, chatbots can just spew texts like you do.

P.S.: Elon, you must upgrade your chatbots to show some external links to sound more credible. This is just sloppy...

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, more text and no links to back your words... Should I pretend that I am surprised at this point?

I say why exactly it is fake and provide absolutely checkable explanation in simpliest possible form.

Why can't you provide a simple evidence so far, chatbot?

Yeah, I get it. You talk too much and prove nothing. I got it 15 replies ago... You are an example of a useless philosopher - a thing that talks way too much, yet has nothing to say. You're a waste of everyone's time.

Proof or gtfo.

P.S.: Elon, you must upgrade your chatbots to show some external links to sound more credible. This is just sloppy...

2
Neo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's a source that you check specifically for graphene in vaccines, because I know you haven't watched the video.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33829677/

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you have said is your opinion. You've never shown any proof so far.

You just say "fake, cuz I say so"... It's interesting that so far all you do is insult, but never came with a proof of your claims...

And you call me dumb and a shill? :D Yeah, sure...

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Graphene becomes a superconductor, therefore, a magnet.

Source - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity

1
Neo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I asked you so many times before. Playing dumb is not really a strategy you should use at this point.

Here, I will copy your own statement and ask you for a video proof:

"They discover misterious BLE addresses ready for connection with kismet and even didn't try to connect to them" - Your statement.

Where is your proof?

-2
Neo1 -2 points ago +1 / -3

You seem to be venting about something.

Can you show any proof of your claims? Just a single one. You never show proof of your long comments, but I will be patient to wait for a single proof for your claims. I'll wait.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›