You don't need to pay people to riot. Riots naturally occur when large groups of people with high emotions gather together.
I mean, fuck, here in Montreal we rioted: when the Canadians won the cup, when the Canadians lost in the 2nd round, when the Canadians won the first round, during anti-police protests, rioted for schooling.... The list goes on.
There will always be shitty people that want to take advantage of a situation and start violence.
I dunno how anyone is downvoting anything with those tiny little buttons.
...is a big piece of shit and so is this post.
Fucking yawn. I'm so tired of this shit.
Show the fucking proof.
Moar censorship please daddy!
I agree here. The pfizer trials had 6 people out of 45,000 die. 4 of them were in the placebo group. 2 they ruled out the vax (whether anyone believes that or not). Total fear mongering and a completely inorganic conversation IMO.
PLC a leftist. LOL
That's Hillaryess.
Personally I think that it's possible for two separate people to come to the same wrong conclusion without anything paranormal. I spent quite a bit of time in this rabbit hole, hence the name. While the ME is interesting as hell, I truly believe it's a mental thing and we could learn a lot from seeing how people think alike.
Or maybe there's some group consciousness thing going on where we pick up brainwaves from other people like those penis shrinking panics (which is hilarious by the way).
We have so much to learn about the brain and memories that I personally don't think we have to go into a supernatural explanation. Those bears still fuck with me though, but I can pass that off as being a kid and the cursive writing.
Trust sessions.
Q drop #14: Has POTUS ever said anything that didn't turn out to be true?
Kim Jong Il level propaganda in the house. Supreme leader does not lie, he always right.
The 2018 EO allows him to put sanctions on foreign nationals. IT's not some magic martial law bullshit where he just stays in power forever. You've been misled.
But for "things" that were hinted by Q, that were confirmed, the biggest one off the top of my head is John McCain. Q in a less subtler than usual way, hinted that McCain was going to be executed and it will be on the headlines. 30 days later TO THE GODDAMN MINUTE OF THAT Q POST, there was a headline in a big American newspaper claiming McCain was dead.
I always found this utterly idiotic. Does he have psychic powers? Was he predicting the future? Did he know about the exact time of announcement a month before, then posted cryptic bullshit to time it 30 days from an execution? Nevermind the implications of people cheering on secret fucking executions in the conspiracy world.
Completely fucking retarded.
Orion. They said they don't use Solarwinds Orion, which had the vulnerability. Solarwinds have about 100 different IT products. Here's the page that was up:
Notice the serv-u at the bottom.
This is a dead end.
There was a link to their Solarwinds SERV-U page. It's an FTP program. Has nothing to do with Solarwinds Orion. It would be used to transfer large files to and from clients mostly for diagnostic purposes. Any IT proffessional would be able to tell someone the exact same thing. People are conflating two different softwares and trying to link it to the whole election fraud. AKA grasping at straws.
I used the software at my previous company.
This is 100% a dead end and has nothing to do with the election.
You're disingenuous because you're making false accusations, not me. Accuracy is important when we make accusations otherwise it's FUCKING FAKE NEWS GUY. Also, who knows if it's even true because it's a fucking TWEET.
Simple question. Do you love fake news? Because I just corrected fucking OBVIOUS mistake here, even from the mother fucking article. I didn't take a side. I stayed neutral and pointed out a fact. What the fuck is wrong with that?
Do you hate the truth? I'm at a fucking loss for words here. Do you only want to hear about bullshit that validates you even if it's a lie?
Hilarious that I'm downvoted for a correction you acknowledge.
SERIOUSLY, since you haven't answered and I'm pissed now, how the FUCK is pointing out that it's fucking straight up wrong, even from the words the fucking guy posted, that I'm intellectually dishonest for what I said.
PLEASE fucking explain that to me. I'm 100% honest and curious how you could interpret what I said as dishonest.
Educate me asshole. Or are you the dishonest one?
Point out the fucking lie.
You gaslighting motherfuckers are the worst. I am factually correct here by ANY METRIC and you're trying to make me seem like I'm crazy. That's fucking bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit and fuck you.
This free speech thing is great I can finally speak my mind and call out you disingenuous mother fuckers that accuse me of being a shill with no convictions.
Do you have anything to say about what I posted? Is what I said unreasonable? Do we want to start witch hunts over every fucking twitter post on the planet or do we want truth? Maybe a little context? The world is not black and white yet so many people try to see it through those lenses.
Holy shit, the asshole actually put his name on his plane. What a fucking douche nozzle.
What they CLAIM. that's the difference. I saw that post back in the day, I clicked his "app" he made, and got the same AWS CDN IPs that he had in the post. I know I was on an ISP out of Montreal and the IP I got from his app made no sense. Take that for what you will. Whatever he did got the IP of reddits CDN every time because the link was based off where it was posted and he didn't even really understand what he as coding. I've worked in IT 23 years now, call me a shill if you want, believe BS if you want, just giving you a extra thread to tug on here.
How so, is the title true? Or am I correct in saying that it's not his brother in law?
Come on man.
I'm getting downvoted for literally the truth. The guy himself says it's the brother of his brother in law, but says in the title it's his brother in law. AKA misleading. It's not much better to be honest, but there is a difference and when trying to make a point, why be innaccurate?
Just say it's the brother of the brother in law and I'd have no problem with this. Is that so unfair?
Sure, there's a sheet with data. But you have to ask yourself about how it's presented no? Context matters.
There's so many signs, if you want to ignore them that's fine.
It's not satanic, it's their local folklore.
But sure, go ahead and satanic panic it.