He has always responded to emails, but when I sent him one requesting some information about WW2 and a certain event that became illegal to question in his home country last year, nothing. His work has been invaluable, but as he ages, he'll lose his flexibility and become too set in his thoughts, unwilling to question things as he used to.
>IP protocol is basically different
>Basic principles and achieved results are different
>IP add completely new properties and features
What?
You realize the internet has been serviced for the longest time by phone lines?
Why did DARPA create the "internet" when they could already achieve what they want with telegraph/phone lines + satellite comms?
You're only looking at the foundation, not what could be built upon it. And what could be built upon it is hard for us to imagine, and how it simplifies things on their end. The foundation is, of course, going to be at parity with the current tech.
We do this in the software world: rewrite things to make things easier to manage while the first version of the rewritten software is just at parity with the legacy one.
I could imagine that there could be a singe worldwide CBDC with different local names but with shared blockchain, and that was one of my first guesses, but you need a unified world first.
This is one of the biggest reasons, I think. This is their plan for the One World Govt. They've had practice with oil and USD. The world is already unified, they're just erecting the columns, and the first of those is CBDC.
Not everyone agrees, even on "your side". Many would claim to be NatSoc instead, and don't see it as a White-only ideology. Some claim to be White Supremacists. James leans towards Lolbertarianism/Anarchism. He's useful in what he does, and can perhaps be radicalized. Like Molyneux.
You do what you can to the best of your ability and stop expecting others to fix things for you. There are no "heroes."