How many bombs were dropped on Hiroshima? On Nagasaki? What day?

One single firebomb?

Also Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Yep

Well I don't know who these people are, or where the data is coming from yet. That doesn't mean I don't believe them, but I would want to see the information that backs that claim up. I've seen excess death data, but not in how it relates to those who have been vaccinated.

I still don't see how this points to the vaccines being dangerous. If the death/injury rate is small, then it's not dangerous.

Both can be true, yes. Significant can be a relative term. A significant amount of people died in the Vietnam war as well, but since not many died relative to the population of the country, not many people have close ties to the vets KIA.

I think if there was clear data showing that a significant percentage of people have died or been injured who have also been 2+ boosted, that would be a pretty cut and dry piece of evidence. That information is certainly out there, as we are constantly tracking mortality rates, and vaccination status.

If, of the people who have been double boosted, a >99% of the population had gotten no such major side effects or injuries, I would consider it safe for mass deployment.

Which means, of the estimated (supposedly) 5 billion people who have been vaccinated, 10s of millions may very well have gotten side effect and it still be 99% safe. But, that's the firm piece of data we still need

I'll take a look! I've been reading a bit so far, and I find it curious that in the first segment they use EuroMOMO figures to talk about excess deaths, but don't divide them between those who actually got jabbed and those who didn't. Seems like that would be the slam dunk this article should have had in there by this point.

Also, the whole "prediction" thing that got taken down is a little weak.

Well my opinion that, while interesting, my reality hasn't reflected the sort of world they're describing. It's hard to believe what they're saying when what I'm seeing is so different.

Thanks, but I've seen these before. If you don't have the information on hand that's fine.

So that's what I mean when I said that it's based off of your assumption. You don't actually know, you're just guessing based on what you see in the movies.

And you know this because you've worked in government facilities?

Yup! I've ever read through a few of them, but when looking through the backend to see where they sourced their information there was a lot of messiness. I'm not one to follow something that is littered with "sources say" mumbo jumbo. That's gossip at this point.

Wouldnt you like to know what Pfizer wanted to keep secret for 75 years?

Sure! Do you have the results? Because the bad batch website, while useful, was batch specific and a bit tricky to navigate (i ran into a lot of slow loadtimes). I'd be interested to know the overall data.

Again, the whole reason people put their face out there is to make it harder for actual retaliation.

I've been there, thank you

I've seen this site, thank you for sharing! I was always wondering what they meant by "adverse events," because it's not really clear. Feeling sick directly after the shot could be considered an adverse event, as could death. The presentation is a bit archaic so it's hard to tell where the information is.

Does that mean no one died or was wounded in the war?

Nope! But it means the volume of the men who died is low.

If so few people know of loved ones who were killed by the vaccine, then maybe only a small percentage of people died from it.

The whole point being that the government would know everything about these people from the moment they wake up to the moment they go to sleep.

Sounds like a cool idea, but this seems to just be based on your speculation.

But this guy somehow manages to live to tell the truth?

That's the point of going public and outing yourself as a whistleblower. By putting your face out there making this claim, it's harder for someone to kill you for it, because it would immediately be seen as suspicious and, if anything, make that person seem more reliable and open more investigation into his claims

I'm saying based on my direct observances, I've known/seen/met countless people who have been 2+ jabbed who have felt no complications. If all of them got this supposed bioweapon injection, then it seems to be an incredibly weak one.

Does the bioweapon just not affect people in my city?

If the shots were dangerous, do you think the people that pushed them would ever admit to it?

Nope, but I'd bet I'd see a lot of my double + jabbed peers getting hurt, but I don't. They're all continuing to live active lives.

Seems to be pretty weak bioweapons if so many people in my life remain unaffected.

Nope. But even if I were, it doesn't change the fact that I have a significant number of peers in my life who are 2+ jabbed without any complications beyond a week of the sniffles after the jab

Nope

I mean pretty much everyone in my family/friends is double + jabbed, as well as most everyone in my city (I live in a very blue US city). I see a shitload of healthy people, and people who are getting pregnant and having babies

When?