by nds19
2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you find a video of that? I couldnt. If there is audio, I would perhaps suggest that it was planned? Since he would be able to cover for it being the same person .... Radio does that lol

by nds19
2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was co-opted from a young age then. He was originally Bill Hicks from what I have heard - he was then hired by the CIA to become Alex Jones.

He was plastic surgeried and then had his voice box adjusted so he has his 'trademark' voice.

Then he was set to be a radio host (so people wouldn't see him while he recovered from the surgeries)

Once he was healed up and he had a new personality, he was invited to break bohemian Grove.

They needed to avoid the issues with the middle East, so they created the opposite to bill Cooper

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am trying to point out your assumptions are based on shaky ground. You assume that having faith is from lack of logic. When I say, you cannot know God's understanding (ie. why - it is too vast, so you cannot know - thus you either do as you are advised, or you do not, but you cannot know - so you are in need of faith) - Having logic is not a reason to lose faith - it is a reason to have it....

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

You sound very arrogant. You seem to presume to be all knowing? For otherwise, how could consider yourself smart by the standards held to God?

We are given logic so we may learn and function within the laws of the universe. Not to understand the why of it. That requires faith.

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was being pumped on Reddit at the peak. It was blatantly Shiller just in time for the dump

by pkvi
2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cookie clicker irl

by pkvi
2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can we ensure that these are verified? I don't doubt it. But we need verification and frankly. I see a lot of the same pundit style websites and crappy blogs.

I mean really crappy. I host numerous websites a seeing that I can manage to host quite a few paid full domains and a dozen or so free sub domains I expect a certain level of quality.

--

Some of the posts have it, but this one doesn't seem to cut it.

--

Warning. Websites are cheap to host unless you serve lots of media because it's usually the bandwidth or the storage which vets you. If a website has a shit ton of ads for a blog....it's a grift imo...

Sorry. But I don't trust for profit blogs. It's a pandemic and they cannot afford 15/month to spread the truth....they shouldn't host a site then imo.

Beware money making scams on our side too.

by pkvi
5
MindlessRationality 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's per 100k - so while you may be pointing out something. You are wrong in your assertions about Alaska and Montana.

250/100000 is the per capita. Which means that low population will have a high per capita if there are cases as it is a ratio and then they do this by county.

The fact is it is weather dependent and seasonal....just like last year.

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

He paints his nails....perhaps she wants another pre-op in the family?

--

But seriously. He has always instantly given me the creeps. Usually that means the person is straight fucked up. Like evil fucked up.

I would bet he is a straight sociopath who murders animals when he was younger. Straight up scum bag vibes since the first time I saw him. He has a bad vibe

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we not make this into a hate Reddit forum. That's what Reddit is for...

It's trash - this is for conspiracies and sharing information. We don't need to be a place to pump up their shit.

Don't give them the publicity unless it's on topic imho.

by pkvi
1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apologies. You know I thought you meant the seals on the flag - I wasn't paying attention to the podium at the beginning.

by pkvi
2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

This appears to be apperture related. When you have a wide apperture (low f stop) you tend to get a narrow field of view (fov) which results in the background and foreground betting blurred.

There are filters designed to darken the picture so you can open the aperture wider and get a narrow fov.

Source: I used to sell cameras before the smart phones wiped them out

--- here is a good explanation for the foodie's

https://www.chocolatemoosey.com/2012/09/13/understanding-aperture-a-k-a-how-to-make-your-background-blurry/

by pkvi
3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, same. Fuck em that's why. No test. Last test I had was a blood test a few years back before covid.

I haven't had a test but I also had a cold and it was super mild. So definitely not the 'worst cold ever'

by pkvi
3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

May I suggest a slight edit-

Technocratic Biosec Surveillance State

--

Rolls off the tongue better imo 🤷

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I avoided vine because that was also degenerate garbage at the time. People treated it like something religious. If I saw them say vines I knew they were dumb af.

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a known phenomenon that people can also transfer tics to people. Have you ever felt the urge to develop a tic after seeing someone with one. It's worse than just them getting them.

6
MindlessRationality 6 points ago +6 / -0

To use it is to fall victim. It's hard to acknowledge if you are already a victim, but it's not 'resisting' to use it.

To resist is to use a good platform - not the opposition and the enemy tool

--

There is no reason to use it. It will not being truth...that's foolish to think. If you understand how software works you know that it will be misused.

7
MindlessRationality 7 points ago +7 / -0

They shouldn't. It's like whispering to your murderer the passcode to your panic room

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is just fiction which referenced real conspiracies. The film was submitted to a film festival.

If there is any truth, it would be the equivalent of the Bilderberg + Rothschild party kind of stuff.

Apparent there is a club beyond the 300 in Bilderberg so perhaps that was the inspiration

9
MindlessRationality 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why is there history lessons for 6 year olds??

Honestly. I didn't study history until 8-9 years old, until then there are more important things.

Language, spelling, math, counting, colours, reading, and expression, emotion, and basic health like dental / hygiene

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like bongino. He is consistent but fair and while he is a little too Pro Republican sometimes and gets a little partisan, he generally is doing it for his own reasons and beliefs so I can appreciate it

3
MindlessRationality 3 points ago +3 / -0

But why is it now more interesting? I mean I have found nothing 'new' per se for a long time. Most of the information these days is just reposts or secondary regurgitation of the primary source

1
MindlessRationality 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, all opinions are valid. But there are some members who obviously are not interested in having a constructive conversation. Shutting out and making fun are the most common ways of avoid a discussion. If you want to defend and provide useful arguments and sources then by all means hold your opinions as you see fit

2
MindlessRationality 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's fair. If we had a more central way of addressing, I would do so. So please correct me if I am missing such

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›