Good point. The coverage is usually for known shooters from what I see.
Financially, it would be nice if there was at least evidence of maxxed out credit cards and some source of income to account for the amount.
Its hard to save that kind of cash
This series is just one in a long line of (present) Conspiracy commercialization attempts.
Essentially. Make fun of conspiracies for the normies, and try to make money from the Conspiracy theories.
Its shill lite.
Ah yes. It is the hour of the time. Thank you for reminding me.
Do we see parallel rays more often than crepuscular?
Perhaps there is a way it gets distorted in some angles based on weather conditions
While I like the argument. I need one more test to show why I think may be happening.
What If I get refracted parallel rays which then hit a cloud, which is not evenly distributed and that then also refracts the refracted light. (Layers of clouds)
Ie. Can I make a parallel ray appear like a local light source through a type of lense.
If so, when I take that resulting light source, does it create crepuscular rays?
What about the northern sunset at midnight.
I would expect that the sun should not appear that much different in brightness of you are very close to the north pole as the sun should remain the same distance relative you.
I notice that most of the northern sunset stuff is from far from the pole. So it is still possible for their to be slight distortion in colour.
This would suggest that if it is the same all throughout the rotation at the pole, that the globe is at least plausible.
If it is changing colours like it does else where...then it must be flat or at least the sun is smaller and closer than we are told
I am sorry for the name calling, but I find it extremely distressful when someone makes a statement as fact so assuredly but lacking any solid evidence which meets my levels of quality. So it stresses me out seeing someone so confidently state things without backing them up and not being willing to address my concerns without derision.
I see massive flaws in your observations which need to be accounted for in order for them to be as simple as you have claimed.
I have suggested that the simulations and inspiration posters are not the most effective ways of making a statement with the intent of persuading, but rather seems like a self congratulatory back on the back for your own clique.
Does that make sense.
Its not to derail the conversation. Its because I am actual upset by your arguments because they have holes which you haven't addressed.
Namely the simulation, the scale of the globe vs your visible field of view, the altitude measurements and their mechanisms, and raindrops.
Stop saying I believe in the globe. I don't..I don't believe NASA....but they put better effort together than your attempts....
I can poke holes in your logic....it's not airtight ...same with NASA...but at least they offer BS for consumption and you just repost other people's content.
You are appealing to authority as well...
Literally 'type in Google' is an appeal to authority....so is the lack of proof and saying that some explanation is the source of truth but some other explanation is not......why? Says who...ah your authority
https://webglfundamentals.org/webgl/lessons/webgl-3d-perspective.html
You can learn it too and make your fancy animations....but that would likely not help you since you would have to do work....and not just report other people's badly thought out simulation.
Orthographic can be still 3D....and again....this is not raycasting....and no physical simulations
Says the bot who never leaves the server room
Density??? Lmao. Explain or stfu
They are in highschool or just out of it. They cannot reply without getting caught up in different directions about the issues.
/u/axolotl_peyotl - this person is a bot. They cannot possibly be replying to the context of the message. They are regurgitating FE bullshit and providing nothing in the comments
Agreed. Thanks for noticing too
Ignore this confused.person.
She is not smart. She is a bit....of a trend follower....
She posts just regurgitated posts from other people and trys to make it OC but not really....
If you ask for OC or insights....none.
Just 'Google this shit'
Satellites are fake eh....but wireless communications aren't....so what stops satellites?
Ah yes...your nonsequitor bs about gravity ...
Cannot even understand that cables are in addition to.....like fuck chick....
Do you have wifi and LTE on fucking phone??
Cables.....like things aren't all running wirelessly...
You....don't even know how 3D graphics work...but you trust them?
So fucking stupid
I can code my own simulation and it won't like your stupid video...it will be a lot more like the right video....because....that's how perspective in 3D graphics works...
How do you think it draws......
Huh?...well let me tell you....it's not a single way....omg!!!!
You set up different perspectives... different parameters...and make it do weird sht.....
Like time rotations....
Oh but you trust a 3D image you cannot even make yourself.....dumbass.
Just to make you struggle and I want to see it....if that simulation you posted.....
Is it RAY CASTED??? Or....not?
Stfu... You dumb fuck.
Don't be disingenuous to me you fuck....
I haven't said a fucking you just regurgitated from your wet sack of fat....
In fact... I have the only fucking example experiment that is simple, doesnt need some fucking camera to do....and can be done at any fuxki g scale.... You are a fucking idiot....determined....and sure of yourself...but not any more prepared to provide proof. You didn't even acknowledge my experiment...
Any holes in my idea...or you are so sure you don't need to repeat experience...because....your memories are golden ...
Observe the free fall in atmosphere....map that shit out.....deal the fucking density if you must....but make the fucking math work you idiot....or don't have proof...you have conjecture.....
Dumb fuxks like you make flat earth look stupid.....not me...I am willing to jump to first fucking ship that can fucking port....but you have no ship to port and yet have renounced another imaginary ship....
That simulation is not accurate at all.....
He doesn't have the camera setup properly for perspective.....he needs to make a globe with a max draw distance and relative scale to the projection.....
That balloon is monstrously large.
I have done work with 3D graphics programming....you need to make it modelled correctly.... I can make impossible things happen in renderings...
Yeah great...but then how do I measure it....
I have stated quite concisely why I cannot.....and let me just say it so it's said....not being able to debunk something means more about the person than it does about the debunk or the proof.....
Someone....could fail to debunk something....because they do not possess the knowledge...not because it's no debunkable....your appealing to an imaginary authority (your own fallable logic)
You haven't proven anything...not to anyone but your own opinions....not logically either....just through belief.....
You replaced one belief with another....not the absence of belief lol.
You believe your equipment is accurate....but why should it? It uses electronics which depend on Maxwell's equations which depends on Newton ultimately....
So why does one set of math work, but the others are not qualified....
No offense....but I have yet to see any one provide anything but a reductive argument.....and reduction is not proof ..... Its based on.... ASSUMPTIONS
Not necessarily. Perspective also works against the argument for the same reason.
You would need to be sufficiently far away from the earth relative to the size of both you and the earth to see such a drop off.
So again, altitude becomes the question.
How do I know your balloon footage is actually that high....what if it's not?
I get it looks high.....but again....we have amazing cgi today. So making a grainy footage video of a spinning camera is not the best tbf.
Again. I am skeptical, but on both sides.
I would love to see some real proof on either side that I can myself confirm but I also do not know a way to reliably determine the altitude....
Do you all take turns??? You and a couple others suddenly started posted all of a sudden. But.....you haven't brought anything new to the table except claiming anyone who doesn't blindly agreed with you is a globe believing person.
Images of the earth are fake yes. But fake images are not proof.....
I have you an actual experiment to do....how about it eh?
Wanna actually do something. Run my experiment
No ... Not quite.
More like.....get ahold of as much Bitcoin and tank it after the sells....then collect from criminals....then rince repeat.....so that they can provide.....CBDCs....