2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 0.01% of germs are afraid of contracting stupidity from you.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

but there is no evidence

A quick look at you replies and turns out this is your favorite phrase "there is no evidence". I could say the same thing about everything you claim it's factual. Nothing stops me from doing so.

"The Complete Ethiopian Bible has no missing books. No Western edits. Just the most complete collection of sacred texts ever made available in English, including 88 printed scriptures and 1,212 apocryphal works hidden for centuries.". The Complete Ethiopian Bible (50% OFF) is in sale now and you can buy it for $4.90

only books that survived the testing of centuries by the covenant community were the fully inspired ones

In other words, the Empire has approved.

"Biblical Christianity" means any denomination of Christianity

So, you and guywholikesDjtof2024 are one and the same. Same person, or same team that is.

We practice unity in essentials, liberty in nonessentials, and charity in all.

Who else on this platform is part of your team?

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of the Bible is correct.

Which Bible? the Bible before 1684 contained 80 books and current editions only have 66, and we have to wonder what exact purpose the removal of 14 books would serve if what you're saying "all of it is correct"?

Biblical Christianity.

What does that exactly mean? which denomination: Catholicism, Protestant, Anglican/Episcopal, Assembly of God, Lutheran, Methodist or Pentecostal.

But the concept of emanation changes everything - Too bad it's factually untrue and has holes and can't be backed as solidly as the Bible.

Would you mind listing these holes.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd agree with you that more Christians should accept Paul's quotation of Epimenides that in him we live and move and are. That's a panentheism that is personal rather than the impersonal version usually proposed. There is no separation but Creator and creature are connected on every level.

I'll ask you the same question, you seem to be a religious person, do you follow Judaism, Christianity or both?

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assuming that is true, God still did create us. Atheists are still wrong... So you agree. Ok.

I don't know what you want me to agree to. You seem to be a religious person, do you follow Judaism, Christianity or both? I'm not an atheist, but I could have a different view than you when it comes to Creation. Let me ask you something... what if the world we live in today is not the actual creation of a supreme God, but it is a counterfeit creation instead. By a lesser God.

The biblical model you talk about presents creation as divine command. God speaks. Reality obeys. End of story. But what if there is something far more profound and threatening to orthodox control. What if the world was not created through command? What if it emanates reality the way fire radiates heat naturally, continuously without effort or decision? This distinction between emanation and creation completely overturns everything you've been taught about the relationship between divine consciousness and physical reality. In the biblical framework, there's a clear separation. God creates, humanity obeys. The creator remains forever separate from the created, maintaining absolute authority over subjects who can never bridge that gap. But the concept of emanation changes everything.

Think of it as an infinite wellspring that naturally overflows, not because it decides to and then stops, but because abundance is its very nature. Just as the sun doesn't choose to shine, it simply radiates light as an expression of what it is. What if Creation continuously expresses itself through successive levels of reality. Each level emerges from the previous one, carrying the essence of the source while manifesting new aspects of infinite consciousness. And what if we choose to ignore everything I have just said, and instead we are happy living in a simulation? this is what I meant by "And with our minds we create our own universe". Some would say we are prisoners of our own mind, which is actually the same thing.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +4 / -2

Handshake interacts with known bot user

I get you like to speak in codes, but why reply to my message? I have no idea what you're saying. I thought you were the only "bot user" on this platform, you mean there's someone else?

1
LilyThread 1 point ago +1 / -0

controlled by jews

Satan runs the world through his minions, the jews (so called "the chosen people"), using duality. A world based on friction, positive and negative[both negative], light and dark[both dark], predator and prey, good and evil[both evil], Democrats and Republicans[uniparty]. This world is not the real thing but a simulation.

0
LilyThread 0 points ago +1 / -1

God made the first humans. Blind chance did not.

Not exactly clear. The Bible contains two creation stories. They are found in chapters 1 and 2 of the Book of Genesis. The two stories are not saying the “same thing.” They are two distinct stories of creation, both in terms of content and order. They cannot be harmonized. You don't believe me? maybe you can believe David Bokovoy. He holds a PhD in Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East and an MA in Jewish Studies both from Brandeis University. Here is a link to an article he wrote: https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/the-two-creations-in-genesis/

By this logic Kant's theory is created by us. It is self refuting.

I suggest we don't discuss Kant any longer. Like I said "if it makes sense", obviously it doesn't.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

As you can see, he has downvoted this reply and ran away

Sorry, I don't see that. How do you know when someone upvotes or downvotes a post? and what difference does it make anyway.

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think I know who JG5 is now. TalestSkil has provided the clue.

JG5 alt

For a while I thought most of the people on this platform speak in codes. Maybe not all, but certainly you do. And why would choose a name like Dresden Firebomber? do you have something against Germans?

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

As I said, God made the universe. Why do you shrink back from this issue?

I'm not sure what you mean. Which God? is it a religious aspect you're trying to discuss?

So you mean if I think about a dragon a dragon will materialize and burn someone's house down?

No, but this is very funny. Kant's theory of the world is this: we are all endowed with the capacity to reason. And it's born in us. We don't learn it. It is just part of who we are. And then this reason interacts with reality, the things in themselves and then what we see is the appearance. So the crucial argument that Khat is making is we imagine reality around us by bringing in space and time. Reality we do not see is objective reality or away from us. We see reality as part of us. And with our minds we create our own universe. This has been confirmed by neuroscience, by artificial intelligence and micro mechanics. It's really the dominant understanding of human psychology we have today.

Hope this is clear. I could go deeper into this, if it makes sense. Kant is regarded as one of the most important thinkers of modern Europe, and his influence on Western thought is immeasurable. He has pioneered Transcendental idealism and the Categorical imperative. He wrote the Critique of Pure Reason, his best-known work.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why can't both be true?

How do we know if reality exists or not? It's entirely possible that we are in a computer simulation. How do ideas come together? Where does knowledge come from?

Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of active subjectivity. Active subjectivity is the idea that we are not just passive consumers of information. We actively participate in reality. We imagine reality in a way that allows us to understand it.

1
LilyThread 1 point ago +2 / -1

So, what's true in your opinion? are we living in a real world, or are we in a computer simulation?

4
LilyThread 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump only cares about Trump, and has no real ideology beyond that

Many people have said in the past, and you and they are not wrong. IMO, Trump is an actor and was tasked to play a specific role. That probably includes being a "false savior", but a lot more. That's the price you have to pay for making a deal with the devil.

Trump was bailed out by Rothschild Inc. back in 1980s when he was bankrupt. That's the first time I see Trump and the Rothschilds coming together. Wilbur Ross was appointed as head of the Rothschild Inc.’s bankruptcy advising team. Same Wilbur Ross who before the year 2000 was working for the Rothschilds. Wilbur Ross became his handler during the first term.

Now in his second turn in the WH Trump has a new handler, Howard Lutnick. Who was once a neighbor of the deceased criminal named Jeffrey Epstein. Did you know Lutnick and Epstein lived on the same street at number 9 and 11 respectively. What are the odds? Let me add Lutnick was given the position of Secretary of Commerce in Trump's administration. Same as Wilbur Ross in 2017. Now, you connect the dots.

5
LilyThread 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump could not care less about Israel

Really? then why work hard & study Kabbalah? “One day, when my Kabbalah teacher, Eitan Yardeni, asked how I was doing...”

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

My theory is that Matthew's first draft

Who is Matthew? and according to you he wrote the gospel in both Aramaic, the Greek. That means he was able to speak and write-in both languages. A quick search and I came up with somewhere around 70 CE when the Gospel according to Mathew was written. Why was this gospel written so late?

the language the others used because it circulated faster

Who are the others? I knew Jesus was able to speak both Aramaic and Greek, plus Hebrew. So Jesus was trilingual. But, I thought none, with two exceptions, of his disciples were able to speak Greek. Let alone write in Greek. Two of Jesus' disciples, Andrew and Philip, had Greek names, so perhaps they were able to speak to the crowds in Greek. But there is no evidence they were able to write in Greek. At least I wasn't able to find any historical evidence.

2
LilyThread 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why declare war on a dying entity. Just a bit more pressure and witness its end. Trump will buy Greenland just like in 1917 US bought Epstein Island also from Denmark.

In 1917 US acquired Virgin Islands from Denmark, consisting of 3 large islands, as well as many smaller islets and reefs. One of them was a small island called Little Saint James. Jeffrey Epstein bough it in 1997 for approx. $11 million.

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

They all love Israel. And there is a reason. The World is no longer American. Empires used to rule through armies, territory, and conquest. Not any longer, now Israel rules through leverage, institutions, surveillance, and proxy control. Welcome to the Zionist World Order (ZWO).

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course. Zion like in the movie, where the city of Zion represents all those who have taken the red pill and are awakened to the fact that the Matrix controls them all. For a moment I thought you were talking about the Protocols of Zion.

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

they should learn and use the original Biblical languages themselves

I agree with your statement. But, how do you know which is the original language? for instance what was the NT written in? which language?

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the real Zion

What's the real Zion? and is there such thing as the fake Zion?

3
LilyThread 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some people think flat earth is Biblical, which it is not... Christianity is true

Again why does it matter? Show me one place in the Bible or any other religious manuscript where Jesus spoke of the shape of the place he and his disciples lived on.

My opinion, Jesus was concerned with the spiritual realm, not the material world we live in. Flat Earth, Global Earth or in-between... that's been introduced by institutions as a distraction, to keep us busy. You speak of Christianity, let me tell you something. Every single word you've read in the Bible is a translation. And every translation is an interpretation. Which means every sermon you've ever heard, every verse you've memorized, every doctrine that's shaped your faith, all of it has been filtered through languages Jesus never spoke, translated by scholars with agendas you've never questioned and packaged into a version of Christianity that would be unrecognizable to the man who started it all.

view more: Next ›