They finally stopped running this psyop but here were the purposes of them. If they had succeeded, it would have made all our lives much harder because everyone would think of us as dumb ass flat earthers.
-
If people think of us as dumb flat earthers, they would not believe them when we tell them the Gov is involved in conspiracy against the People.
-
Deep State live underground in caverns. They don't want us to know there are good and bad civilizations in inner Earth. The bad ones are Reptilians running very evil and Satanic things underground. The good ones are good people who are so advanced, they were just waiting for us to catch up to the civilized level and we are there now so they want to connect.
-
The more bs people believe in, the harder life gets and they want us to have a hard life.
I don't know what you want me to agree to. You seem to be a religious person, do you follow Judaism, Christianity or both? I'm not an atheist, but I could have a different view than you when it comes to Creation. Let me ask you something... what if the world we live in today is not the actual creation of a supreme God, but it is a counterfeit creation instead. By a lesser God.
The biblical model you talk about presents creation as divine command. God speaks. Reality obeys. End of story. But what if there is something far more profound and threatening to orthodox control. What if the world was not created through command? What if it emanates reality the way fire radiates heat naturally, continuously without effort or decision? This distinction between emanation and creation completely overturns everything you've been taught about the relationship between divine consciousness and physical reality. In the biblical framework, there's a clear separation. God creates, humanity obeys. The creator remains forever separate from the created, maintaining absolute authority over subjects who can never bridge that gap. But the concept of emanation changes everything.
Think of it as an infinite wellspring that naturally overflows, not because it decides to and then stops, but because abundance is its very nature. Just as the sun doesn't choose to shine, it simply radiates light as an expression of what it is. What if Creation continuously expresses itself through successive levels of reality. Each level emerges from the previous one, carrying the essence of the source while manifesting new aspects of infinite consciousness. And what if we choose to ignore everything I have just said, and instead we are happy living in a simulation? this is what I meant by "And with our minds we create our own universe". Some would say we are prisoners of our own mind, which is actually the same thing.
God exists.
All of the Bible is correct. We either know parts of it are true or we don't know (besides that the Bible said it) how or why they are true of false, but we definitely know none of it got anything wrong. Fact: Science keeps catching up to the Bible. Over and over.
Jesus died bodily and rose on the third day.
Faith is God's free Gift, and Faith saves. We can't work for salvation like some employee grinding at a job for money. Works salvation is depressing and false. Ask God for Faith if you haven't!
The earth being ~6K years old.
God really did make the universe in 6 days just like the Bible says.
All organisms exist because of being born from the organism of their kind, not because of being the evolved descendants of some germs on rocks.
God made life, it didn't and couldn't happen naturally.
Everyone has one. Unless they're babies or something. Everyone puts something first.
Biblical Christianity.
Anyone could.
Ask away. Truth invites questions. Charlie Kirk was asked many of them.
That has less evidence for it than the real truth.
How is that theory "profound" at all? Oh wow, wow we were made by a cheap Temu "god" instead of the Biblical God!!. Nope, that actually cheapens Creation and undermines our value. Implies evil and death are normal, and not aberrations caused by human sin. And what does it threaten, other than the person believing it?
I'm not Orthodox nor catholic.
So you're just trying to claim the Creation is eternal, which is logically impossible and which proves Romans 1:20-25 right. "Believe and serve everything and anything and anyone BUT the Biblical God!!" is how humanity has operated since after Adam and Eve rebelled. Thank God for saving at least some of us! And your theory implies the Bible is wrong.
And if your theory were true, we should be seeing matter being created, not conserved.
Too bad it's factually untrue and has holes and can't be backed as solidly as the Bible.
That's about being content then. Nothing is being created. If you are content to eat ice cream, you're not creating ice cream.
And nothing is being made, in fact we are just keeping ourselves locked. If you put a chain on yourself, you're not generating the chain. It already existed.
Which Bible? the Bible before 1684 contained 80 books and current editions only have 66, and we have to wonder what exact purpose the removal of 14 books would serve if what you're saying "all of it is correct"?
What does that exactly mean? which denomination: Catholicism, Protestant, Anglican/Episcopal, Assembly of God, Lutheran, Methodist or Pentecostal.
Would you mind listing these holes.
PMFJI: Since 367, Christians have agreed that there are 66 protocanonical books with full inspiration and that there are many supplemental books that are also useful. Ever since oral tradition was first transmitted millennia before, there was always a recognition of the difference between inspired tradition and contextual commentary; this difference was manifested in the difference between the Law of Moses and the ongoing "living-oracles" application of it by covenant communities; it became clearly manifest when the Greek books ("OT Apocrypha") began circulating alongside the Hebrew books, at which time the Jewish tradition was that those books that hadn't (yet) been received by the community as having full authority were of a secondary level; and the Christian practice followed the same procedure, allowing the secondary books (including "NT Apocrypha") to remain but without recognizing them as having the full inspiration of the protocanon. It was only at the Council of Trent (1540s-1560s) that the deuterocanon was defined for the West (not the full 80), and I don't know when the larger Orthodox canon was defined for the East, or the slightly larger Ethiopian canon was defined; but all of these continued the millennia-old recognition that only books that survived the testing of centuries by the covenant community were the fully inspired ones.
Protestants agreed with keeping the deuterocanon until the Revised Version controversy of the 19th century, at which point many texts from the protocanon were attacked and over time the entire deuterocanon was stripped away. Protestants recognized they could still survive without any Apocrypha, and Catholic and Orthodox continued their previous policy unchanged.
Your article uses the year 1684 as part of a theory that something was done for removal in that year but there is no evidence of anything significant happening in that year. I trust you're interested in facts here rather than fact-free imaginative narratives, right?
"Biblical Christianity" means any denomination of Christianity that lives up to its goal of using the Bible alone (transcribed and translated) as God's revealed written message. We practice unity in essentials, liberty in nonessentials, and charity in all.
I'll be happy to talk emanation with you in more detail if someone puts specifics forward. Generically, "emanation" is not a true or false concept in itself, it's how the concept is used to define realities that matters. "Emanat" appears in the Vulgate of James 3:11, translating "bryo" meaning "send forth" or "gush", which is related to "embryo".
A quick look at you replies and turns out this is your favorite phrase "there is no evidence". I could say the same thing about everything you claim it's factual. Nothing stops me from doing so.
"The Complete Ethiopian Bible has no missing books. No Western edits. Just the most complete collection of sacred texts ever made available in English, including 88 printed scriptures and 1,212 apocryphal works hidden for centuries.". The Complete Ethiopian Bible (50% OFF) is in sale now and you can buy it for $4.90
In other words, the Empire has approved.
So, you and guywholikesDjtof2024 are one and the same. Same person, or same team that is.
Who else on this platform is part of your team?
Been proposed variously by gnostics. In other posts here I've pointed out they only do that because they don't see the current creation as good because they don't understand it's good for creatures to have limited free will to good or evil. I can explain this at any length desired (and I get accused of doing so).
Looks the same to me, honestly. In the spiritual level, to command is to emanate. When I write a book, it would be equivalent to say I emanate the universe or I command the universe.
If you'd like to remove consciousness from the creator so as to "get him off the hook" for allowing evil, the problems are that most gnostic systems admit the central Monad is Consciousness, and that human consciousness had to come from somewhere. We are not the highest consciousness and we have a duty to find out what that is, because it is also the source of right and wrong.
If you'd like to remove "separation" from Christianity, I'd agree with you that more Christians should accept Paul's quotation of Epimenides that in him we live and move and are. That's a panentheism that is personal rather than the impersonal version usually proposed. There is no separation but Creator and creature are connected on every level.
You are right that providence is ongoing creation, that creation should not be regarded as ended. I don't see a need for successive levels of reality as they are undocumented and unexperienced, and tend to separate humanity from the Monad. The reality I live in is one, it can be conceived of as both reality and simulation at once. My experience of it is imperfect, but in itself it is perfect and needs no layering (though it does have differentiation among realms). I grow in experiencing all its realms and aspects, refining my experience as I go, and I am always happy for what is being revealed and poured into experience, while always patiently awaiting what more is to come. It sounds like your concern is for people who fail to see that more is coming or who fail habitually to interact with the moment. Those are valid concerns but might be more directly stated. I trust this is helpful.
I'll ask you the same question, you seem to be a religious person, do you follow Judaism, Christianity or both?
SwampRangers is a jew.
I'm a Christian, I've given my life to Jesus, so I don't manage it anymore, he does. He leads me through the whole Bible and in particular I've learned a lot about the Hebrew roots (even though there is much misunderstood there too). There are quite a few here though who take gnostic approaches and I interact with all of them who are willing.
Suuure
That's why you host c/Porno and c/Satanism, for Jesus 🤣