I dont think money was their motive - I think the family helped him escape, because he is their son, and Gabby is already dead - if I was in their place, Im not sure I wouldnt do the same for my own child, even though its wrong regarding getting justice and closure for Gabbys family
he has flat out said Brian ISNT dead.
Im not convinced either way, I mean, the remains COULD be him, all I did was point out all the odd an bizarre circumstances around the supposed remains "find".
The "remains" was just "skeletal" and "dental"? Where is the rest of the body? The "skeleton" apparently means a skull, because the ME said it has a gunshot wound, but there is no gun? Who is the dentist who "verified the dental records"? Dog said the dentist is Brians uncle. Is that accurate? The ME statement had said DNA testing was performed. On what? Was it on bone marrow? Using which skeletal bones? What exactly were the lab results, where is that report? Because THAT is the only way to actually confirm these remains are of a deceased Brian.
Why and how did the parent lead LE to the "remains" directly, in a 5 mile wide nature preserve that had been just searched 3 days prior with no result?
So I just asked these questions, which to me seem logical. I want the remains to be his as well, I just asked questions. And I get the barrage of shill attacks and bannings on reddit that always mean one thing and one thing only - that the narrative is exactly that. Why does there need to be a narrative? Only when the truth is the opposite.
Everyone knows this (or should, by now).
criticism I welcome, I want to be wrong. Silencing me isnt criticism, its confirming my suspicions.
All I did was post how it added up (or failed to).
Just my own opinion. The family didnt seem at all broken up about him disappearing, and the parents led them right to his supposed remains in a giant 5 mile nature preserve area, even though that same spot had been searched 3 days before.
There was no body, just some "skeletal and dental" remains. And no gun. The dentist who corroborated the dental remains to Brians records was HIS UNCLE. Other people have pointed this out, like Dog the Bounty Hunter, who was actually in FL looking for the dude for a while and so knows some info about the case. As anyone who has worked in the medical fields knows, it is trivial to procure a skull with a bullet hole in it of whatever sex/age/size you want.
So Im not saying there is any hard evidence of this or that being done, Im just saying the evidence for the official narrative is a little silly, its essentially phony baloney.
Now, if the agency that did the DNA tests (which has been claimed was done) can publish the test details, and they used DNA of marrow from a large bone (that he couldnt live without), then I would be happy to say yea, case closed.
But look at how my comments and posts were treated just for bringing up this shit. That says it all.
No WAY is this guy dead.
He fled, his family helped him, his uncle (a dentist) "verified" his dental records, and the family procured some cadaverous skull that had a bullet wound (likely of the same gender and general size) - which the family then planted.
I would almost buy the official story from the media and family attorney, but then when I try to post my ( I think legitimate) questions about how this doesnt seem to add up on Reddit, I literally get banned on /r/gabbyPetito after a veritable shillfest of hate (from the usual shill army of 30 day old redditors with 2 dozen comments ONLY in that sub pushing the same exact message), and when I post on /conspiracy there, I get shadowbanned.
Obviously, as we all know by now, when the machine goes into overdrive to protect the narrative that means the opposite of that narrative is the truth.
Just for the fun of it Im gonna post a link to this comment to modmail for /r/GabbyPetito just so I know they will seethe about being powerless to do anything about it LOL
there WAS no body.
there were skeletal remains, which was later said to simply be a skull with a bullet hole in it. There were some teeth. The fact that there was nO BODY aside from that is suspect enough in itself. And there WAS no conclusive autopsy, how could there be? There was no body. There was no gun, either.
So what there WAS was some teeth and a skull with a bullet hole in it.
Like I said, if some ME or agency affiliated with the coroners office can publish a lab report of DNA matching from Brians verified belongings and some of the skeleton that would confirm a deceased body (like marrow from a large bone he couldnt live without), then fine, I agree, thats him - but thats a long way from what has been presented at all.
To me, whats been verified to me screams planted evidence and covered up escape, but maybe thats just me.