Now this is a weird conspiracy
(nypost.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
All I did was post how it added up (or failed to).
Just my own opinion. The family didnt seem at all broken up about him disappearing, and the parents led them right to his supposed remains in a giant 5 mile nature preserve area, even though that same spot had been searched 3 days before.
There was no body, just some "skeletal and dental" remains. And no gun. The dentist who corroborated the dental remains to Brians records was HIS UNCLE. Other people have pointed this out, like Dog the Bounty Hunter, who was actually in FL looking for the dude for a while and so knows some info about the case. As anyone who has worked in the medical fields knows, it is trivial to procure a skull with a bullet hole in it of whatever sex/age/size you want.
So Im not saying there is any hard evidence of this or that being done, Im just saying the evidence for the official narrative is a little silly, its essentially phony baloney.
Now, if the agency that did the DNA tests (which has been claimed was done) can publish the test details, and they used DNA of marrow from a large bone (that he couldnt live without), then I would be happy to say yea, case closed.
But look at how my comments and posts were treated just for bringing up this shit. That says it all.
I saw Dog the Bounty Hunter on Fox asked about this, he seemed uncommitted to Brian actually being dead.
he has flat out said Brian ISNT dead.
Im not convinced either way, I mean, the remains COULD be him, all I did was point out all the odd an bizarre circumstances around the supposed remains "find".
The "remains" was just "skeletal" and "dental"? Where is the rest of the body? The "skeleton" apparently means a skull, because the ME said it has a gunshot wound, but there is no gun? Who is the dentist who "verified the dental records"? Dog said the dentist is Brians uncle. Is that accurate? The ME statement had said DNA testing was performed. On what? Was it on bone marrow? Using which skeletal bones? What exactly were the lab results, where is that report? Because THAT is the only way to actually confirm these remains are of a deceased Brian.
Why and how did the parent lead LE to the "remains" directly, in a 5 mile wide nature preserve that had been just searched 3 days prior with no result?
So I just asked these questions, which to me seem logical. I want the remains to be his as well, I just asked questions. And I get the barrage of shill attacks and bannings on reddit that always mean one thing and one thing only - that the narrative is exactly that. Why does there need to be a narrative? Only when the truth is the opposite.
Everyone knows this (or should, by now).
Someone should keep an eye on his family getting unexpected money. That seems to be the MO of these people, kill, threaten and pay-off.
I dont think money was their motive - I think the family helped him escape, because he is their son, and Gabby is already dead - if I was in their place, Im not sure I wouldnt do the same for my own child, even though its wrong regarding getting justice and closure for Gabbys family
💙💙💙
By your logic if nobody had any criticism of your idea then it would be flat out wrong. Am I doing this correctly?
👍👍👍
criticism I welcome, I want to be wrong. Silencing me isnt criticism, its confirming my suspicions.