Now this is a weird conspiracy
(nypost.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
he has flat out said Brian ISNT dead.
Im not convinced either way, I mean, the remains COULD be him, all I did was point out all the odd an bizarre circumstances around the supposed remains "find".
The "remains" was just "skeletal" and "dental"? Where is the rest of the body? The "skeleton" apparently means a skull, because the ME said it has a gunshot wound, but there is no gun? Who is the dentist who "verified the dental records"? Dog said the dentist is Brians uncle. Is that accurate? The ME statement had said DNA testing was performed. On what? Was it on bone marrow? Using which skeletal bones? What exactly were the lab results, where is that report? Because THAT is the only way to actually confirm these remains are of a deceased Brian.
Why and how did the parent lead LE to the "remains" directly, in a 5 mile wide nature preserve that had been just searched 3 days prior with no result?
So I just asked these questions, which to me seem logical. I want the remains to be his as well, I just asked questions. And I get the barrage of shill attacks and bannings on reddit that always mean one thing and one thing only - that the narrative is exactly that. Why does there need to be a narrative? Only when the truth is the opposite.
Everyone knows this (or should, by now).
Someone should keep an eye on his family getting unexpected money. That seems to be the MO of these people, kill, threaten and pay-off.
I dont think money was their motive - I think the family helped him escape, because he is their son, and Gabby is already dead - if I was in their place, Im not sure I wouldnt do the same for my own child, even though its wrong regarding getting justice and closure for Gabbys family
If it is someone else whose body was dumped there, right where the family said to look, then fake autopsy to say it was Brian, then one of his family is really the coroner, then maybe he could have dumped a John Doe out there as well as faking the autopsy. With the family motive of helping Brian...
I still think it could be that a third party killed Gabby and later killed Brian.
there WAS no body.
there were skeletal remains, which was later said to simply be a skull with a bullet hole in it. There were some teeth. The fact that there was nO BODY aside from that is suspect enough in itself. And there WAS no conclusive autopsy, how could there be? There was no body. There was no gun, either.
So what there WAS was some teeth and a skull with a bullet hole in it.
Like I said, if some ME or agency affiliated with the coroners office can publish a lab report of DNA matching from Brians verified belongings and some of the skeleton that would confirm a deceased body (like marrow from a large bone he couldnt live without), then fine, I agree, thats him - but thats a long way from what has been presented at all.
To me, whats been verified to me screams planted evidence and covered up escape, but maybe thats just me.