This is two photos and both show it already built. So, sorry, fail
This is just wierd logic. The entire argument hangs on the meaning of the word tartar according to which language I don't know. It's silly that you can use that for some kind of connection with this theory must be debunked
Geocentric of heliocentric?
I find it hilarious that every Foucault's pendulum needs a person to start it. And then it keeps going, and somehow this proves the earth is a ball.
How, exactly explain, does this mean the earth is moving? It's just a huge jump to conclusion without any logic.
All the cranes in the world, none of them automatically become a pendulum when they are turned off. Just hanging still.
Foucault's pendulum is a phenomenon, but I don't need to connect that phenomenon to the debate. The earth doesn't curve, by all observations and measurements. So, this pendulum moving constantly doesn't address the missing curve, or many other inconsistencies in the globe and space theories.
It's ok that I cannot explain how the pendulum works, we can all have theories about why it works, and none of those theories need to be "because the earth is moving"
Again, if it was because of the earth, then why does someone need to start the pendulum? Why doesn't it just start by itself?
It could be the material, maybe if the pendulum was a heavy plastic ball, then this wouldn't work, this, we might conclude that this has something to do with electro statics, which is a relatively strong force that we can measure.
So, I think it's fair to say that I have debunked Foucault's pendulum as a method to prove the earth is moving, just now.
But let's hear your thoughts. How does this pendulum prove the earth is in motion?
If we are rotating at a constant velocity and also have orbital velocity, then why could we not measure any acceleration and deceleration? Do a velocity diagram of earth rotating and moving forward at the same time. The surface of the earth would experience increased velocity while rotating with orbit and decreased velocity while rotating against orbit.
Without forcing your beliefs that we are on a globe in space, how do you explain this?
If we understand what medicine really is, you would understand to never go to a doctor unless it's for a broken bone, stitches, gunshot.
Stay healthy by not eating veggies or following any advice from those fucking brainwashed idiots
What does the CIA call Americans who knows all viruses are bullshit?
It's just motional force. Nothing crazy. Acceleration and centrific forces are overpowering boyancy and electrostatics forces. It's just math.
Gravity is totally waste of brain power. It's not needed for any calculation in physics. Gravity is just acceleration, that's all. It's not a force, it's not a constant even. It's just an agreed upon average acceleration.
All of astrophysics is pseudoscience based on horribly weak fundamentals of this earth and sun.
Here comes the bots and globe saviors to tell me FE is a psy op and it's not worth learning. They're right, FE is a psy op, that hides the truth that earth is not a globe. And it's flat and stationary.
But first you have to think for yourself, and figure out why gravity is such a hoax.
You're so gullible. You believe the scam that FE is a psy op. All they had to do was put up a bunch of religoous fake FE garbage and you bought it, hook, line a sinker.
You'll now never even try to think about what I mean when I say there is no measureable curve. And no measureable movement. You are programmed to respond with "it's a big planet..." Of "you can't feel anything because we are already moving"
And never take into account the laws of constant velocity, or understand how optical perspective works, or beer law.
People who reject flat earth without even understanding the actual arguments are lazy and ignorant
Magnetic reversal...I'm unconvinced it has ever happened. Yes, I've dug deep on the topic, no, it's not a strong argument because it all assumes the earth is a globe. Flawed from the start
Saw an image showing that it's an island. Not sure if that's true. Circumnavigations have reported time and distance inconsistent with Antarctica being an island. However, there is too much psy op out there to tell for sure.
All the moon landings are fake no one's ever been to the moon. I hope you realize that
It's a psy op, so ya. You also probably haven't gone a single day without seeing the globe hoax
Gotta spread their holohoax
No one has ever died from a virus
Noble prize is still a rigged POS
What the pigs do on the farm is inconsequential when it's time for the culling.
I don't know I spoke to it and was very close to White South Africans that lived through the '80s and '90s and they said that it wasn't nearly that bad as everyone claims.
I'm inclined to believe him because I knew him really closely And yeah of course there was some atrocities here and there but It wasn't widespread genocide or slavery.
The reason none of this makes sense is because it's all political theater. You don't live in a real world that actually is controlled by politicians. Even Israel isn't at the top there's something even higher and it's not the devil or God or any of that s***
And nothing happened. 😂
No one here wears a mask
It was no secret then just like it's no secret now yet many people will never believe this because they have to be told by the people they trust
Needs subtitles, sound quality sounds like teen spirit
Ok, well, I think most people aren't gonna kill cops. The you know whews will probably send brainwashed children to take the gun. Most of our civilian army will be lost without a fight. Then, they will stop you with little more than a squeek.
The illusion of power is the second amendment. You don't have power against the government. You never did and never will. This isn't our world, we were imported and grown like pigs.
I'm still seeing people half awake here.
Following the dialectic of Jesus and Satan (both fake). While using fake history to shape their argument (Nazis motivations, oblivious to Hitler being a traitorous tool).
Still, some good points here and there but overall it's tainting the subject with religious stuff that doesn't need to be part of the conversation
Have to agree. This is just one of many massive inconsistencies. Where are the accounts and photos of this being built?
If it was actually made in the 60s then there still should be people, articles, invoices, injuries, stories about the construction