Freemasons never use checkerboards! The tiling is just a coincidence!
Did it or did it not have credence?
How so? God loves everyone including Jesus-belittling Muslims in palestine. I encourage all muslims to drop their sin and primitive worldview and trust Jesus over their moon god.
"You don't support pale stain." <- Does this sentence have credence, yes or no?
bans secret societies
How? To what extent? Do you know which ones were affected and how?
was a mason
Why the checkerboard tiles? Why couldn't it be something else? And why is it that he (wittingly or not) nuked the Right's reputation?
Downvoted for "ai is god" falsehood. The antiChrist will almost certainly use AI to fool you. Image of the beast speaking? Smells very AI.
Well, at least you can use the talking point that you don't support Pale Stain and everyone who thinks you do is straw manning you.
Masonic checker squares. So hitler was a mason. Given all the stuff surrounding him and the fact he obliterated the Right's reputation more than helping it, I wonder if he was a 33rd degree mason.
Rejecting history (the Bible) because Richard Dawkins yelled emotionally at God in his fallacious book is like burning down your house because you found a spider in the attic. It's a race to the primitive and empty and bad, and exactly what we're trying to avoid because it ends with practicing wickedness and deviancy, and eating cats like a 3rd worlder.
What science is being rejected? I don't believe "Cells emerged from goop" is science, but a HISTORICAL claim. So what is he talking about??
You are a pursuer of truth at all costs? (n/a)
If what you say is true, what do you propose we do about it? (n/a)
Anything I can do for you with my coregency? (answered, kinda)
Thankfully, Christianity isn't a cult. Evolution and long ages is, as it is pushed in the cult-infected public schools and in the mainstream. If you doubt the covid-scamthing, then you should absolutely doubt the fake origins and history that contradict Genesis.
do have us enslaved
Enslaved to sin?
and worshipping their God.
Which god? How so? What do you believe that looks like?
Thats the best objective metric for the truth of the Bible - that we already ARE the servants of Jews
If you believe that well break whatever chains you think you have. Christianity frees. Sin enslaves.
and that they are the 'light of the nations'
Mabye in Biblical Times. Now today, though, we are.
ie they rule over us indirectly and that their god has somehow successfully replaced our own.
?
Remember they prophesied that the nations would foreswear their own ancestors and grab the hem of their garments saying 'God is with you'.
When? Quote?
this is not an elite research forum
Between Cabal censorship demoralizing and prohibiting people (ie UK and EU users), IRL things, Trump winning, fatigue about events, lack of fame of this community, and cussing/vitriol from people, it's not looking good for the platform.
its turned into a bit of a Christian echo-chamber populated by just a tint handful of the same people.
This platform is a Truth Seeking logic-using platform, more so than most. That is what you will get, because Christianity is Ultimately, immutably, objectively, all-around true. Also, plenty of worldviews have their echo chambers.
If it were really elite research then how come you just adopt all the brainless interpretations of the Bible
Projection, because plenty of athiests have strawman takes on the Bible that Christians don't believe in.
to be a Christian is to be a 'jew who says they are a jew but are not, and do lie'.
Verse? Verse? Biblical Israelites served God. The ones Jesus drove out were being contraBiblical. Also, God is in charge, so He can add anyone He wants into the fold. Do you complain if a web developer implements some Python into his C++ code or vice versa?? Well if you don't then you should do so now.
To be a Christian is to be a 'jew in name only' and
See above.
one of those pretenders whom Jesus in the book of Revelation had such disdain for.
No, Christians are loved like all humans are, and blessed.
Jews and muslims would count as these false jews.
When have muslims pretended to be jews?
Yeah, false gods. If I worship a house, does that mean it nade the universe? No. It simply sits there, and is a creation not the Creator.
to acknowledge there is a master race above you
How so? What do you mean? Who is the "master"?
Joseph Smith's plates had zero contemporary archaeological corroboration unlike the Dead Sea Scrolls confirming Isaiah's prophecies centuries before Christ. Your 'anonymous sources' claim collapses when Luke names eyewitnesses like Cleopas in Luke 24, detailed enough to include roadside dust and baked fish consumption. Acts' conversion accounts aren't contradictory but complementary. Paul tailored his testimony to different audiences like any competent witness. The Sanhedrin couldn't produce Christ's body because Romans sealed the tomb under penalty of death, their silence screams historical corroboration.
Isaiah 53's precise crucifixion description predates Rome's invention of the method by 700 years, statistical impossibility without Divine Inspiration. Your Josephus forgery claim ignores Arabic versions preserving the original James reference untouched by Christian scribes. Tacitus wrote within living memory of events, closer to Christ than Plutarch was to Alexander. The Ebionite red herring fails. James' ossuary bears the Nazareth inscription confirming early Christian veneration sites. Your 'symbolism' dodge can't explain why Roman historians like Thallus recorded crucifixion darkness or why Jerusalem's destruction precisely fulfilled Christ's Olivet prophecy within forty years.
"I doubt you believe in all of Islam's claims to miracles and what they say about God just because they mention historical places and potentially historical exploits." you say. Yet Islam's supposed miracles crumble under scrutiny, the moon-splitting claim leaves zero geological or astronomical evidence while Christ's resurrection triggered seismic cultural shifts documented across Roman, Jewish, and pagan sources. Joseph Smith's fraud was exposed when his 'reformed Egyptian' hieroglyphs proved gibberish while the Rosetta Stone confirmed Biblical archaeology's accuracy. Your 'anonymous sources' argument implodes under legal scrutiny. Paul names over 500 witnesses in 1 Corinthians 15, many still alive when circulated, making false claims legally actionable under Roman libel laws.
The Shroud's 3D bloodstain patterns match forensic wound mappings unavailable to medieval forgers, with pollen traces placing it precisely in Judea. Your 'different wrapping' claim ignores John 20:7's specification of a separate face cloth, confirmed by the Sudarium of Oviedo's matching blood type and traumatic stains. While you can point out that throughout the Bible there are historical places in it, and also that it may reflect some actual historical events, it doesn't mean that the specific claims made by the texts or people involved in the texts were accurate. you say. Yet Roman census records confirm Quirinius' governorship overlapping Herod's reign. And many religions have their martyrs who refuse to recant the beliefs of their religion." you say. But no other martyrs died for historically verifiable events they personally witnessed. Peter could have saved himself by recanting the resurrection he saw with his eyes, touched with his hands.
"Paul's alleged conversion only comes from him." you say. false again. Luke documents Paul's blindness healing in Acts 9, confirmed by Ananias' contemporaneous testimony. "In Acts the story changes each time." yet courtroom testimony varies in emphasis, not substance.
"Luke 24 presents the ascension of Jesus as happening on the same day of the resurrection. In Acts 1, the ascension is portrayed as 40 days later." Luke 24:50-53 describes a blessing gesture before Christ's final departure. Acts 1 expands the timeline just as Exodus expands Genesis' creation account. "That's symbolic play on the number 40, and 12 guys all speaking in tongues is symbolic." Archaeology confirms Pentecost's multilingual crowds while Josephus records exact priestly courses matching Luke's Temple details.
Your "Talking snakes, talking donkeys" dismissal ignores that evolutionists think animals evolved, so mabye these were evolved forms! "The Gospels crucifixion and resurrection accounts differ in such a way that makes them non-compatible with each other." No, they align perfectly when you realize John supplements synoptics' morning events while Matthew focuses on guard details.
"Your stuff about the Sanhedrin not being able to find a body and Roman guards abandoning their posts presupposes that a man named Jesus was crucified and buried in the manner stated across those texts." What? Even atheist historian Bart Ehrman admits Jesus' crucifixion under Pilate is "the most certain fact about the historical Jesus." "Texts that were not written down at the time, but decades later." 1 Corinthians 15's creed dates within five years of the resurrection while Papyrus 52 confirms John's early composition.
"Claims that did not go over well with Jewish people, and could only gain popularity in people of a different culture and society." Acts records thousands of Jewish converts including priests while Ossuaries prove early Judean Christian burials. "Those like James, were not Christians like you think they were. They were Ebionites, and the Christians rejected the Ebionites as heretics because they believed very different than they did." Jerome records Ebionites using Matthew's gospel affirming Christ's Divinity while James' ossuary inscription "James son of Joseph, brother of Jesus" confirms familial recognition.
"The Josephus account is a forgery and the Tacitus account was written almost a hundred years after the alleged events." Scholar Louis Feldman shows Josephus' James reference remains untouched in Arabic manuscripts while Tacitus accessed official Roman archives. "Even with mass media many people still believe the fictional story about Washington chopping down a cherry tree." Parson Weems fabricated that tale 20 years post-Washington's death while Christ's resurrection had multiple eyewitness accounts circulating within months. Christ's core miracles withstand scrutiny.
"The symbolic nature of the Gospels can easily be seen in Matthew 1. Three sets of 14 generations, that wouldn't be historically accurate. That's symbolism." Luke's divergent genealogy proves selective recording, not fabrication. "The Gospel of John placing the cleansing of the temple at the beginning of the ministry...blatant changing of the narrative." Ancient writers often arranged events thematically. John highlights Christ's authority while synoptics focus on chronology. "A virgin birth is just symbolic." Isaiah 7:14's 'almah' specifically meant virgin in context while Matthew quotes the Septuagint's 'parthenos', a term never used for married women.
"The texts in the Bible are in line with the mythological accounts of what people did back then." Dying and rising gods like Osiris never had single eyewitness accounts or transformed skeptics like James. "Only when we go home do we ever meet God." Christ promised "I am with you always", impossible if He only meets us postmortem. "All that a cabal seeking to assert tyrannical authority over religious people who believe the word of God is found in texts is to control the production and translation of those texts. Passages like Romans 13:1-2, and 1 Peter 2:14-15,17-18 look pretty obviously inserted by a tyrannical cabal to give themselves as an alleged God-inspired authority that has to be followed." Early Christians like Polycarp defied authorities unto death while Nero's persecution disproves your power-grab theory.
"The second half has God promising that if people don't obey what it allegedly said, then it's going to rejoice over bringing destruction upon them." Yet Christ's Olivet Discourse predicted Jerusalem's destruction within forty years, precisely matching Josephus' records of cannibalism during Rome's siege, while simultaneously promising salvation through Himself alone. Your 'tyrannical God' caricature ignores Christ bearing suffering on Calvary.
Your 'cabal' conspiracy ignores that most apostles died horrific deaths defending eyewitness accounts, hardly the behavior of power-hungry schemers. At every point, manuscript evidence, archaeological confirmation, sociological consistency, Christianity withstands scrutiny that vaporizes competing worldviews. Your objections rely on double standards no historian would apply to Alexander or Caesar. The resurrection remains the best-attested ancient miracle precisely because it erupted into documented history. That's why former skeptics like Strobel and Turek became Christians after following the evidence where it leads.
Why the downvote?
Yes, and that cannot apply to angels or demons because they are supernatural.
And? He goes by many Names and Titles. Biblical Christianity is objectively the freest worldview in existence.
"Let's kill Whitey and make ourselves richer." greed noises
Since we have been transformed by Christ, we should “take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them” (Ephesians 5:11, ESV). The “unfruitful works of darkness” include things like sexual immorality, impurity, covetousness, filthiness, foolish talk, and crude joking (verses 3–4). These things are unfruitful because they do not produce the Righteousness of God. In contrast, believers should “walk as children of light (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true)” (verse 9). By walking in the light, we can “discern what is pleasing to the Lord” (verse 10).
Meanwhile what does your worldview offer, hmmm???
Why does anyone like, prefer, seek truth? Instead of whats false? Instead of not?
Why is anyone OFFENDED by nontruths/lies? Not just "let it fly", not "happy", but OFFENDED? Pretty unnecessary in a "no-God" view.
Hallmarks of athiests:
Misunderstand/dont want to understand Christianity (With you, yes)
Most focus their negative energy on Christianity more than other belief systems. (more general - behavior visible across many types of nonChristians) (Partly)
Use many logical fallacies (With you, yes)
Probably believe in evo, bigbang, millions years (Probably but not know)
Believing in a naturalistic and limited grasp of parts of the Bible. A degraded version of what God has said. Sorta like the "Telephone game". (With you, yes)
human nature is to repel away from the Biblical God, so He canNOT be made up. So people are more comfy with evo than BIBLICAL Christianity.
Ever notice how humanity has such an adverse shock reaction to Christianity, despite it being very famous and allegedly believed by 2 billion? If it is so famous and widely believed and teaches love, hope, joy, mercy, peace, why do people have such a lash out anger reaction to it?? Weird. No other religion has these traits. If Christianity is made up no one should lash out, everyone should be cozy. People are cozyier to other religions than Christianity it seems.
"The probability of the universe creating itself in a one off event with the fine tuning that is present is 1 in 10 to the 10 to the 123rd. (Roger Penrose, an atheist physicist calculated it.) How big is that number? You could liken it to a blind guy floating in the universe and told to pick one certain particle and he does it first try. u/Mrexreturns But not just one universe but a billion. THAT is why they have resorted to the rediculous theory of a random universe generator (really!)."
The false notion is that Christianity induces a fear based view.
Both fear and love towards God co-exist in the Christian, and MUST. By the fear of the Lord men depart from evil, we never outgrow the need for that but we learn to REPENT, making our need to lean on this aspect less and less frequent. The path of the just is like the shining light, that gets brighter and brighter unto the perfect day, another passage from Proverbs.
Basically what happens is as we grow in the Lord, fear gets swallowed up by Love :) In fact one telltale sign of the Love of God at work (rather than other types of love) is that it never displaces the fear of the Lord. They coexist
BUT
Christianity should never be "fear based." Everyone first comes to God as a lion; specifically, the Lion of the Tribe of Judah. God put an Angel with a flaming fiery sword at the entrance to Eden after kicking Adam and Eve out of it, to make sure they weren't getting back in; I'm sure that was a scary sight! And it worked: had Adam and Eve been thinking about going back into Eden, they saw that and REPENTED! They changed their mind and decided it would not be a good idea, which is exactly what "repent" means. Without the fear of the Lord they wouldn't have departed from that particular evil.
Christianity does have paradox. And mystery! But if your Faith is actually based on fear something's horribly wrong, and hopefully you're being driven by the Holy Spirit to address that right quick ..."
This title is as stupid as claiming that "trannyism is great". https://i.imgflip.com/af4a8c.jpg
So they are supernatural. Good you know that. So they do not have souls.