Yeah, same faggot who wrote the post that axo linked.

Very sus

Usurper - a person who seizes or exercises authority or possession wrongfully.

Truth - that which is in accordance with fact or reality.

Infinite - limitless or endless in space, extent, or size; impossible to measure or calculate.

If you’re wondering the purpose of the post, it is intended as an open-ended prompt regarding the status of Truth in the world and the attempts of {some} to manipulate that status. Examples include:

Postmodernism/relativism which attempts to claim “all truth is relative” == “no truth is absolute”

Sabbatean Frankists who claim “all that is unholy is holy”

Orwellian doublespeakers who claim “freedom is slavery”

Many examples of Usurpers spring to mind

But what do the stars say?

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16ZqiBusID/petition-to-make-cconspiracies-i/c

Check that ban message that their mongoloid top mod sent me for making this post:

https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/16ZqiBuJvl/the-usurper-says-truth-is-infini/c

I had it bookmarked on ZLib until their domains got blasted, haven’t had a chance to hunt for it again yet!

So many open questions, some that come to mind:

1. the “problem” of consciousness (aka the source and mechanism)

2. the observer “problem” of quantum mechanics

3. the “dark matter” “problem”

4. the “dark energy”/“zero-point energy” “problem”

5. hell, going on 100 years now and we still don’t have a scale-invariant theory of the universe (quantum and macro systems don’t reconcile)

(Edit) 6) the finely tuned universe “problem” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe

The fact that people are so confident in their error is the worst part. “Safe and effective” - until their priests educate them otherwise

Excellent response man you touch on a ton of really interesting stuff related to this idea!

In the first place, you’re absolutely right, it’s as if our overconfidence in our own knowledge, or our hubris even, leads us to “ruling out” things which cannot justifiably be ruled out when given an honest accounting.

It seems in regards to the fields of science, this is mostly based on the assumptions or even beliefs of the scientists who make up that field. And if anything has been shown time and time again, it’s that when you assume, one tends to make an ass of everything.

I see this whole subject as echoing Kuhn’s ”Paradigm Shift” perspective, where entrenched beliefs and the paradigms built on these beliefs actively resist the shift towards greater truth, when it threatens their foundational beliefs structure.

Likewise, your point about Gödel’s ”Incompleteness Theorem” is spot-on. Not only did he prove that some logical systems are incomplete, but actually that ALL symbolic logical systems (i.e. “math”/“language”/“code”) are INHERENTLY incomplete. Where “incompleteness” seems quite complicated, but it basically means “no logical system is capable of actually proving itself correct” - which has insane repercussions on things like math in general, which is inherently based on making assumptions (axioms) which mathematicians all regard as “proven”, but which ultimately are totally undermined by Gödel’s work. It’s a mind blowing thing to try and wrap your head around, and directly relavent to this subject, so thanks for raising it!

The video is based on a book, divided into 10 chapters, each dedicated to a question which Sheldrake feels has been neglected by the scientific establishment because of dogmatic beliefs which undergird this “religion of Scientism”.

He provides the “standard” (mainstream, cutting-edge scientific) answer to each. But then to each question, he shows study after study which demonstrate there is effectively no way the “standard” answer is correct, sufficient, or in many cases even pointing in the right direction.

Here are the chapter titles, if any of them pique your interest I recommend finding a copy of the book, you likely won’t be disappointed:

1. Is Nature Mechanical?

2. Is the Total Amount of Matter and Energy Always the Same?

3. Are the Laws of Nature Fixed?

4. Is Matter Unconscious?

5. Is Nature Purposeless?

6. Is All Biological Inheritance Material?

7. Are Memories Stored as Material Traces?

8. Are Minds Confined to Brains?

9. Are Psychic Phenomena Illusory?

10. Is Mechanistic Medicine the Only Kind that Really Works?

Here is an interesting, short (18m) video on the subject of Scientism, especially how its dogmatic approach often constricts the ability of honest people using science as a tool to pursue truth:

The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake

Globohomo knows no national boundaries

The archetypal Thai lady-boy

The source, as far back as we have records for, were the Mystery Schools of the Ancients. They most likely learned it from an advanced globe-trotting civilization that was nearly wiped out at the end of the last ice-age ~12,000 years ago.

Which site/system are you using?

https://astro.cafeastrology.com/natal.php

That one blew me away, and after spending most of my life thinking this was some silly shit for women who spend too much money on “crystals”, I became convinced there is something valid at the core of this system.

Speaking to shills who can’t even keep up in this simple discussion we’re having is clearly worthless. So I might as well warn others that you’re a shill, so they don’t waste their time on you

Remember folks:

This faggot I’m talking to made thousands of accounts to astroturf and forum slide this website:

https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/141Yg8cAra/vote-manipulation-problem/c

https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/141YIjZZTk/consume-sockpuppets/c

Everything this shill says should be treated with suspicion.

ah right, it’s a kabbal of satanists who read every single one of their 100,000,000+ members into the secrets of their degeneracy and their plans for domination. Psyops and propaganda definitely are unable to produce “useful idiots”. Definitely.

Not trannies as you know them. Not homosexuals as you know them. Not women as you know them. Not jews as you know them. Those who are behind these groups are so far removed from those within them that you are serving the desires of those behind the curtain when you blame those in front of the curtain.

The entire goal is mass human sacrifice. Those behind the curtain don’t really care who gets sacrificed.

It’s DEFFINITLY because this tranny is part of a 6000+ year old kabbal of satanists! It’s definitely NOT because they’re a midwit retard who’s been so inundated with psyop propaganda that their anchors to reality have dissolved! No way!

Very interesting thought process to begin to explain some very important mysteries, just hoping for some further insights:

What exactly is the image of this process over time looking like? Can you describe the events of one whole cycle (not specifics, but generally what’s occurring/driving things)? Is our Sun the thing that’s micro-nova’ing? Or is the idea that the Galaxy actually has “concentric rings of charged dust” from some other cause which somehow cause a micronova event?

Cheers thanks for sharing and thanks for actually producing something too!

Some good stuff on their, just checked out their video on the pyramids as a Tesla type power system, with some very interesting insights I hadn’t seen before

12th Chamber, from the album 1212 (twelve twelve), by the hip hop duo 7L ES

Sounds goodmann, I’ve missed sinking my teeth into your intellectual feasts of perspectives I so rarely see treated with the aplomb they deserve. I’d be quite interested in your response to my question on the purpose/benefits of the flesh as you see them, raised in your daily verse from a week or so back. See how our positions have evolved over the last Cycle

When you get a chance, check the two videos out which I link in the first comment of this old post:

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12jJdwnfwD/the-smithsonian-has-covered-up-t/c

There’s pretty good physical evidence and a surprising amount of “reputable” written accounts of giant humans, both in antiquity and even up to modern times, in more remote locations.

You are spot on, my OP was a bit rushed, just trying to get my inner thoughts expressed in an initial form. You raise interesting nuance and basically express what I was going for, but more accurately to according to “the record”, so thanks.

The post would benefit tremendously from putting these concepts into context, or atleast what we think we know of their context. Namely that these systems seem to have been designed chiefly with regards to astrological measurements and record-keeping. Hence the base-60 system of the deep ancients (where the consideration of the spherical heavens was the primary goal, seemingly, which is facilitated greatly by the base-60 system and its convenience with subdividing spheres/circles) slowly devolving to the base 12 influences seen in the near ancients, which clearly still had great reverence for the heavens but seem to have drifted away from “science” to “religion” for lack of better terms. Almost like a great gift had been passed down to them, but in their youth and naïveté they had forgotten its true value and mechanisms.

Like you say, the only logical system is base-10. The fact that our oldest counting systems used these absurd (in most respects) counting bases indicates clearly, to me atleast, that there was an outside influence at work here.

Cheers man thanks again for the comment!

I’m inclined to believe they meant what they said, when they all called this group/race “giants” - but admittedly the notion that their large stature was simply “in the eye of the beholder” or somehow otherwise a metaphorical statement can’t be ruled out.

My best understanding is that, in the past, society/civilization has risen and fallen. The most coherent explanation for what appears to be a “common cultural ancestor” is exactly that - a group who was forced to spread out in diaspora (ecological disaster/warfare induced migration). Then, because of this disaster and diaspora, these different locations were unable to contact eachother, and thus what started as a common cultural influence gradually changed as different local factors impacted the development of these new civilizations [made up of small numbers of diaspora members and relatively far larger numbers of “primitive” (aka “suited to life after a disaster) locals.]

That’s your epitaph

>more than one globe spanning civilization existing during the catastrophic transition between the previous and the current Era