Your schizophrenia is leaking
Quit spamming this place with your fuckin facebook-tier status updates, queer
Well, except for the fact that neither of those are quotes… ( 🚨 retard alert 🚨 )
doha don
L
M
F
A
O
> too fucking stupid to know how the meme arrows work
> thinks American conservatives should pay to establish and maintain an ethnostate for the most subversive, anti-west ethnicity on earth
Yeah, checks out
the orange retard
You mean Zion Don? I think you’re on the wrong site lmfao - go back to bluesky
🚨 Retard Alert 🚨
He’s been a billionaire since the 2004
No actually it was all the business he did as a [[[banker]]] which made him rich through shady deals, you fucking mongoloid
Changing the subject?
🚨 Retard Alert 🚨
The subject is Peter Thiel, who is a gay jew who worships the antichrist
You’re the one yapping about Christians, despite the story you linked involving precisely zero Christians
talking about nominal “Christians” who center their life around sucking israeli toes
calls them christcucks
I guess it is true what they say about broken clocks
“Do gay, antichrist-worshipping jews run our government? No…it’s the women’s fault!”
[meta comment] amazingly, I made this exact same post here on c/Conspiracies (which has hundreds of accounts subscribed to it at a minimum) and on a far smaller community (c/HumanPotential) which has MAYBE 20 people subscribed to it. Yet the post made here has 2 upvotes while the post made there has 8 and counting. The only difference between these communities, other than subscriber count, is that c/Conspiracies is hidden from the trending feed while c/HumanPotential isn’t.
This should indicate to everyone that a HUGE issue in terms of this place stagnating, or “dying” is this simple fact, that this place has almost no “discoverability”. I think step one to rejuvenate this place is to tell the admins to re-add c/Conspiracies to the site’s Trending feed:
The video uploader links Gibson’s claims to the somewhat well-known John Chang, though Gibson himself never explicitly names him.
This video contains most footage of Chang known to exist:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TdYM0vNufwc
And this book was written by an engineer from General Dynamics f-17 fighter jet program who decided to seek out Chang and trained under him for a decade:
c/HumanPotential for more
So that is the cost of truth - ego.
Very interesting thought…. We’ve all heard of “ego death”, (but probably, mostly as linked to psychedelic drugs) - the thought that when we let our ego die, Truth comes knocking to fill the void, the Truth that Jesus came to share with us, kind of ties together a few “seemingly disconnected” threads in a way that makes a lot of sense.
Through a debate. Great minds united to figure out the truth even at the cost of their own ego
Hear here!
What do you think the modern church gets most wrong?
So how do you square that with the idea of loving everyone equally?
Did you read my response to krab’s similar followup?
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK0Mea4A/the-jews-committed-genocide-agai/c/4eXtiGi58jQ
I propose that the Truth, the Way, and ultimately all Christianity is encapsulated in various isomorphic statements of rejection of nihilism and acceptance of a transcendent greatness harmonizing Self and Other. From that, anything can be built, and often is built more wrongly than rightly. But no specific formula is required for this essential concept to be recognized
Well put, by my reckoning
Really great, insightful response - thanks for sharing it
Everyone may now return to arguing about chapter and verse, which is where comfort lies.
Hah, seems we may not even get that far!
Funny you should say that, atleast he managed to respond to the prompt
The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.
In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.
Hmm…well, I thank the go(o)d of the universe for its never ending cycle of giving good, and in response each one giving good back to the universe in turn(ing the wheel of time), such that your fruit today was part of the universe shared with me - as usual with your generosity, you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on. These temporary bindings are how we grow! The oak grows stronger in the wind!
All brought each one apart from one another to allow analysis
I think All did that to allow choice - generally speaking, and [specifically, ultimately, and fundamentally,] the choice between seeking, or rejecting, re-union
Desire implies want; require implies need
Living naturally, these rightly align - would you agree? The issue for us, millenia removed from nature, seems to be this process of analysis you mention, and ultimately a choice (or perhaps more accurately, procession of choices from inception to death) to be made, no?
autistically hyper-focused https://gifer.com/en/DNj
Hey, autists rise up - I think these existential questions are made painfully… important for them/us/you/me and the like. I see it as a broad pattern of behaviors - The kids who physically can’t function are something different, and I think it’s a crazy conspiracy that the two have been conflated, 50 years ago perhaps we’d be talking about “hermits” and “retards”… idk, that’s the shitty (?) part about using language to communicate, not only is “it” ever-shifting, but everyone has their own personal definitions for words. We choose to struggle to communicate, because, I believe, we recognize the alternative as far worse
natural sound
The sound of doing - which is not carried on the wind, but on our vulgar words fashioned for the purposes of sharing the lessons we’ve experienced - our tales of glory and good and evil
“Be the change you want to see in the world” - and maybe people will listen? Even Without words?
You say
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side…?
But ultimately they are there so that we may come to know there is something beyond them, just as our vulgar/fleshy words grasp at the formless divine, this “beyond” is the ultimate terminus of the journey from inception to death that you’ve identified as a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?
Just as you are forced to put your innate wisdom and your wisdom of the innate into words in order to help others grow (which seems a type of cosmic irony innate to physical existence), so too have all the others who have recognized this, just as it will continue to be for those who come to recognize this
The soil from which truth grows is this:
What others profess, I will also proclaim: “Forced principles will not be viable”, Let this be the heart and soul of the message.
Tao Te Ching verse 42
what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?
Tao Te Ching verse 27
Sure, fair enough, (even potentially well translated) 2000 year old Chinese definitely leaves room for interpretation. I’ll mix its words, (your words), and [my words] to show how I think your issues are already addressed, when these views are properly [imo obviously] understood - i don’t believe these views teach the “suicidal altruism” that some nefarious entities like to portray them as teaching, a delusion which many well-intentioned seekers can easily fall into, given the level of control that these nefarious entities have over the flow of information we [speaking generally] consume
"When people near-by (natural communities) are not befriended, there is no use [because you’ll end up with a “melting pot”] endeavoring to attract those at a distance ."
The nearest person is obviously yourself. If one truly loves themselves, that alone addresses a large part of the way the delusion of the melting pot is foisted upon us. The people in the west have been taught to loathe themselves for multiple generations now. [i.e. the endlessly regurgitated narratives of colonialism, slavery, racism, etc]. Like I say, addressing that alone addresses a large portion of the problem
The next nearest to ourselves is our immediate family and kin - obviously, or atleast “naturally”, homogenous with ourselves. When one truly loves their family and kin, again, I see that address another large portion of “the problem”. We know the statistical realities of inter-racial relationships, and we have known for centuries. It takes active effort to try to make us forget. However, free will is the central foundation, and as such, I don’t know if “just make it illegal” is the solution. I lean towards something like, “shut down promotion of it, educate on the realities of it, but don’t attempt to enforce tyranny. As the first paragraph of the wiki i quoted lays out:
Mozi's moral teachings emphasized introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity, rather than obedience to rituals. He observed that people often learned about the world through adversity.[7] By reflecting on one's own successes and failures, one attains true self-knowledge rather than mere conformity to ritual.
Which I think pretty much speaks for itself here, and what im trying to express above
Next we have the wider community, perhaps called “the nation” at one point in time but with centuries of dilution very few “natural” nations (as one here might define), exist anymore. But if one truly loves their people, their “nation”, I believe the rest of the problem is addressed. With this framework in mind, the core of the nation is always building and getting stronger, and the far fringes are where experimentation happens, as has been the case throughout all of human history it seems (aka what appears to be “natural”)
If any of that makes sense, you might find an earlier post of mine interesting, which I believe speaks more to this issue of suicidal empathy and how that differs from The Way (or in the words of the short story, “unreasonable grace”). Though it’s quite long so I’ll just link it instead of trying to fit it in this already becoming unwieldy reply:
https://communities.win/c/ChristianAnarchism/p/1AR0GimkmR/unreasonable-grace-and-the-dilem/c
Edit) un-autocorrected a couple autocorrects
Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.
True, and wise - to clarify my thoughts, I see Mo Zi and the school(s) he established as exemplars of the innate process(es) available to everyone (or, perhaps just every man, there is logic pointing in both directions). While these processes are available to every-one, rare are the ones who follow the path steadfastly. These are the Christs, the Buddhas, the Immortals (though a more accurate name is perhaps “those who choose the time of their death”), they have been known by as many names as there have been congregations of humans. In fact, a few years ago i came across a new name which I believe finds its source in this vein, a very interesting name indeed, u/free-will-of-choice
Often, and increasingly so as the congregation grows, people come to mistake the teacher for the lesson they came to teach. I think that’s one of the main impediments to our forward momentum vis a vis this subject
Aren’t you the one who’s been banned from 109 boards for your inability to do anything other than schizophrenic ranting?