so mad he pegged you - lol
wait, did u think that i thought it was real? LOL. Way to assume things i never said. Holy Fuk you are super retarded. I bet if i posted a clip from Godzilla, youd be like OMG He believes in 600 ft lizards. I bet you took 6 vaxes and still wear a mask, dum AF sucker.🤣🤣🤣🤣
why are you roasting yourself? If it makes you happy?
"hello - 911 , theres a ghost in my house , please send the ghostbusters" ok troll, thanks for the advice + laughs, u gotta be the dumbest troglodyte ever youre so dumb, other troglodytes are embarrassed, facts
stop beating yourself up
any proof of your baseless claims or do you just like being stupid?
- “Authoritarian morons always think stupid, proud, and egotistical things like this.” PEOPLE WHO USE THE WORD AUTHORITARIANS ARE JUST LOW IQ IDIOTS WHO FEEL VICTIMIZED BY THE SYSTEMS AND NEED TO BLAME OTHER PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY CANT HANDLE BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN WRONG THOUGHTS AND MISUNDERSTASNDINGS. AND LOOK AT YOU CALLING OTHER PEOPLE MORONS – U MUST BE TRAUMATIZED BY THIS CONVERSATION AND ARE STRESSING OUT BY LASHING OUT WITH YOUR RAGE – QUITE THE HYPOCRITE ARENT YOU? PLEASE STOP EMBARRESING YOURSELF.
- “I’m not the victim of your actions/emotions, you are!” WOW THE PROJECTION IS STRONG IN YOU, IM JUST TELLING YOU FACTS, PLEASE DONT LET YOUR FEELINGS OF INAdEQUECY CLOUD YOUR JUDGEMENT.
- “which is causing YOU distress!” WHY WOULD TELLING A TROLLLER WHO BEEN ASKED 6 X TO STOP MSESASAGING ME AND WONT LISTEN AND REFUSES TO understand HOW REALITY WORKS CAUSE STRESS? REALLY YOUR PROJECTION IS GETTING OBVIOUS NOW, TRY TO GET CONTROL OVER YOUR FEELINGS PLZ.
- “please provide specific examples so we can discuss them.” YOUR DOUBLE SPEAK AND WRONG THINK IS ALL OVER THIS THREAD, YOUR IDEA OF DISCUSSION IS JUST YOUR DENILE OF REALITY CAUSE YOU FEEL LIKE YOU KNOW STUFF. TALKING TO YOU IS LIK BURNING In A FIRE, SOMETHING PEOPLE NEED TO AVOID
- “....emotion damage rant..” I'll skip this part, it seems u need a time out
- “You are trying (failing currently) to teach your explanation for..” CORRECTING YOUR WRONG IS NOT PART OF TEACHING , IF YOU THINK IT IS I'M GOING TO NEED A CITATION FOR YOUR BASELESS CLAIM, IF NOT ILL JUST WRITE IT OFF AS PART OF YOUR MISUNDERSTANDING OF REALITY
- “If we have the truth, brother or sister - it is our duty to share it.” TRUTH IS A JOURNEY, NOT A DESTINATION YOU THINK YOUVE REACHED. YOU HAVE NO DUTY, THE ONLY DUTY YOU HAVE IS TO NOT BUG PEOPLE , SOMETHING YOU VIOLATE DAILY.
- “Sharing the truth is its own reward, don’t you agree? “ NO, NOT AT ALL, SILENCE IS GOLDEN, YOU NEED TO LEARN TO STFU, YOUR DROWNING IN A SEA OF WRONG, YOURE IN NO POSITION TO TRY TO SAVE OTHERS
- “ the definition of the word is common” SO APPEALING TO CON-SENSES MAKES SOMETHING RIGHT? WHICH IDIOT TOLD YOU THAT?
- “ opaque means light blocking” OK, WHICH PERCENTASGE OF LIGHT BLOCKING? YOUR ADHD MAKES YOU FOCUS ON THE 100% WHILE IGNORING THE 10% CASE, SO ITS MAKING YOU VERY SHORT SIGHTED, AND FRANKLY STUPID. WHATEVER FLOATS YOUR BOAT I GUESS
- ““Depth appears different due to perspective, but that is an illusion – obviously.” WRONG ,DEPTH IS QUITE PHYSICAL, ITS REALLY THERE, YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF APPERNT IS WRONG
- “ Do you understand what i am saying now?” YES, IVE ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS 100% WRONG, YOU DONT GET IT THOUGH, YOUR LETTING YOUR PRIDE IN IGNORANGE THINK FOR YOU
- I said that the apparent risin of it was an illusion.” THATS WRONG – APPERENT DOES NOT MEAN ILLUSION, IT MEANS ostensible rather than actual: AS IN THE GROUND APPEARS TO RISE, BUT ITS NOT ACTUALLY, IT DOESNT MAKE THAT GROUND AN OPTICAL ILLUSION. SO OF COURSE THE PHYSICAL GROUND THAT APPEARS TO BE RISING IN THE DISTSNCE OPTICALLY CAN BLOCK THE 2D FOREGOUND, IT CALLED OPTICAL OCCULTION.
- “It is never in between the sun and the observer (when it is flat). THE GROUND IS OPTICALLY RISING TO YOUR EYE HEIGHT BUT THE SUN LOCATION IS ALSO APPERENT AND SO WHEN THE TWO MEET, THE THINGS THATS CLOSER WINS, OPTICALLY , OR “SUN SET” gLOBARS SEE THIS AS A PHYSICAL THING, BUT ITS JUST AN OPTICAL BATTLE OF TWO APPERENTS THINGS AND THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE WINNER
- “ But when i try to replicate them, i can’t” NO ONE SAID MAKING MODEL WAS EASY BUT JUST TO MAKE IT EASY , LOOK AT 25 PHOTOS OF A ZOOMED IN HORIZON WHERE YOU CAN STILL SEE THINGS PROTRUDING FROM THE HORIZON, NOTICE HOW THINGS BEFORE THE HORIZON ARE 3D WHILE THINGS BEYOND THE HORIZON ARE NOT, MIGHT TAKE YOU SOME TIME TO SPOT THE DIFFERENCE BUT ONCE YOU DO, U CANT UNSEE IT.
- “ beyond it objects still shrink in apparent size as they recede for all the same reasons they do when they are closer.” oH LOOK, ANTHER BASELESS CLAIM YOU JUST PULL OUTOF YOUR ASS , PLZ, NO ONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS , YOUR EMBARRESSING YOURSELF
- “Depth IS due to having two eyes” EASILY PROVED WRONG, LOOK DOWN A HALLWAY , NOTICE THE DEPTH, NOW SHUT ONE EYE, DID THE DEPTH DISAPEAR? NO, YOURE JUST AN IDIOT WHO NEEDS THINGS REPEATED 10000 TIMES BEFORE YOU GET IT. I DONT HAVE THE PATIENCE YOU REQUIRE, I DOUBT ANYONE WOULD HAVE THAT.
- “your foolish pride” PROJECTION, IT IS YOUR FOOLISH PRIDE THAT WONT ALLOW YOU TO STOP REPLYING BECAUSE YOURE A TROLL AND TROLLS LIKE YOU GOTTA TROLL AND HARASS PEOPLE AND THEN BLAME THEM IF THEY DONT ACCEPT YOUR STUPID
gET A LIFE AND STOP BUGGING ME! I KNOW YOUR A LIAR AND PRETENDER, PLEASE F OFF.
“Condescension is never needed” - WRONG, ITS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THE CORRECT ORDER, SO YOU ALWAYS KNOW YOUR PLACE
“ It is a flimsy shield to protect your pride” YA, BY YOU REVERTING TO YOUR IM A VICTIM FEELINGS TO PROTECT YOUR PRIDE IN BEING A LOW IQ STALKER + TROLLER
“ you don’t need to resort to petty rhetorical trickery” IM NOT, IM JUST TELLING YOU THE TRUTH, YOUR USING DOUBLE SPEAK AND WRONG THINKI N ORDER TO PROLONG YOUR INFATUATION WITH YOUR DELUSIONS OF REALITY
“No need for ad hominem, emotion, and attitude - those are only needed when your position and thoughts are weak.” THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP HARPING ON YOUR EMOTIONAL DAMAGE AND FEELINGS OF ATTITUDE, IS IT TO DISGUISE THE WEAKNESS OF YOUR LOGIC, MAYBE THAT WORKS ON IDIOTS BUT I DONT STACK SHIT THAT HIGH AND THEN TRY TO CRY ON ITS SHOULDER, YOU DO.
“First i need to understand what it is you are teaching” IM NOT TEACHING ANYTHING, IM JUST CORRECTING YOUR WRONG. ALSO TEACHERS GET PAID, ARE YOU PAYING ME TO CORRECT YOUR NUMPTY CRACKER JACK WINDOW LICKING?
“ Opaque is a word, it has a definition” OH, ITS A WORD, WOW, THANKS FOR YOUR BRILLIANT OBSERVATION EINSTEIN, THIS WORD ALSO HAS SYNONYMS WHICH HINT AS ITS OBSURRED COMPLTE MEANING, BUT BE MY GUEST KEEP THINKING IN B&W LIKE A CRAYON MUNCHER
“ simply accept that you are using the word with your own definition” WRONG, IM USING A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING BASED ON DICTIONARY , THESAURAS AND GENERAL USAGE, YOU ARE FOLLOWING WHAT A FALSE AUTHORITY TOLD YOU TO DO, CAUSE SCARED LITTLE COWARD
“Depth appears different due to perspective, but that is an illusion – obviously.” WRONG, YOUR CONFLATED SOMETHING LIKE A MIRAGE WITCH IS AN OPTICAL ILLUSION WITH SOMETHING LIKE THE APPERNT HORIZON WHICH IS JUST PHYSICAL GROUND THAT APPEARS AS A LINE, BUT THE GROUND IS REALLY THERE, REALLY I SWEAR
“But how can the ground obstruct when it isn’t in the way? “ THE GROUND AT THE HORIZON IS REALLY THERE , ITS NOT A OPTICAL ILLUSION, IT IS QUITE PRYSICAL, YOU MUST BE CONFUSED , THE HOROZON ITSELF IS AN ILLUSION – ITS NOT REALLY THRERE , BUT IT SITS ON GROUND THAT IS REALLY THERE, GET IT. IF YOU WANT AN EXAMPLE OF THIS – THERES THE SUN SET, OR IVE SEENS TONS OF VIDEO OF ITEMS DISPPEARING BOTTTOM FIRST OVER 50 FEET ON A TOTALLY FLAT FLOOR
“angular resolution IS the diffraction limit, they are one and the same” WRONG, I CAN GET A HAIR TO DISSAPER 20 FEET AWAY BECAUSE OF ANGULAR RESOLUTION , IS THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT 20 FEET AWAY, I DONT THINK SO. THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT IS WHERE YOUR ABILTY TO PERCIEVE DEPTH DISAPPEARS, BASED ON YOUR EYE HEIGHT, GETTING A HAIR TO DISAPPEAR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR EYE HEIGHT
“The reason things shrink is due to perspective” IF THEY'RE WITHIN THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT, THEN YES, IF THEY'RE BEYOND IT, THEN NO. TRY TO FIND AN EXAMPLE OF THAT WHICH YOU CLAIM , YOU WONT CAUSE YOU'RE JUST PULLING STUFF OUT OF YOUR BUTT, CAUSE IGNORANT AS F
“your definition of diffraction limit is wrong.” WRONG, YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF IT IS INCOMPLETE , CAUSE YOURE AN IDIOT, U JUST SAID YOU THINK ITS 10 FEET AWAY, ARE YOU RETARDED, SERIOUSLY? I NEED TO KNOW CAUSE IF YOU ARE I SHOULDNT TIE YOU TO MY WHIPPNG POST.
“but you think depth exists in 2D” GOOD , YOU NOW REALIZE THE SUN IS ALWAYS BEYOND THE DIFFACTION LIMIT AND IS NEVER PERCIEVED IN 3D PERSPECTIVE WHERE ANGULAR SIZES CHANGES DRASTICALLY. IS THE SUN ACTYUALLY 3D? I WOULD SPECULATE IT PROBABLY IS BUT IDK, iVE NEVER BEEN THERE, PERHAPS WHEN IM DEAD MY SOULS WILL BE CHUCKED INTO IT AND THEN ILL COME BACK AND TELL YOU AFTER HAUNTING YOUR DUMD ASS AND SCARING THE SHIT OUT OF YOU, DEAL?
“ We already have adequate magnification” YEAH FOR A SHIP 10 MILES AWAY, SURE, BUT THE SUN IS MUCH MUCH FURTHER AWAY, SO TO BRING IT BACK WE STILL NEED TO DO IT THE OLD FASHIONED WAY OF CHANGING OUR HEIGHT
“I know that it has nothing to do with depth” OH REALLY , WELL IF DEPTH IS AN ANGLE, WHERE DOES THIS ANGLE END, LIKE NVER IN YOUR EMPTY BRAIN? IT JUST GOES ON FOREVER? HMM I THOUGHT THINGS CONVERGE AT THE HORIZON, SO WOULDNT THAT MEAN THAT THAT ANGLE CONVERGES TO 0 TOO? AND SINCE WE CAN SEE THE SUN , ISNT THE THING THAT CONVERGES JUST DEPTH?
“Experiential depth is from parallax” STOP MAKING UP WORDS THAT MEAN SHIT, PARRALAX IS COMPARING ONE VIWW TO ANOTHER , AND DEPTH IS NOT DUE TO YOU HAVING TWO EYES, WE WENT OVER THIS, BUT YOU HAVE THE MEMORY OF A GOAT.
“So you can’t perceive the depth of an object that is directly at your eye height? THE DIFFACTION LIMIT IS DUE TO EYE HEIGHT AND DISTANCE AWAY, NOT JUST EYE HEIGHT, OBVIUOSLY YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF DIFFACTION LIMIT IS POOR , LIKE MOST OF YOUR UNDERSTANDING, U THINK ITS JUST APPARENT SIZE
“ it isn’t what the word means and isn’t the way it is used by anyone else.” wHERE DOES IT SAY THAT THE DEFINITIONS IN THE DICTIONARY ARE PERFECT ALL THE TIME, PERHAPS YOURR CONFUSING THE DICTIONARY WITH THE bIBLE, A COMMON MISTAKE FOR CHATTLE. AT BEST I WOULD SAY THE DIC DEF IS INCOMPLETE AND LACKING ROBUSTNESS
“I know this is uncomfortable for you. I am challenging your views,” WHY DO YOU ASSUME IM UNCORMFORTABLE? IS IT BECAUSE IM USING CAPS TO DISTINGUISH MY BIG BRAINS THOUGHTS FROM YOUR LITTLE ONES? IT IT BECAUSE I CHALLANGE YOUR NUMBTY LOGIC AND EXPOSE IT AS WRONG THINK THAT YOU NEED TO PROJECT YOUR WEAKNESS ONTO ME? DOES THAWT WORK FOR YOU? WHATEVER FLOATS YOUR BOAT, ENJOY THE DENILE.
“ You do NOT have to continue it” IVE ASKED YOU 6 TIMES TO STOP BUGGING ME WITH YOUR MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF REALITY, BUT YUOR REFUSAL TO LISTEN IS INEXORABLY LINKED WITH YOUR INABILITY TO LEARN. A PROBLEM AND CHALLENGE FOR YOU THAT I WOULDNT WISH ON MY WORST ENEMY. YOU DO HAVE MY DEEPEST SYMPATHY
MY CONDESENSION IS EXACTLY WHAT IS NEEDED, IT PLACES YOU FIRMLY IN THER ROLE OF TYHE UNIFORMED, THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU BELIEVE YOUR INFORMED, AND YOURE RESISTING LEARNING, HOLDING ON TO THAT WHICH YOU THINK IS CORRECT WHEN ITS NOT. YOURE BLAMING YOUR UNWILLINGNESS TO LEARN ON ME, THATS THE PROBLEM HERE, IT DOESNT LIE WITH MY ATTITUDE, IT LIES WITH YOU AND THE SOONER YOU CAN ACCEPT THAT, THE FASDTRER YOULL BE ABLE TO MOVE ON TO TROLL SOMEONRE ELSE.
THE REASON YOU DONT UNDERSTAND OPAQUE IS BECAUSE IT IS A SCALE ,ITS NOT ON OF THOSE B&W WORDS THAT PREOPLE LIKE TO USE. iTS ONER OF THOSE WORDS I BET YOU DONT USE VERY OFTEN AND SO ARE NOT FAMILAR WITH IT PROPER APPLICATION, USE AND MEANING, AND THE DICTIONARY DOESNT DO IT JUSTICE, ITS TRUE MEANING IS ITSELF OCCULTED.
YOUR UNDERSTAND OF APPERENT IS POOR, SO YES THE GROUND APPEARS TO RISE TO THE HORIZON, BUT THAT IS BECAUSE YOUR VIEWING ANGLE TO THE REFLECTED LIGHT CHANGES. hold A CUBE UP TO YOUR EYE, NOTICE EACH ASPECT OF IT , WIDTH LENGTH DEPTH, width AND LENGTH ARE PARRALLEL, BUT DEPTH IS A PERCIEVED ANGLE. dOES THAT MEAN THAT DEPTH IS AN OPTICAL ILLUSION, THAT ITS NOT REALLY THRERE ? nO , IT IS SOLID AND REALLY THERE, LIKE WISE SO IS THE HORIZON , ITS ACTUALLY GROUND, YOU JUST PERCIEVE THE CHANGING ANGLE TO THE REFLRECTED LIGHT TILL IT BECOMES PARRALEL TO YOUR EYER HIEGHT , AT WHICH POINT DEPTH IS NO LONGER PECIEVABLE AND YOUVE REACHED "THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT" YES, THE GROUND IS OBSTRUCTING THE APPERENT ANGLE TO THE SUN, THATS WHY IT "SETS"
"apparent size is caused by..." ANGULAR RESOLUTION , AS THE ANGLE OF THE REFLECTED LIGHT APPROACHES ZERO, THE OBJECT IS UNABLE TO BE RESOVED
"The diffraction limit is the angular resolution limit - they are one and the same." i KEEP TELLING YOU THEY ARE NOT. A THREAD WILL DISPPEAR FROM YOUR EYE AFTER 10 FEET, IS THAT BECAUSE ITS REACHED ITS APPERENT SIZE LIMIT OR REACHED THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT? (ITS THE FIRST) tHE SUN IS ALWAYS BEYONG THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT, BUT ITS STILL RESOLVABLE IN 2D, length AND WIDTH, NEVER DEPTH.
YOU WANT TO DISCUSS THE OLD BOAT OVER THE HORIZON THING, THAT WHEN YOU USE A ZOOM LENES , YOU CAN SEE THE BOAT AGAIN, WELL THATS BACUSE IN THE ZOOM CAMERA , YOU REFRACTED THE HORIZON DOWN WHILE AT THE SAME TIME INCREASED THE RESOLVABILITY OF THE BOAT, THEREBY CHANGING THE ANGLE OF INCEDENT LIGHT JUST ENOUGH FOR THE OPTICS TO LET ITS REFRACTED LIGHT REACH YOUR EYE. i SUPPOSE YOU COULD DO THE SAME WITH TH SUN BUT WELL HAVE TO WAIT TILL THEY INVENT A 5000X ZOOM LENSE, MAYBE SOMETHING THATLL HAPPEN WHEN IM REINCARNATED IN 1000 YEARS, I GUESS THATS SOMETHING TO LOOK FOWARD TOO.
iF YOU DOUBT THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT IS ALSO YOUR LIMIT TO PERCIEVING DEPTH MAYBE YOU SHOULD ASK YOURSEF WHAT IS DEPTH BUT A PERCIEVED ANGLE , AN ANGLE IS BETWEEN 2 STR LINRS - THOSE LINES BEING 1. YUOR EYE HIEGHT + 2 DISTANCE TO THE OBLECT - AS THAT ANGLE APPROACHES ZERO, ITS DEPTH IS UNABL TO BE PERCIEVED , THINK OF LIGHT AS HAVING 3 DIMENSION , CEPT THAT 3RD ONE OF DEPTH SORTA HAS AN EXPIRY DATE, IT DONT WORK TO GOOD AS THE INCIDENT ANGLE APPROACHES ZERO, ITS SORT OF OVER WRITTEN BY THE OTHER 2 DIMENSIONS OF LIGHT.
aND NO I DONT THINK A THESUARAUS IS BETTER THAN A DICTIONARY, THEY BOTH HAVE EQUAL WEIGHT TO BE CONSIDERED IN UNDERSTANDING THE ENTIRE MEANING OF A WORD, YOURE JUST GUILTY OF THINKING ONE IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER, AND NOTHING IS A PILLAR OF CORRECTNESS, AT LEAST NOT IN THIS WORLD. think OF THAT WORD AS A SCALE OF OPAQUNESS, AND UNDERSTAND A CERTAIN DEFINITION MIGHT APPLY DEPENDED ON WHICH END YOU ARE LOOKING AT.
aLSO AS CONVERSATION IS BETWEEN 2 WILLING PEOPLE, THIS IS NOT WHAT THIS IS, THIS IS YOU JUST TROLLING AND ARGUING AND TO BE HONEST, ITS KINDA RAPEY AND STALKING, PLZ STOP.
OF BROTHER, I THOUGHT I BLOCKED YOUR RETARDED ASS, OPAQUE MEANS TRANLUCENT , THE GROUND IS NON OPAQUE, JUST CAUSE IM USING CAPS DOESNT MEAN IM YLLING, IM JUST DOING IT TO ANNOY YOU. AND ITS WORKING.
THE GROUND APPEARS TO BE OPTICALLY RISING, THAT DOESNT MEAN THE GROUND IS REALLY RISING OR IT'S AN OPTICAL ILLUSION, IT MEANS YOU DONT UNDERSTASND WHAT APPERENT IS, THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING , ITS YOUR DUMB ASS THAT IS MISCONSTRUEING APPERNT AND ILLUSION
OF COURSE THE GROUND CAN BLOCK THINGS - CAN YOU SEE THE GROUND BELOW IT, WELL WHATS BLOCKING IT - OH THE OTHER GROUND, DUDE YOU ARE SO FING THICK./
"The diffraction limit is the distance where you stop being able to resolve an object." WRONG - YOUR DESCRIBING THE APPERNT SIZE LIMIT OF AN OBJECT, YOU DONT UNDERSTASND WHAT THE DIFFRACTRION LIMT IS - CAUSE YOUR IQ IS SMALLER THAN YOUR SHOE SIZE
THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT IS BASED ON YOUR EYE HEIGHT, NOT JUST DISTANCE AWAY FROM IT, SO WHEN YOU USE A ZOOM LENSE, YOUV CHANGED YOUR EYE LENSE, SO U CHANGED THE DISTANCE, DUH
THE DIFFACTION LIMIT (AKA THE HORIZON) IT S NOT JUST AT THAT LINE, ITS ALL AROUND YOU IN 360 DECREES, NOT IS IT THE END OF ALL SIGHT, ITS THE LIMIT OF PERCIEVING DEPTH. iF IT WAS THE LIMIT OF ALL SIGHT AS YOU SUGGEST, @ LETS SAY 10 MILES , AND IT EXISTS ALL AROUND YOU (NOT JUST AT THE HORIZON, HOW DO YOU SEE THE SEE THE SUN ABOVE YOU AT NOON , IS THE SUN WITHIN THE DEFRACCTION LIMIT? i DONT THINK SO, (I KNOW YOU WONT FIGURE IT OUT CAUSE THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT IS THE LIMIT OF YOU PERCIEVING DEPTH, NOT THE LIMIT OF SIGHT).
i THINK THE POPLE THAT CALL fLAT eARTH A PSYOP ARE THE PSYOP WHERE THEY GET STUPID UNKNOWING PEOPLE TO JUST REPEAT STUPID THINGS - KINDA LIKE WHAT YOUR DOING....
i HAVENT STRUGGLED ONE BIT, YOUVE STRUGGLED TO UNDERSTAND THE REAL INFO , CAUSE YOUR SO INDORTRINASTED WITH PSYOP INFO. iTS NOT MY PRIDE THAT IS ONE THE LINE HERE - DID I SAY SOEWWHRE IN MY POST THAT I WANTED TO TEACH IDIOTS LIKE YOU TO LEARN HOW TO THINK CORRECTLY, NAW YOUR JUST HERE TO WASTE MY TIME, STOP FOOLING YOURSELF.
"You began this conversation" - WOW SEE THIS IS HOW STUPID YUO ARE - SO YOU THINK I COMMENTED ON MY OWN VIDEO ABOUT HOW WRONG IT IS - ARE YOU REALLY THIS DELUSIONAL - I THINK THIS MUST BE THE CASE. nO YOU BEGAN THIS CONV, CAUSE YOURE A SHILL AND AN IDIOT. sO IF YOU WANT TO QUESTION THE TRUE MEANING OF OPAQUE, THEN WHY ARE SNYOMS FOR THAT WORD ambiguous arcane cryptic dark deep Delphic double-edged elliptical elliptic enigmatic enigmatical equivocal fuliginous inscrutable murky mysterious mystic nebulous obscure occult
sO LETS SAY YOU HAD A BALL OF LIGHT , AND YOU DROPPED IT IN SOME SHALLOW BUT STILL" MURKY" WATER , WOULD YOU NOT STILL SEE SOME OF THAT LIGHT, IS THE WATER NOT MURKY , OR HAS A DEGREE OF TRANSPARANCY. sEE THINGS ARE NEITHER BLACK NOR WHITE, THEY ARE BUT SHADES OF UNDERSTANDING., AND THAT UNDERSTANDING IS ALWAYS GREY. YOUVE MUCH TO LEARN. jUST STOP BOTHERING ME.
"The rising of that non opaque ground is an optical illusion, how can an optical illusion physically block light? Can you demonstrate this on a smaller scale? If not, why not?" The ground is non opaque , opaque being translucent or see though, it optically rising, is not an optical illusion, it is apparent, thats the way you perceive depth , at an angle of the incident light. Can i demonstrate that things are occulted by the horizon - holy - how retarded are you to even ask?
no , i dont need things repeated, you do, cause "idiot"
"he diffraction limit IS the distance at which objects (the distance depends on the size of the object) shrink to dots, then become fuzzy dots, and then disappear." wrong - that apparent size - as ive already said - apparent size and the diffraction limit are not the same thing, stop conflarting the 2. When you zoom ion on the boat - YOUR NOT USING YOUR EYE , YOUR USING ANOTHER LENSE WITH DIFFRENT OPTICS - DAHHHHH
NO MY UNDERWTANDING OF DIFFRACTION LIMIT IS NOT UNIQU TO ME , YOU JUST DONT KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU THINK IT HAS TO DO WITH APPERENT SIZE - IT DOESNT.
dUUDE fLAT eARTH IS NOT THE pSYOP. ITS DUMB PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT THINK THEY KNOW SHIT WHEN THE DONT KNOW FUCK THAT IS THE PSYOP, SO YOU ARE THE PSYOP.
PLEASE GET IT THOUGH YOUR THICK SKULL , DONT EVER MSG ME, YOUR TOO DUMB TO LEARN ANYYTHING, YOU ARE A TROLL AND A STALKER, YOU ARE SICK IN THR HEAD, YOU ARE THE MOST IDIOTIC PERSON IVE EVER TALKD TOO AND IVE TALKED TO MILLIONS. CAN I JUST BLOCK YOU, I THINK IMA TRY THAT CAUSE I THINK YOUR TOO STUPID TO STOP REPEATING THINGS LIKE A BROKEN RECORD. fOR THE LOVE OF GOD , GO AWAY.
What is blocking the light? The rising optical non opaque ground that ends at your eye height, thats why the background becomes occulted
"You are positively obsessed with “depth”. Depth is in no way required to see the angular size of objects distant or very close. Why on earth do you think it is? - this is what you doo all the time, irs your signature - you misunderstand something i said and then blame me for making you your brain fart. Depth is a part of everything you see before the horizon, thats just fact, reality, its not my obsession and you. Your example it just ridiculous cause i dont think you could ever see a car past the horizon , and even if you could, the item is still very close as compared to the distance to the stars so for yousa to expect they would act the same way is just more proof at how hard headed you are.
"It (diffraction limit/angular resolution limit) is the distance limit where the view of distant objects shrink to a dot (then becoming a fuzzy dot) and then disappear." you just contradicted yourself by saying of course they are different things and then stating how they are the same, good grief, see the problem is youre such a logical hypocrite, sorta like an illogical lefty, and then youre like "why cant you handle my faults?" Oh yes its must be my problem.....sure Dude, your hopeless.
Objects can become too apparently small to see well before the diffraction limit, and just because an object has reached the diffraction limit, doesnt mean it will shrink to a dot.
"It comes from having two vantage points a known distance apart from one another and comparing the different images." wrong - you can perceive depth from one vantage point, comparing two will show you its parallax. your confusing a common term and misapplying it with what im talking about. So hold a cube up to your eye, identify all 3 aspects of its width height and depth. Now take a photo of it, Did the cube's aspect of depth disappear? NO, even though its only technically a 2d image, you still perceive the aspects of the cubes depth. g Depth to the stars can be "calculated , but only if you make certain assumption, which are not true. The closeness of your ey.es doesnt prevent you from seeing the aspect "called depth" because the object in question is beyond the diffraction limit, so depth never reaches your eyes.
naw , some of us dont need parroting, but im sure you always will. Im just trying to tell you facts you demonstrated here, why cant you just accept the truth and move on, do you have a problem with reality?
my video does not say perspective causes sunsets, it say occultation does. Your "interpretation" is not based on anything i say, it based on your sad misunderstanding of just about everything. Talking to you is stressful, u never learn. Im not the black hole here. If i was the one "learning" i wouldn't debate the host with repeated parrotings, like you are.
im super cool, YOU HAVE NOT CONSIDERED THAT YOURE WRONG AND PROJECTING ONTO ME. A TACTIC FROM DISINFO TROLLS LIKE YOURSELF
" the diffraction limit depends on the size of the object as well as the receptor density in the eye." WRONG - THR APPERENT SIZE OF AN OBJCT MAY DISSAPPEAR TO YOUR EYES BECAUSE OF INBILTY TO FOCUS ON IT , WELL BEFORE THE DIFFRACRTION LIMIT
". If the horizon were the diffraction limit - this would not be possible" THE HORIZON IS THE DIFFACTION LIMIT , IT EXISTS ALL AROUND YOU IN A SPHERE , IT IS NOT THE limit OF ALL SIGHT, IT IS THE LIMIT OF PERCIEVING DEPTH, THERE ARE STILL 2 OTHER DIMENSIONS U CAN PERCIEVE, THOSE BEING LENGTH AND WIDTH
"They do shrink to dots and disappear as they approach the diffraction limit and go beyond it."
APPERENT SIZE ANF DIFFACTION LIMIT ARE NOT THE SAME THING, THE DIFFRACTION LIMIT ENDING WOULD NOT CAUSE AN OBJECT FROM 10 MILES AWAT TO SHINK, IM NOT SAYING THAT, YOU ARE , ONCE AN OBJECT IS ACTUALLY OCCULTED, THE ONLY WAY TO BRING IT BACK IS TO RAISE YOUR VIEWING HEIGHT
" But real/actual depth perception comes from parallax "
WRONG - YOU ARE COMPARING ONE DEPTH PERCEPTION TO A SECOND EXAMPLE OF DEPTH PERCEPION, THAT DOESNT CREATE DEPTH OR DEPTH PERCEPTION, ITS SIMPLY A COMPARISON. aS TO WHY THERE IS NO NOTIBLE PARRALAX IN THE STARS IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO PERCIEVABLE DEPTH, GET THAT THOUGH YOUR THICK SKULL, SOON - LIKE THIS YEAR
"Repetition is necessary for effective communication."
YA - FOR IDIOTS LIKE YOURSELF
WHERE'S THE POST THAT MY GOAL IS TRYING TO CONVINCE IDIOTS OF A THING, IM NOT. there IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO EVER CHANGE, NOTHING. YOU WILL DIE AN IDIOT - 100% POSITIVE.
here aNH EXAMPLE OF YOUR CRAZY
"I’m not “new on the block”, i’ve encountered the claim that perspective is responsible for sunset many times before - it is very common."
iM NOT SAYING "PERSCPECTIVE" CAUSE SUNSETS, STOP PUTTING YOUR STUPID IN MY MOUTH, THIS IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW YOURE WRONG KEEPS GROWING EXPEMENTIOALLY THE LONGER I TALK TO YOU, YOU ARE A BLACK HOLE OF ERROR
ANOTHER WALL OF WRONG, FROM THE TROLL DESPERATE 4 Attention not wasting my time dealing with your crazy
nice wall of wrong u created
“There is no plane/direction/dimension in which objects don’t appear smaller as they recede.” 1 wrong – is an airplane 15 miles above you on the same plane as you, if you think so – you dony understand words “because width is linear not circular.” 2 - i never said it was circular, circular is not even a dimension, so put the crack pipe down and listen and stop making up shit “Do you honestly believe that the sun (and ships, and anything else that appears to set “over the horizon”) is really NOT increasing distance from the observer as it moves?” 3 i never said that = stop using your bird skill to make up shit r i never said, your limit of depth is all around you, if you think th horizon is the limit of ALL sight, you would never be able to see the sun , cause itsa always further away than that distance, hence it is never perceived in 3d 4 “yes, apparent size change with perspective last forever? Wrong – stars are only perceived in 2d – right ascension and declination , or length and width, i dont care what you think, its wrong – all of astronomy knows this already. “Astronomers talk about/calculate the distances” 5 assumption to do calculations are NOT PERCEPTION, dahhhhhhhhhhh “ The sky is not 2D even if our plotting system for locating things in it was (which it also isn’t, it is conceived to be a spherical grid” 6 of course its only ever perceived in 2d, u assume the 3rd dimension and then tell yourself your not assuming anything, cause not too smart. Let me give you an example, ok i got these two pennies, but just imaging its a big pile of coins, i can cgi draw you a big pile of coins , i can also calculate what that pile is worth – now how much are you going to pay for this big pile of coins? Im only asking for 1000$ - its a bargain for such a huge pile.... “You doubt that planes change apparent size as they recede away from you? 7 your the one making the positive claim they should – show me some video of the iss changing size as it crosses the sky and gets bigger as it goes overhead of you, waiting.... “You seem to be confusing depth and size. “ 8 – projection, u do “ one eye, no depth” 9 – wrong , u still perceive depth with one eye, u just cant handle the fact it ends at the horizon, cause denile is the basis for your space monkey religion (you can drop the stupid claim your a flat earthr, youre not fooling anyone) “blah blah blah” so you cant prove that with you claim but are going to rage for 4 pages of derp if someones tell you how silly and utterly wrong that which you were taught to parrot is wrong ? LooooooolL, your tears are delicious. “but light ALWAYS refracts when the refractive index changes. “ 10 – ok whats the refractive index for Air like .0003? cOMPARED TO WATER WHICH IS LIKE .3? sO IN YOUR EXAMPLE THIS LIGHT GOING THROUGH .0003148975 REFRACTIVE INDEX GOES THOUGH .000314874, ReFECTIVE INDX OVER 4 MILeS – HOW MUCH CUrVE DO YOU SEE? Hit me with your maths dude
“ I was just mentioning that many scientists and textbook authors define it that way. 11 citation needed
“There are no “globr” explanations” 12 – wrong – thy make me vomit with disgust on being so ignorant of reality
“Refraction does occur in our air, “ no it doesnt and if or when it does – it because of drastic changes in air and the amount that happens is NEVER noticeable “i care about what is actually happening.” 13 – ok if u really do , than air doesnt cause ANY noticeable refraction, EVER. ALSO YOUR DEPTH Perception ENDs AT THE DIFFRACTION LiMIT , AKA THE HORIZOn., which exists all around you “ The diffraction limit has nothing to do with depth. It happens with monocular vision” 14 wrong , ill prove it .hold up a cube, say 1 foot from your eye , identify each dimension of the cube. Now close one eye, did depth disappear, no! The diffraction limit is because the reflected light that allows you to preserve thast dimension is no longer able to reach your eyes or eye. “ the chief one that most are familiar with is parallax. “ 16 wrong , your comparing your depth perception in one eye and comparing the depth perception in the other eye , u dont need 2 eyes to perceive depth “I think i get it, and have encountered and considered such ideas before. I also think it is clearly wrong,” 17 – no you demonstrated how you dont get it and you've never encountered it before – citation or have you just gon back to amk stuff up and just hoping i wont notice? “Closing one eye doesn’t make anything disappear “ Correct, but congrats on contradicting your self, when you said one eye – no depth, lol “ I have seen such demonstrations as well and the cause is likely (once again) refraction “
18 word salad explanation, depth is not a change in med I have seen such demonstrations as well and the cause is likely (once again) refraction ium, therefore refraction cant be occuring, the problem here s again – you demonstrated you dont know what the word refraction is , and you use it like a rent A nurse to cover up your booboo. Plz – grow up. “If “perception” were the cause, then magnification could restore the “occulted” portion.” 19 “perception is never the cause of anything, and you can zoom in on what you thought was the horizon and see a boat is still there “Repetition is, alas, necessary for effective communication.” wrong, u can only get stupid people to parrot you, thats not what i need and why i believe talking to you is non productive.
Also dont reply and waste my time or ill just report you for trolling, Learn it or dont - i dont care, just stop pretending you know it already cause yoiu dont.
“Plane has nothing to do with it.” - wrong “Perspective occurs in all directions/dimensions.” correct “If something gets farther away from you, it will appear smaller.” correct, something 1 foot away from you moving to 100 feet away will get smaller, but what if that thing is already 100 feet away from you and moves along as dimension that is not depth , let say width, should it still get smaller as it does so? No. Does this apparent size change with perspective last forever? No. Thats why thing in the sky are only refereed to in 2 dimensions , Right Ascension and Declination or Length and width, never depth. “we can perceive the apparent size difference of things in the sky (such as planes) as they recede as well. Nice baseless claim, please show me a shot of the iss crossing the sky with showing apparent size change. Cant do that , how bout a spy plane already at 15 miles high, plz i wont hold my breath while yuo make up crap. “any light traveling from one medium to another with a differing refraction index does refract” wrong, a slight density charge is not enough to cause refraction. Air does not cause any noticeable refraction, Lets say your viewing something from 3 miles away, and its fuzzy, thats not refraction, thats atmospheric diffraction, refraction is the distinct angling of light, when it YOUR PERCEPTION of light over distance, thats caused by atmospheric diffraction. “diffraction and refraction - they are one and the same.” wrong, refraction is the angling of light, Diffusion is the spreading out of light at a point, and diffraction is the spreading out of light over distance. “Wether we call the phenomenon of the light being curved convexly towards the ground as refraction or diffraction doesn’t change its reality at all.” Well i suppose in causal conversation it would matter but you making specific claims and using the globr explanation of “light being curved convexly towards the ground” due to refraction , when that is not whats going on at all. This slippery slope false explanation allows glob'rs to claim things are magically refracted up, when they are not.
When i say “perceived in 2d” that doesnt mean they are actually 2d, there is a limit to our perception. Thee fact we have two eyes doesn't change whether something is perceived in 3d or 2d, distance to object does, that's why its called “the diffraction Limit”, depth no longer diffracts, because that aspect of the reflected light is unable to reach our eyes.
“the horizon (the distance limit of our vision through air)” wrong, its not the limit to All Vision, its the Limit to depth, the other 2 dimensions of length and width are still perceivable.
Ill say this part again – things in the sky (like the Sun + moon) are only Perceived in 2d, when the sun meets the optical limit for perceiving Depth ( the optically rising non opaque ground your standing on that goes so until the horizon) that sky is then occulted or blocked or hidden from our view. Its actually so simple to get once you get it.
“ It sounds like your explanation may not be demonstrable/testable” not true, I've seen demonstration of this with camera showing this effect on objects that's say as few inches tall at 100 feet away, that the bottom becomes occulted or “disappears” not because it went over any physical curve, because our perception of depth ends
Also, it wonderful to talk to you, but lets end this on a good note, learn what you can, but i find your just repeating what you think you know try to make learning into a debate, thats not really helpful and im not into building a wall of misunderstanding, but i hope you rewatch the video a few times until you get it , gl.
wow, i read some dumb shit in my life but that has to be the most rambling incoherent word vomit ever posted. How do you function in Life? Im guessing your mom still needs to wipe your butt. I guess its my fault, i thought i was dealing with an adult, but youre like a psychotic child. Sorry.