0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

This guy thinks jeffrey epstein did nothing wrong

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which you refuse to abide by except pro jew arguments. They get a pass even when committing crimes on the platform

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

The context is you censor anything you don't personally like and allow things you do, even if they are criminal.

So how many times have you censored posts about epsteins connections to mossad?

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

It doesn't matter what the fuck you say. I'm ascribing intent. You used the word "jew" derogatorily. Censor yourself.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

Then you are taking responsibility for the criminal acts which you allow while calling the lm "jokes".

Why can't me calling people jews be a "joke"?

Because YOU'RE a fucking joke. Fucking hypocrite. Subversive rule breaking punk. Criminal.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are encouraging criminal behavior by calling it a "joke" while in the same breath censoring me for ostensibly NOT breaking the rules. You cannot ascribe intent. You despicable hypocrite.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

You cannot ascribe intent to anything I do and especially while encouraging literal criminal behavior.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are an accomplice by encouraging criminal behavior and censoring me for something that is absolutely not against the rules.

Enforce the rules.

You used the word jew. Remove yourself.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's funny how you can pick and choose how ascribe intent.

If I say something that is absolutely NOT a slur you conflate it as one. Unless you're saying being a jew is reprehensible on its face.

Yet. When a jew literally commits a crime that will land them in prison you not only allow it but encourage it and become an accomplice to that crime by calling it a "joke".

I would like you to do your job, please, and enforce the rules and laws the website is subject to. That is, unless you think your job is to censor any mention of yahwehs chosen child molesters while aiding and abetting criminals... if they're jews.

Is demanding personally identifying information against the rules? Yes or no? Is demanding payment information illegal? Yes or no?

2
DavidColeIntrepid 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do you think it's a slur? Is abducting children and trafficking them to politicians a bad thing?

What about demanding personal information like credit card data? Are literal crimes that will send you to prison against the rules here or just maybe, possibly, potentially hurting the feelings of the protected classes?

-2
DavidColeIntrepid -2 points ago +1 / -3

What's worse? Gargling the dicks of people who murdered your supposed lord or calling people goddamned retards?

Grow up you ideologically illiterate God damned goofball.

2
DavidColeIntrepid 2 points ago +2 / -0

The CIA recruits heavily from Mormons for a number of reasons.

1
DavidColeIntrepid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zero evidence

Which is exactly what you have for the moon landing

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

Let's do a little thought experiment to help you understand this logical fallacy.

I'm going to assert that you're a faggot. So, either you provide physical evidence which proves you're not or I win.

Do you see how that just doesn't work? You're going to have to start asking some hard questions about space travel or admit you're gay and suck a dick, faggot.

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +1 / -1

lying about a man’s death

Not a random person. THE secretary of defense who DID warn the public about "advanced flying vehicles from the polar regions".

The official story is he committed suicide. If you're stupid enough to believe that then you're stupid enough to believe kash patel about jeffrey epstein.

physically incapable of disproving

That's not true and I don't even have to. You don't prove a negative. That's not how logic works. YOU need to provide evidence in the affirmative that those tapes showed what you assert they do. which you can't because everyone here speaks English and understands that whatever evidence you think you had has been destroyed, if it ever existed in the first place.

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you think after warning the public about "advanced flying vehicles from the polar regions" that secretary of defense James Forrestal threw himself out of a window of bethesda naval hospital the you probably believe kash patel about jeffrey epstein not doing anything too.

Where's your evidence?

They taped over it

Sure, kid

-3
DavidColeIntrepid -3 points ago +1 / -4

You don't know shit about the secret space program. You don't know shit about the Ahnenerbe. You don't know shit about Maria Orsic. You don't know shit about Vril or Thule. You don't know shit about operation highjump. You don't know shit about Admiral Byrd.

You don't know your own ass from a hole in the ground.

You're going to come to a realization that some people know a lot more than you do. What are you, a negress in a movie theater? It would behoove you to shut the fuck up and listen when the adults are talking.

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +2 / -3

You're obviously aggravated. Why don't you take a little nap? Get your little juice box, take a midol, and get back to me when you're ready to have a rational conversation like a big boy.

Ok, snookums?

view more: Next ›