1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

The report produced by NIST is much more qualified in mechanical engineering than anything you or anyone else here can lie about on the internet. This is a collection of engineers saying this, not me.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still waiting for supposed “truthers” only interested in the truth to actually respond to this other than saying that “I don’t care about facts that ruin my conspiracy theory!”

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes dude, that’s how gravity affects the twin towers when a giant jet smashes into it and causes a fire. Again, why are you acting like I’m the one saying shit that doesn’t make sense when you think hologram planes were used and the building was rigged for demolition with no one noticing? Was Lucky Larry just out of sight pushing down a giant looney tunes TNT detonator too?

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because that’s how gravity works dude, you’re the one just making up shit concerning physics (something none of you are at all experts in) along with other kooky stuff to make your conspiracy to make sense.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s for attention in that I’m calling attention to just how hallow this specific conspiracy theory is, how it’s built on a foundation of quick sand and lies and how it cannot stand up to open discussion. My goal is to prevent otherwise intelligent people from falling for this because its ultimately bad for America for Americans to believe the worst attack on civilians in a terrorist plot is from our own government and not from hostile foreign Islamic extremist. I mean if made the point about Atta attending flight school ect and the first response I got was saying that they don’t care about that, what a fucking joke.

I believe that Osama bin Laden conspired with others like KSM to carry out this attack.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your explanation isn’t true, this is insane. You just keep asking leading questions that aren’t based in reality. For the love of God just try to venture out of your conspiracy bubble and try to research this for real instead of falling back on shitty back of napkin engineering takes and made up nonsense.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Literally none of what you said is true. This is the “truther” method; remain completely ignorant and then just make shit up lol.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do “truthers” act like a giant jet plane crashing into a tower, starting a fire and the the tower collapsing is so unbelievable? It’s like making yourself retarded on purpose to make your conspiracy theory make sense.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one ever said jet fuel melts steel beams, this is just a strawman “truthers” repeat since they have no actual argument

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well your opinion doesn’t really matter when it comes to reality.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

“ I was barely alive when this happened so I haven't investigated this aspect and don't really care.”

The average “truther” in action, outright proudly claiming their ignorance. Anything to keep safe the previous conspiracy theory. You are a fool.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

Once again, you are comparing apples to oranges. What other building had Boeing 767 or any other large jet plane smash into it at full speed? This is a completely unique event in history so trying to compare it to other instances of buildings that suffer fires or something isnt a solid argument at all.

For the towers, they suffered catastrophic damage on the levels where the planes hit, and this spread jet fuel which ignited and started a fire. The structural damage coupled with the fires which weakened (not melted steel beams like the strawman argument claims) caused the section to collapse which in turn caused the building to collapse.

Heres another question, why do "truthers" only talk about Building 7? Why not building 5 or 6 which also suffered catastrophic damage from falling debris from the towers?

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

I will also liked to point this out considering how often I see "truthers" point out convent coincidences. Im genuinely interested in your responses to these questions.

1.) Why did Mohamed Atta , Abdulaziz al-Omari, Wail al-Shehri , Waleed al-Shehri , Satam al-Suqami all attend flight schools in Florida immediately after they entered into the United States in 2000 on the claim that they were all seeking jobs in the middle east as commercial pilots?

2.) Why did Atta, the leader of the hijackers, receive a wire transfer to pay for all of their flight school cost from Ammar al-Baluchi, Khalid Sheik Muhammed nephew? Is it just a coincidence that the mastermind behind the 1993 WTC bombing and his nephew sent money for these guys to attend flight school?

3.) Why did they all have multiple hours of flight training, including solo flight hours, and earn commercial pilots license from the FAA?

4.) Why is there a record of Atta going to the Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport to train on their Boeing 767 simulator and why did he order training videos on all classes of 767 planes from Boeing itself?

5.) Why is Atta on security camera at Portland International Jetport the morning of September 11, 2001 and why did he board American Airlines Flight 11?

-2
Cyber1776 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Pointing to this building or that building burning and not collapsing is comparing apples to oranges. What other building had a fucking Boeing 767 crash into them at full speed and leak fuel all over? Or in the case of building 7, what other building had huge chunks of burning debris from an even taller adjacent building crash into them?

Why is the fact that these building suffered fires on top of catastrophic structural damage so hard for "truthers" to grasp? You guys have to pull this reverse Occom's razor and concoct the most absurd and convoluted theories (all without any actual proof of course) when the reality is pretty fucking simple. Terrorist hijacked planes and then flew them into buildings.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Incoherent ramblings and name calling is not an argument.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure thing schizo, all you do is seeth about jews to the point where you think anyone that triggers you simply by not agreeing with your retarded takes is a jew agent. Stay mad lol.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your entire existence is based around being triggered by Jews and that Nazis got BTFO in WW2.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +2 / -2

That’s literally the way the OP post described it you illiterate trash.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +2 / -2

White genocide caused by international usury, yeah what a totally level headed take lol. You guys believe in the most childish comic book villain shit ever and project it all onto others. Literally retard stuff.

-4
Cyber1776 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Do you guys ever become self aware of ironically using terms like “boogeyman” to describe Germany and overall viewing WW2 and this comic book good guy vs bad guy scenario when you then put forth a theory that is exactly that, but just with the good guy bad guy roles reversed?

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +2 / -1

He is very obviously referring to the 1993 WTC bombing that was orchestrated by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the same guy that oversaw the 9/11 attacks. Its like "truthers" are incapable of taking in and processing very easy to understand information. They just look for keywords and then morph it into their head to mean something totally different for their god awful confirmation bias.

"dont forget that took a big bomb in the basement...and it withstood that and I got to see that about three of four days after it took" is what he says.

3
Cyber1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Back in 2013 when Ukraine was having its low level civil war against eastern separatist, their military was a useless husk, so all these private miltia units were built up with the backing of Ukraine riches oligarchs and with the approval of the Ukrainian government. The Azov Battalion was one of these militias and its main backer was oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who was also a governor of a region under attack. He supported Azov, along with others, but mainly Azov so that they could protect important state run oil facilities that he had money invested in from being taken over by separatist.

Kolomoisky also owns a lot of stake in the entertainment industry of Ukraine, and Zelensky got his start as a comedian on shows Kolomoisky produced. Kolomoisky took him under his wing at a certain point and was the main backer of Zelenskys campaign as well.

2
Cyber1776 2 points ago +4 / -2

you latch on to one scientific fact and ignore the rest of the variables involved This is the horrible confirmation bias that a lot of conspiracy tards employ.

3
Cyber1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

Do other conspiracy theorist feel embarrassed about their views when they see retards say shit like space if fake or the earth is flat?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›