2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who we are to judge them? If it is their way, let them go through it and deal with it.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. Could say the same about place where I live. Never closed the car near my home or groceries around. I take the keys out ignition only because my car with inserted key have some systems running and draining battery, which will be a problem if it will stay so for few days.

It's only about quality of people living around, not about whatever globalist control they try to push.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

One warning - do not occasionally overthrow America, overthrowing (((America))). We nearly made this mistake, and there is nothing good in it.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Enormous amount of starlink terminals with computers with AFU coordination software was seized since Musk began send terminals to Ukraine. They are used for monitoring enemy plans and movements through this AFU system and to control quality of Starlink jamming in moments of advances or sorties. Also, they are fine for running whatever p2p networks like i2p or other to establish non-critical communications between different Russian groups.

Using enemy equipment (if suitable) is not something unusual at all. At least in Russian military concepts.

Since Musk is unable to detect which terminals actually belong to Russians now, the options is either to shut down Starlink over Ukraine, either allow us to use it. :) Whatever decision Musk or his handlers will choose, both are perfectly fine for us and do damage to AFU.

Strange, that this thing about Starlink popped up only now. Starlink terminals used by us since the first days they appeared on the frontline and was seized by Russian troops. It is almost two-years old story. May be you could remember a more than a year old story about hacking into AFU field coordination system. Some MSM even then mentioned it as one of reasons of "great Ukrainian counter-offensive" failure. That's about starlink terminals in our hands too - this AFU system includes starlink terminal and AFAIK locked to the IPs of AFU command and starlink terminals.

So, why now? Revenge of neocons toward Musk for providing platform for Carlson-Putin interview?

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, that's the level of degeneracy. ANN is pretty universal thing, you could train a model for nearly anything that have a static correspondence between inputs and outputs. Say, if you calculating sin(x) with some limited precision, say 4 decimal digits, you could train ANN to do that. Efficiency will be bad, but who cares today about efficiency?

It resembles me when DSP become cheap and some "progressive" university graduates in electronics began to propose making something like fucking low-pass filter for audio signal (which is a resistor and capacitor) using dedicated DSP IC. :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

ANN libraries are very easy to adopt. F.e. with Python TensorFlow library you could literally be up and running in minutes. There are even tons of examples for using it with pretrained models that are freely available around, and there are tons of them.

Make something in your business to use ANN library and that's it - your business using "AI"!!! Make ads and presentations mentioning that you using "AI" and you are in a club. Even if that ANN library just used in a natural language input enchancement nobody really use for calculator for something (IDK, bed cost from size or number of planks for fence) on your site.

Since investors and customers was thoroughly brainwashed about "AI", this spreaded like flame.

ANN libraries are not very complex thing to write. Training models is harder (in terms of time and volume), but there was more than enough grants for that and even volunteers who did it.

That is how cyberpunk we fully deserved looks like.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Handing over something with stuff around is insecure. Disappearing from their view in such a place like Kremlin is also questionable. You can't be shure for 100% in other people.

Also, you might have missed a smile in a title.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you heard about Pale of Settlement in Russian Empire? Jews was not allowed to live outside Pale of Settlement. Uman, Dnepropetrovsk and Odessa was towns where most Jews live at the time. In Uman is some rabbi grave. It is a place of piligrimage of some Jewish sect. Jewish Ukrainian government provide security and assistance for them. This will not be the case if or when Uman will be liberated by Russia. Most probably, Jews will flee from scary awful Russain orcs to the elven West or whatever.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The owners generally transfer some of their personal assets to the business entity and receive some share of the business, often somewhat relative to the amount of assets they provided to the business (other assets such as talent, personal networks, etc. are not as tangible but still factor into the share each person gets).

Exactly same it works here. You could add something to the "authorized capital" of enterprise anything you want as owner. Even do that not only at moment of business creation. But you (or your business entity) become an owner or co-owner of that business.

Theoretically, yes, I just looked into our laws, one business could "invest" something into another business "authorized capital", and yes, you will not pay any taxes for such "ownership transfer". But, as side-effect, first business will become a co-owner of that another business proportional to the share of "investment" among total "authorized capital".

Also, just a note, when selling the plane, there are not necessarily tax implications. If you have been amortizing your expense claims based on the expected lifetime of the asset, then you have only paid taxes on the depreciated value of the asset, and the sale amount is likely the remaining value on that asset, and therefore no profit and thus no taxes on that sale.

Here we have something similar. You could "write off" some equipment or adjust its price in business assets balance proportional to the part of manufacturer declared lifetime that passed.

Also, you could theoretically sell something below market price but that makes sense only if you pay taxes from profit (13%), not from turnover (6%) - we have both options for LLCs and other types of businesses. And it could attract unnecessary attention from tax agency, especially if it was something expensive. Not fatal, and could be settled, but unpleasant.

Interesting, thanks for clarifications. I appreciate your patience.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some Russian pierogies for the road?

Pirogi is too large even for this file, they are different from Polish pierogi and could not be easily flattened. You had to choose Russian pancakes. But I didn't noticed a jar of honey, varenie (jam), sguschenka (sweet condensed milk), caviar or pickled mushrooms which are inseparable from Russian pancakes. :)

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

I didn't heard anything I didn't already know in this interview, but things like above was interesting to see and notice.

Also, f.e. it was clear that Tucker was completely unprepared for such intellectual discussion. Putin didn't fit into his way of interviewing. It's funny that such manner of telling stories is very common in Russia, like "wait, I just started, let me tell the whole story, I'll eventually come to the topic". It is perfectly fine here, especially in long winter evening with some vodka, pickles and stove cooked dishes, when two or more people have a long and thoughtful conversation, but looks like it is completely alien to Tucker itself and his audience in general. Some cultural differences, many omit from equation.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

But isn't Tucker Carlson the son of a CIA agent who applied to the CIA himself and supposedly "wasn't hired."

And Putin openly mocked Calson twice on that.

Putin openly promotes the "evil nazi" Holohoax lies and markets WWII as "saving jews from the evil white nazi white nationalists" lie.

Not really. Even in interview talking about WWII he never mentioned Holocaust and mentioned Jews in line with Russians and Poles as usual people, not some "choosen" ones.

Despite some common mistake holocaust myth is not in any laws or whatever in Russia. One of most hated by jews "holocaust denier" Jurgen Graf live in Russia for a long time since he had to search for asylum from Western persecution. And as far as I know he is perfectly fine here and live in Moscow with his Belorussian wife.

We don't know everything about the game between different NWO factions, why Jewish question never used by any of them (yet?) and so on. But we could observe interactions (preferrably from uncommon points of view) and derive interesting things about what is happening.

The Ukraine war itself is just about greedy jews expanding and instituting the Greater Israel project.

I don't see how it is about "Greater Israel" at all. It is definitely driven by Jews who religiously hate Russians even if some Russians are convinced that they are "Ukrainians", Jews perfectly know that they are Russians, so this war to kill as many hated Russians as they could.

As for "Greater Israel" in Ukraine it is just a nonsence and I don't know who and for what reason drive that shit. Khazarian Kaganate capital (Itil) and center was somewhere near modern Astrakhan, where Volga flows into Caspian sea. In the best case, Khazarian Kaganate borders was in middle of modern Lugansk and Donetsk regions, and in no way had anything with modern Ukraine remnants. Destroyed Khasarian Kaganate is fully on the territory of modern Russia. If Jews have plans about restoring their Khazarian Kaganate, they had already failed. Even if there will be huge influx of Jewish refugees into Russia (which I don't observe and don't see it possible at all), they would be redirected into Jewish Autonomous Oblast on the border with China on the far East.

As for Jewish oligarchs in Russia, I have to admit that their positions are heavily undermined in Russia, and mostly not by efforts of Putin, but by the West. The Abramovich story only could give a clue about what happening with them. Jewish oligarchs from Russia had too much trust to the West so kept all their wealth there. After imposing sanctions, they had no any option to preserve their wealth than to cut their ties with Russia and Russian leadership.

Putin, as Soviet KGB agent, is a heavy internationalist, so he use "nazi" argument a lot and supress Russian nationalism. In the past, Jews used that in their eternal war with Russians, and Russians was the only ones who persecuted for "spreading ethnic hatred", but now situation changed, Jewish NGOs was thrown out or flee, and now that "spreading ethnic hatred" charges used against tribal gangs from Causasus, muslim separatists, even against Jews themselves.

Unlike Western meaning of "Nazi", Russian one does not necessary include "jews" in that term. That is why you see a lot of amusings of Western sheeple or propagandists about "Ukrainians can't be nazis, they have Jewish president". It is kind of cultural mismatch in the meaning of propaganda labels. In Russia, "Nazi" is not the one who question Jews. It is the one who hate and want to exterminate all other etnicities except his own. Purely artificial propaganda thing, but it is different from Western one.

Putin, in his situation have to balance on the thin and fiery edge between NWO masters and Russia as historic phenomenon and even Russian people. He can't/don't want to go full anti-globalist anti-cabal and Make Russia Great Again, and can't allow all that jewish crap spreading in Russia. We had it already, and it nearly put Russian elite to the verge of extermination in 1993 when only intervention of the West along with naivety of Russians not prepared for Western methods of propaganda in nearly destroyed Russia prevented Yeltsin and his clicue of jewish democratic thieves from persecution and jail.

8
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Depends on what is in file. I don't think it is unreplaceable originals of some shit of Western politics that have to be kept in hands to have value.

For example, it could be list of exact numbers of US documents with description Tucker could request by FOIA f.e. to find out the truth he is seeking (if he really do, of course).

As far as I understand it is impossible to get something through FOIA if you don't know what to request. And it is impossible to somehow search through available documents to find what you look for. But if you know what exact document to request, it is much simplier.

In this case there is no any problem to scan them and upload somehwere for further study, and don't have printed versions entering US. Leave only copies of Bogdan Khmelnitsky letters in file as being declared, and that's all.

I don't really know if there was something else, I just noticed that file looks thicker and heavier than it should be. Also, Putin is bureaucrat, paper worm, well-teached in secrecy things. If there was some hidden stuff for Carlson eyes only, that's how it could be done by ex-KGB man, right before the eyes of audience and stuff around to give a perfect cover for Tucker. So this conspiracy theory. :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was nothing that I didn't already knew about. However it could be a revelation for Western audience which know everyting about Russia from its worst enemies.

There was one interesting thing nobody seems noticed, but I'll make separate post about it.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suspected this half a year ago and everyone thought I was a "conspiracy theorist"

You are perfectly know that most "conspiracy theories" are just spoilers. :)

I want to 3D print pikes but cannot find a 3D printer large enough or a plastic material strong enough to support writhing 250lbs corpse.

You could do it. Kind of. In your 3D editor split your pikes in parts you could print. Glue them after printing in whole thing. Use this model to sand casting your pikes from whatever material you like. Works perfect for me for complex aluminium car parts. See no problems why it whould not work for you for steel. And you could cast as many pikes as you need for your fellows using that 3D printed model.

If you are advanced enough in engineering you could try to combine 3D printer with MIG welder.

Also, it is not a problem to build large 3D printer. It is even not expensive now. Problem will arise with speed of printing that will depend on diameter of extruder jet for FDM printers. Some enthusiasts even was able to print buildings from concrete.

Even with current level of 3D printing tech, I personally find 3D printing extremely useful even for domestic use. Saved me a tons of money and time, and often I was able to print a plastic spare part for broken plasic original that was better and solved problem with that part forever. Unlimited sharing of 3D models for common things among people also helps a lot. Printing NLA parts resolve the problem with programmed obsolescence by manufacturer. Sand casting metal parts using printed model also works perfectly, but I thinking about obtaining some written off x-ray scope to control quality of castings, few times I got cavities inside castings and had to cast and replace part again, thankfully model was already done so that was fast.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you're a wage earner, the business you work for is responsible for sending the taxes to the government every paycheck, so it is automatically deducted before you receive the check

This is how it is done in Russia. Employer pays all empoyees taxes and insurances, and if Russians talk about salary it is always about sum after all taxes and insurances paid. Normally, Russian employee don't need to bother with taxes at all.

It is also required to pay taxes on a lot of things, like private sales for cash, but no one reports cash transactions.

That's the difference. Here only really huge private sales have to be reported and only if they are too often. Say, you could sell an expensive car or a house, but you don't need to pay anything unless you do it more often than once a year or something like.

f you own a small business or make a lot of money on investments the government expects you to send in tax money every 3 months, based on your estimated earnings.

Thank you. Didn't know that. I thought that once a year all Americans have to recall all their earnings, calculate tax, fill some paper and send it along with money transfer to IRS. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. So, I just underestimated the richness of word "return". :)

As for "transferring ownership", from my knowledge of business, in Russian version, I still don't get how one business entity could "transfer ownership" to another business entity and it will not be accounted as sale. I understand than entity that received plane will be able to write offsomething from taxing and all that stuff. But then, entity that delivered plane will have to show income or whatever from that transfer and so pay taxes, and also lose its own ability to write off expenses on plane. I just can't get in head what's the point of such operation, especially between business entities wiith one owner. First, I assumed that "transfer ownership" means some operation additional to the "sale" and "gift". Something third that doesn't involve any taxable operations. It is interesting for me personally, because f.e. I can't just take a computer from one of my businesses and just move it to the account of another without making sale deal or gift deal, which both will lead to paying additional taxes. Even if actually I'm the only real owner of this computer and it doesn't change hands at all. If there is some third option to do it in US, then highly probably it exists in one way or another in Russia too, since our business laws heavily copied from Western one.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I call bullshit

The truth is that the government funded "scientists" today are pseudo-science government bureaucrat frauds who can't even get a man to the moon without faking it.

Agree. But not because of 3D printing. :)

As for 3D printing in general - there are two things to cosider.

First, it is already much cheaper for making things in small series. Creating mold for injection cost more than 3D printer itself.

Second - it is important branch of tech that have huge importance. Switching from carving things from something to creating things from the scratch by assembling them from perticles from scratch is a huge step in how we create things. Today we do it on relatively large scale using large perticles gluing them together, but next obvious step will be doing that on molecular level, and then on atomic level. So we are only two steps away from that SciFi replicators that could make you anything you need from what you have around, which will completely change all economy, and not in the interests of corporations.

Also you could notice some weirdness in 3D printing development. Modern 3D printers could be perfectly in use since early 70s, when first CNC machines was rolled out. There were all necessary components availabe. Really, affordable FDM 3D printer could be easily rolled out to the public along with first cheap personal computers like Sinclair ZX and Commodore 64. But that was delayed for two decades, and I think it was done intentionally with patents and IP laws. I personally did something similar to 3D printing already in late 80s when I make a CNC mill from old written off flatbed plotter, replacing pen head with mill, carving many hand-drawn layers of object I need from flat plywood or plastic and then glueing them together. Sinclair ZX clone was more than enough for that. So idea was pretty obvious and on the surface for a long time before, but was not used by industry.

Then, recall that first affordable 3D printer was made by enthusiasts (RepRap), not by some corporation. Only because RepRap was opensourced, official enterprises was forced to start production of mass-market 3D printers.

Also, as it happened, recall all that attempts to limit, license or prohibit 3D printing with using something like "they will print guns!!!!111" as reason,

Add to that attempts to forcefully copyright/license things files and other stuff to prevent free exchange of thing files between people. Fortunately all that crap eventually failed, however at the time I heard about few real cases against people who printed "copyrighted content" from games and movies.

Today, more accurate and closer to molecular 3D printing SLA printers are artificially delayed by enormous cost of UV curing resin. And interesting, that it is not resin itself that cost a lot. Resin itself is pretty cheap. It is UV sensitive initiators that are patented and declared as intellectual property that cost absolutely insane money per gram. There is some encouraging news from India chemical manufaturers who just stop care about all that patents and IP crap in the light of nowdays events and began to make affordable UV initiators, but volume is too small yet.

And so on. There are a lot of weird things around 3D prinitnng in general that show obvious resistance against that technology from corporations and TPTB.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea of a "tax return" in America is that the government expects everyone to overpay their taxes throughout the year, then file a tax return form to claim the amount that was overpaid. In this sense, the excess taxes are returned to the worker (without interest, of course!).

Thanks. So tax payments is two-stage process - first you pay full taxes, then fill that "tax return" and may be get something back. Got it.

And paying full taxes sounds like some continuous process through the year - you mean you should pay something by yourself to IRS every time you earn some money without filling papers?

I'm not sure how all of this relates to your questions about the plane.

It does not. Just curiosity about practical side of tax paying in US. :)

As for real intentions - looks like it is just a virtue signalling of kind. Funny, that regardless of how many planes you have you could not fly on more than one, so there will be no any difference in so called "carbon emissions" from your persona. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you, but I'm afraid things become more misterious for me. :)

So, every US citizen have to fill "tax return"...

Well, stupid intermediate semantic question - why the fuck "return"? Return of what to whom? Paying part of money you got from employer or customers to IRS is in no way a "return". Or it is assumed that all money is a property of system or sourced by system so you return part of money you got to system?

Sorry, back to question - US citizen have to fill "tax retrun" and show income and pay calculated percent of income. He could extempt some money from taxing showing some acquisitions. Showing he owns a plane with price $10M will save him only $1.2M (or whatever income tax is). How he could save more than price of plane in taxes? Show price of plane he "got in ownership" as $100M? And that persons who did "ownership transfer" did the magic of that "ownership transfer" to not pay taxes for selling or taxes for receiving gift, it that the trick?

Sorry if it is too stupid questions, but I can't get the point. :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does it mean "transferred ownership"? Is it some special American term? Is it somehow different from "sold" or "gifted"?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care about Tucker, really. He is interesting phenomenon, but I don't see any use or harm. Most likely he is just yet another senseless entertainment like SuperBowl or some Discovery channel documentary about sea life for the plebs.

But my point was not about him.

Being evil does not inherently mean being stupid.

Whoever persons you mentioned are, your screenshot clearly shows that this Hillary is just stupid.

"Tucker buying Russian outlet" does not differ from "Tucker making contract with Russian outlet" for her narrative. But she is plain stupid and ignorant and so make such irrelevant for her narrative, but interesting for classifying her mistake.

In no way such stupid person could be in charge. Even by nowdays bottom-low TPTB standards. So Hillary is 100% no more than a useful idiot for her masters.

So who exactly is Hillary boss?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

AFAIK Carlson have more than enough money to buy some Russian outlet. Even few of them. :)

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do not even subvert the peasants any more.

They switched to subverting "AI". :)

Why subvert the peasants when you could subvert "AI" and then always tell peasants that everything you do was "AI" decision?

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

the only thing i would add is the value of physical books

Exactly! I just forgot that today "everything is internet, no need for books!".

Textbooks on math, physics, chemistry, mechanics, biology, gardening and medicine is a minimum you must have around. Also good literature and history books will neve be excess.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›