Looks like this is a big rabbit hole most of you don't even suppose to exist. :) If you have questions (literally any, regardless all that PC crap or biases) - ask me. I'll try to be as unbiased as possible. May be you will find something interesting or/and important.

When digging in most conspiracies, you could notice that many of them somehow connected to the 70-s of XX century.

For example:

Since 70-s we have no any significant scientific discoveries. I mean really game-changing things. Last one was laser. It was real discovery of something simple but never seen before. Totally new thing, that change nearly everything. We see a lot of game-changing discoveries before 70-s, but none after. Just like progress was intentionally stopped. The only significant progress I could see is in the electronics. And it is just miniaturisation of pre 70-s stuff, not something really new. Even in USSR higly promising ternary computers was dropped exactly in 70-s. As somebody said, "we dreamed about flying cars in XXI century, but got only fucking 140 characters in twitter".

Space exploration. As soon as humanity get a technical ability to explore external worlds, (it does not matter, was moon landing a hoax or not, the important thing that it was technically possible) it was limited to habitable LEO stations, nothing more. In 70-s.

Climate. All that dumb thing with fighting climate change started in 70-s.

Firearms restrictions all over the world, prohibition of psychodelics, changing terrorism from "killing political opponents or high rank authorities" to that strange thing they sold us as "terrorism" now (did you notice that only beneficiars of "terrorism" is governments and never ones who blamed? So what is the point for blamed to repeat something completely useless for them again and again?), etc. All that starts in 70-s.

Just check, you will find connection of nearly every conspiracy to something in 70-s.

It's not only my fantasy. Others find that strange and suspicious too. Look at https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ or https://www.epi.org/publication/raising-americas-pay/ (just check the "Poverty rate, actual and simulated 1959–2012" graph. It shows that right after 70-s, each time poverty rate drops, it inevitably returns to exact value of 15%. This is definitely an intentional thing.)

So, the root and the key of most conspiracies is in something in 70-s. If we find what happened in 70-s and who is behind, we will get a key to nearly every conspiracy we talk about here.

Any suggestions or may be some more evidence?

Long story short. I'll try to compress all facts and logic to the few sentences.

The main thing they don't tell you about climate change and greenhouse effect is that the grow of mean temperature is not the only result of greenhouse. You also get huge reduction of temperature gradient between day and night, winter and summer and across the globe. We already have local greenhouses in tropic forests. The overall gradient is less than 10 Celsius. At the same lattitudes, where are no greenhouse you get ... deserts, with temperature gradients more than 60 degrees.

Overall, if you have -10C to +40C overall gradient, with mean temperature +15C, really you would not get -5C to +45C hell if mean temperature will rise for 5C. You probably will get something like +10C to +30C, that is definitely much better than current -10C to +40C.

Earth already had greenhouse climate in the past multiple times. Eocene, last one, is a good example. There was 1000-2000 ppm CO2. Planet was really green from pole to pole and had mild warm climate everywhere. Eocene is age when mammals developed. In the memory of that we keep temperature and humidity in our houses at values exactly equal to that of eocene. Check the paleontology studies, you will find a lot of interesting stuff, including temperature charts.

Warm greenhouse periods last much longer than ice ages. Every Ice age was unnatural for the Earth, and was a result of some catastrophic event. Extinctions happen only when ice ages began. Return to normal greenhouse climate always lead to evolution and life diversity on the planet. Sea levels was not high in eocene, say Antarctic continent had 25% more territory above sea level than now. They just forgot to tell you, that plants is 80-90% is water, so the water from melted ice will also go to the mass of endless forests and disappeared deserts, and not only for sea level rise. Sea level could be even lower than now, as many eocene studies show.

As the result of global warming we will get literally green planet, with moderate climate everywhere. No drinking water problems, less energy for heating and cooling, endless lands suitable for agriculture, no hunger, more flora and fauna diversity, we even will get rid of all that damned seasonal flus, because there will be no winter. How this could be bad? And for whom?

So, the question is - why all that ecologists fighting with climate change leaded by well known "philanthropists" want Earth stay half dead, like now? Why they try to stop the natural process of exit from ice age happened on Earth multiple times, that will give us endless new territories with pleasant climate where humans, animals and plants could live without constantly fighting with climate? Why that "warriors for the green Earth" spend all their efforts to prevent Earth from becoming literally green from pole to pole? Why they need us to survive on the half dead planet with very few comfort spots over planet?

Nice optimistic nurse want to make something good and important (as she thinks) at that fearful time. She got an opportunity to take a Pfizer vaccine on camera "to help people". So, she took that opportunity, but something definitely go wrong. When she regained consciousness, she was violently pressured to say some bullshit like "I constanly faint every day, it's not vaccine fault" by Pfizer marketologists, and finally she got, that she is completely fucked and will be threatened by corporation to take all the fault for vaccine result.

Just like in ordinal blockbuster movie where some ordinary person occasionally cross some big business road.

So, as soon as they leave her alone, Tiffany do what ordinary person from blockbuster usually do in movies - alerted family and friends to not to give her out to anybody, get rid of the phone, and went on a run.

We all like movies, and I think if we meet with some extraordinary circumstances previously seen only in movies, we have only movie pattern to act as an example.

This theory explain everything (social, weird hospital messages and videos with double, silence from family, etc.) much better than theory that Tiffany is dead. I think there is no any problem for insanely rich corporation to disguise a death as some car accident or something else, definitely not connected to the vaccine.

Can't keep myself from another movie/series parallel: May be, some day, some resistance group hiding from medical tyranny will get a door bell with a girl on the threshold. "I'm Tiffany Dover, come with me, if you want to live!" :)