12
26
18

I'm not quite understand western rage about gas prices.

OK, gas become more expensive, shit happens. But what is the problem to ask employer to rise your salary? It's not your imagination, employer perfectly know that gas price rised. You have skills, you sell them to employer who need your skills, it is a trade and there is capitalism around. Gas prices changed, so your skills become more expensive too, since you need gas to continue to sell your skills to employer.

Another question is about salaries. In many private talks with westerners, when things come to salaries, people refuse to name the numbers. IDK, in Russia we don't have any taboos about salaries, and it is common topic for talks, when people compare their salaries, bragging about recent rise or complaining about decline. With exact numbers. "I have 150kRUB/month. Wow, I work less than you and have 170kRUB/month. My business bring me 100-200kRUB/month. I work half-day and have 70kRUB/month. You all too rich in that city, I have only 80kRUB/month in my shithole". (we used to monthly salary numbers, as tradition) I never had heard that kind of talks on western forums or in private communication. Even talking with drunk western friends in bar it is impossible to talk about each other salaries/profits. What is it? Salaries is something intimate on the west and it is indecently to discuss them?

About that post: https://conspiracies.win/p/15IXpITedE/was-looking-at-an-oil-price-hist/

User funturistic found a similarities in some prices graphs and had a reasonable question about it.

So, what the hell is going on? If you are an engineer with open mind you already know the answer. For others, I'll try to explain it as easy as possible.

I thought a little and find simple parallel/analogy from engineering world, very obvious and simple. You will get it easily.

Just imagine you have a noisy audio amplifier. You want to find a source of noise and fix it. You measure voltages inside amplifier circuit against shield/ground/case and everywhere you see the same noise. Say, you have an amplifier power supply with -15, 0 and +15 Volts outputs. Against shield/ground, every output show that noise. But when you measure voltages between 0V and -15V or 0V and +15V or -15V and +15V there is no any noise at all. Outputs are clean and stable. So, it is obvious, that the source of noise is unhinged shielding/ground wire, not amplifier itself. As soon as you tightly tie shielding/ground wire to, say, 0V of power supply, noise will immidiately disappear and you will see clean and sensible signal on the input and output of amplifier.

Another parallel, even more simple:

Imagine that you want to study changes of water level in the lake. But to measure it you select a board of boat full of jumping clowns as reference point instead of lake shore or bottom. You measure water level with your wrong reference and find out a lot of noise. Clowns are jumping in the boat and the boat is heavily pitching. You measure distnace from boat board to bottom and shore and see the same noise. Does that measurements have any sense in lake studying? Absolutely not. You choose wrong reference point, and measuring not the changes of lake water level, but exclusively the activity of clowns in the boat.

And here is exactly the same thing with gold, oil, bitcoin, whatever. You observe only the noise in ground wire, fucking clowns twerking in boat, and that noise/twerking is same for anything you try to check or measure. So, you just select wrong, unconnected reference point to study values. Source of that noise/twerking is not oil, gold, crypto, whatever themselves, but clearly the USD itself.

Unless you select correct, stable reference point or thorougly tie currency to some decent reference value, there is no any sense to analyse your circuit or measure lake water level by that noisy shit.

I understand that it could be hard to accept that fiat currency (USD) is not an universal common measure for the value of commodities, and in no way could be used to do any conclusions about economy. It is especially hard to accept if you indoctrinated with that bullshit named "economy science", but for any sane engineer it is just an obvious fact. USD (and any other fiat currency) is an unhinged source of noise in the system. And highly probably, it is unhinged purposedly to allow noise, and noise is completely artificial and intended. That noise allows extraction of wealth from the society by real USD owners.

You can't study economy processes in society using such reference point. And you absolutely can't make any sensible conclusion about economy using that thing. Looking on the prices of commodities in fiat currency you could only observe fucking clowns twerking in the boat, nothing else.

Any "economist" who use "price in USD" for making any research or conclusion about the state of economy is just a charlatan or one of that clowns twerking in the boat. And deserves nothing but the punch in the lying face from any sane human being.

Capitalism in its western form have some restrictions. Some ways of making profit accounted as crime.

  • Killing competitor is a crime.
  • Theft is a crime.
  • Patent infringement is a crime.
  • Insider trading is a crime. And so on.

So, capitalism could have restrictions.

What if there could be another capitalism, with another, slightly different set of restrictions?

Say,

  • Killing competitor is a crime.
  • Theft is a crime.
  • Usury is a crime.
  • Profiteering (all that stock games) is a crime.
  • Intentional limiting of customer in a bought product usage (all that "planned obsolescence", "usage licenses" and "authorized service only") is a crime. with keeping all other freedoms of private business you could find in western capitalism.

Will it still be a capitalism? Do capitalism you defend should have usury and profiteering as essential part of it?

Just asking for a friend who think that western type of capitalism is doomed and sooner or later will be completely demolished by insane elites. So we will have to build new type of capitalism, that have no vulnerabilites that allow creation and existence of elites. :)

What rules and restrictions such capitalism should have to avoid a core possibility of elite formation?

Take in mind, that under "elite" I mean parasitic bastards, like current ones, not a meritocratic elite, like best engineers or best business organizers.

21

Of course you all are perfectly familiar with insane obsession of elites with that "climate change", and especially CO2 "pollution".

Let's assume that elites are somehow differ form human race for whatever reason. For simplicity let's call them reptiloids as it is de-facto settled term to describe them.

Let's take in account, that CO2 have few peaks in absorption spectra in all InfraRed (IR) regions. There is near IR and far IR regions. Near IR (NIR) is just a red light, that is too red to be sensed by humans as visible light. Unlike Far IR (FIR), it does not represent radiation of heated bodies (at least heated to normal ambient temperature range, not thousands of degrees), so have no any significant interference with termal balance of our planet. NIR is what your IR remote control blink into TV or other device. It is not heat, it is just a light we do not see. However, camera in the phone could easily "see" NIR flashes of IR remote control unlike FIR.

So, they use FIR absorption of CO2 as a reason of "awful climate change". It is a complete lie, of course, greenhouse climate is not a problem, it is a solution.

As you of course understand, the optimal concentration of CO2 (1200ppm, 3 times more than we have now ), will effectively not only keep and guide the energy of the Sun as FIR to the higher latitudes, but also will reduce NIR light from the Sun reaching the Earth surface.

And here is critical part of theory - NIR light is vitally necessary to keep reptiloids intelligent.

Without decent amount of NIR lighting during day, they are just dumb animals with intellect of chicken. Less NIR lighting, dumber reptiloids. So, it is not FIR CO2 absorption they really care about, but NIR we don't see or feel by our senses. That is their "another dimention" or "supernatural property". They just highly sensitive to the part of spectra we are not care about at all.

So, all that mess is just because CO2 level in atmosphere become slightly higher (or it is a Solar Minimun reduce NIR in sunlight, if you wish) making elites dumbier than 6 years old. They know it and in an enormous hurry trying to, at least, reduce CO2 level in atmosphere, to get more NIR lighting around. As they are failed or too late to prevent NIR shortage, they become dumber and some time ago they become so dumb, that now nearly all their actions do more harm for their agenda than making some use. Since they are dumb and at the same time still own an enormous power, they grabed when was smarter, their stupidity do enormous harm to the humanity.

What to do: Produce more CO2. Fuck carbon footprint. Use open fire and "unsustainable" (as of Agenda 2030), i.e. non-green, tech with highest possible carbon footprint. Go, and make a tasty barbeque on the wood or charcoal right now. Use wood and coal to heat your house. And so on.

This theory gives answers to following questions:

  • Why they are so absessed with CO2 concentration
  • Why they looked wise and intelligent in the past and looks like imbeciles now
  • What could we do to defeat them

New question this theory rises:

  • How exactly NIR is consumed or used by elites?
  • Could we use NIR filters or sources (LEDs, f.e.) to manipulate them?

PS: Additional interesting fact: Incandenced bulbs have much more NIR in radiation than modern LED lamps used everywhere now, even in their homes and HQs. And nearly total replacement of incandenced bulbs to the LED bulbs perfectly coincide with drastic fall of elites intelligence. Especially funny that this happened with noticeable help of their own narrative about "green" shit. Some country leaders even prohibited use and production of incendenced bulbs. That lowered NIR irradiation of environment even more with all consequences.

13

One of the corner-stone of modern "democracy" is a declared necessity of elections necessary for authority rotation.

But literally none of "democtrats" ever talk about rotation of higher level authorities, like IMF, WEF, WHO and other persons and institutions that represent higher levels of authorities than country leaders.

According to the logic of "democrats" if you must have a right to elect a local sheriff or mayor, with many order of magnitude you must have a right not only select all that global institutions, but also must have a right to vote for changing state regime, political system and other things that is much more important than some prime ministers or presidents.

If "democrats" do not even allow a thought about electing bosses of local bosses, than their idea of "democracy" is just a hoax.

Obviously there is no any sense to choose from puppets of one master, regardless of if master is some person or some institution.

Until "democrats" began to talk about direct elections and rotation of UN, IMF, WEF, WHO and other global institutions, there are no any sense to take their propaganda seriously at all.

PS: That is not about validity of elections procedure itself, we all know that they could be easily rigged, it is about giant and obvious hole in logic of "democracy" propaganda.

PPS: It is also about worldwide "democrats", not just US Democratic Party alone.

20

Heard funny theory:

There are a lot of talks among western politicians about urgent need for exporting Ukrainian grain. That grain is specifically intended to feed African people.

So there is reasonable questions - why that grain is so important, why hurry, why not transport it over railways, why it should be transported on the ship, why West have such strange intention to take care of afrikans, and so on.

So the theory that easily answer to all that questions:

This is a special, weaponised GMO grain, raised in Ukraine because it is illegal to grow such things anywhere else. Africa is a target.

That is why they could not transport it by trucks or trains, it could fall into wrong hands, that is why they are in a hurry, if Russia occupy last Ukrainian port, that weaponized GMO grain will stuck in Ukraine, that is why this grain is for Africa, that is historically used as testground for worst biologial and medical experiments by elites.

Final assumption is that the thing that was added to that Ukrainian GMO grain is that fucking "spike protein", they desperately tried to distribute using virus, not-a-vaccines, pills, and now they urgently need to save and test "spike protein" in food.

Enjoy. :)

I personally don't take that theory seriously. Yet. But looks good and logical. There is definitely something in it. :)

Really that is not very complex.

For over 30 years elites work hard to involve Russia into globalist agenda. Kissinger was in the game deeply, more than everybody could imagine. He invested a lot of work into that thing. Unlike failed with his stupid "opposition" and "woke" moves Soros, who participated in that work too, Kissinger didn't make jerky moves. Slowly destroying Russian industry, pushing hard dependece on western tech, all that western economics shit, green light for "Russian" oligarchs in the West and so on. He find some keys to sucking Russia into globalist agenda and make a huge success. And now, new, young woke globohomos literally destroying his enormous 30 year work with stupid sanctions and narrative. Every week of sanctions destroys years of Kissinger work.

That is why he made his statement. In the long run, it is more profitable for elites to restore relations with Russia at any cost and bind it to agenda back, than get some temporary success with their rush to famine/shortages stuff, but lose Russia completely.

It is clear for Kissinger that even dumb sheeple will began to ask an unpleasant questions about why that bad Russia have enough food and fuel for all its orcs, when elites talk about "global shortages" for them, nice, obedient and woke sheeple. It is not global, if it is only West suffering. And that sheeple will not give a fuck to that poor Ukraine, most of them become aware of just at Feb 23, when it comes to daily food and fuel.

Kissinger plan was much better in long run - destroy or gain NWO control over Russian industry, involving Russia into carbon tax hoax and other stuff, and finally make shortages really global, in Russia too. Slow, but reliable.

So, that is not Kissinger on Russia side. It is Kissinger protecting NWO agenda that is ruining apart with the hands of woke, impatient and stupid Young Global Leaders who literally pushing Russia out of NWO highway.

17

It's just a theory, but I liked that simplicity.

New world currency will not be some central bank crypto replacement of fiat money, it will be carbon footprint units.

Price of everything will be nominated in carbon footprint units.

Each citizen will be given (monthly?) a fixed amount of that carbon footprint points he could spend on goods and services.

So, UBI, paid by authorities in carbon footprint units CBDC will effectively control citizens in the name of climatehoax with all shitty consequences.

Just like that.

15

If you remember, some time ago there was a huge hype on the West about the Putins rival Alexey Navalny.

Shortly, Navalny plan was to defeat Putin by striking his wallets AKA "Russian" oligarchs assets on the West. Navalny collected a lot of proofs that nearly all "Russian" oligarchs assets on the West was bought using criminal money. As far as I understand, Navalny had some agreement with West, that he will collect proofs and West will arrest/confiscate "Russian" oligarchs property, weakening Putin and Co. and seeding unrest among Putins oligarchs against him. Navalny collected all necessary proofs (may be with some help of MI6/Bellingcat) risking with his life, and even was poisoned by FSB. West did nothing. Navalny even sacrificed himself, returned to Russia and obviously went to jail, may be in attempt to force West to fullfill its part of deal.

But West just betrayed Navalny and did absolutely nothing against "Russian" oligarchs.

Navalny, may be was the only possible way to displace Putin in Russia. Most people in Russia support the idea of oligarchs wealth confiscation/arrest a lot. Navalny dramatically lose that support by pushing coronahoax narrative even more than Russian Federation authorities, but still had chances to fuck the coronahoax narrative and gain popularity again. He already did things that was not welcomed by West, like openly talking about unprecedented censorship in Twitter after Trump ban.

However, West gifted all that powerful lever of arresting "Russian" oligarchs Western assets directly to the Putin. Now Russian propaganda sometime use that thing as "Putin do what Navalny promised to do, but completely failed. It was Putin, not Navalny, who stripped oligarchs from their western wealth stolen from Russians".

Navalny opposition does not exist now and there is zero chance for his supporters to gain any influence or support from people again. They had tens millions of supporters back then and now have only few thousands crying about Russian invasion and enormous amount of hidden COVID cases in Russia from abroad.

Just to clarify things about "Russian" oligarchs and their wealth and assets. Everything that bastards have, they literally stole from Russian people. In no way that bastards could be accounted as businessmans. Every single "Russian" oligarch is a thief and criminal, all their wealth and assets should be confiscated (regardless of officialy declared oligarch relative/friend as owner) and all of them should be in jail. This might be the only thing all Russians agree on, independent of their political views.

Rise of Putin's rating in Russia is fuelled mostly by that Western "sanctions" against most disgusting thieves like Abramovich, Usmanov, Potanin and others, not by that questionable war. Propaganda quickly repainted that as achievement of Putin. And it is even partially true - that bastards lost their ability to hide their stolen wealth on the West.

So, interesting question - why the West completely betrayed Navalny and why West gave the most powerful lever of influence over Russians it promised for Navalny directly to Putin? West simply allowed Putin to completely defeat most probable real opposition-to-be and then do for the Putin everything that they promised to do in support of that potential opposition? Was that just elites stupidity, or the intentional elites plan to provide maximum support for Putin in Russia? Or elites thought that Navalny, looking for population support could eventually become a threat for them, unlike Putin?

There are theories that current financial system based on usury periodically needs war or other severe crisises to dump excess money usury created.

So, creating a war, elites get rid of money to start another cycle of milking population through usury.

But there definitely exists much more soft ways of getting rid of excess money. For example - space. It is infinite. You could throw infinite amount of money into it without killing a lot of humans and without sending much more into misery. Build spaceships, send them to another planets, buld space stations, moon bases and other stuff. It will be even very useful, even just because many new technologies will be soak back to regular life. And it will look much more pleasant for population than doing same by building tanks, ships and planes and then destroying them in wars.

So why elites don't want to resolve the basic defects of their stupid ususry milking system by peaceful and much less harmful way?

Elites just like to kill people.

10

Just as open-mind assumption

  • "social media" was established as a replacement of MSM. I think that NWO felt that MSM will lose it's influence on public, so they need a replacement. Also, they want a better mean of surveillance. So, "project LifeLog" choose than shitty Zuck who was ready to do any disgusting shit for money and help him to build and promote Facebook. The same was done with all "popular" "social media". They even name it "media", like the "mass media" they have to replace

  • There are way less real users of all that Facebooks, Twitters, WhatsApps and other Instagrams than declared. Some real user registers in a "social media". He wish to find some "friends" to talk and read. If it is uncontrolled, he could find real people and that group, talking about their lives and comparing their expirience could eventually come to the very unwanted conclusions.

  • So, to prevent that, for each real user they have dozens of fake accounts who will pose as ordinary people but push the narrative NWO wants. Also, that fake accounts "show example" of sharing personal data for those who fall in that trap.

  • That mechanism rarely was used for something political, initially it was used (or even developed for that purpose) for marketing and advertising. That is how your "social media" feeds instantly began to discuss some new gadget or some other product. That is how that "social media" get an excuse for enormous income they show.

  • I think first political usage of that mechanism was pushing of LGBTXYZ+ agenda decade ago. Fist ultimate heavy use of that shitty "social media" mechanism was coronahoax. You all perfectly remember all that lies from your "social media friends" about "uncle of friend of friend of my friend who don't believe in coronavirus died from it wispering this is not happening". Here we have tons of posts with the proofs of that narrative injections with that "keyphrases" they forgot to change from target to target.

So, all that "social media" really have way less real people surrounded by artificial accounts pushing narratives instead of MSM. It is not even "social", it is a traps for people where they immidiately surrounded by dosens of propagranda and advertising accounts who feed the victim by their crap.

And now I see exactly the same behavour of that international propaganda network.

Let's make an experiment to prove that theory.

Few days ago in Russian segment of "social media" appeared few very distinct "real stories" from "friend of friend of friend" as usual.

  • Tales about awful Russia crimes in Bucha (and only in Bucha despite the dozens of similar small towns and villages was given back to Ukraine) from the mouths of "witnesses friend of friend of friend". Keywords - "movable crematoriums" and "body bags". (interesting, that this movable crematoriums and body bags and new Russian state standard was discussed in the rise of vaccination campaign but all that talks was heavily suppressed by "social media". Seems now they found a "correct" use for that things :) ).

  • Stories about people in something close to military uniform who sending home washing machines and TV's in the offices of logistic companies in Russian towns close to Ukrainian borders. Also told by "social media" friends. Keywors "logistic company, friend who work on reception"

It is spreading in Russian segment really fast, by different accounts in different groups and forums who tell the same story about "friend of friend send a private post/video/whatever".

Interesting, do you already observe the same message flow in western "social media", and if not, how fast it will appear on your side.

PS: For stupid shills - that is not about the content of messages itself, it is about whole princiles of work and real purpose of "social media"

21
19

The answer is very simple.

Women have strong maternal instinct. Even if woman don't have children, she still have that strong and basic instinct. And the first thing that instinct tell the woman is "do everything for safety, your and your (potential) child".

So, if half of top managers are woman, it is extremely easy to manipulate them using this basic instinct that force any woman to look for safety. So, just say that narrative you push is for safety, and women will support it instinctively.

Yes, some women have enough brains to see manipulation, think independently and have free will to override instincts. But that kind of woman is most hated by all possible colours of feminists and and in no case will be invited to take one of that "diversity" vacancies.

That simple. Put women in charge, and they will do anything you want for the imaginary "safety" you tell them about. It was clearly visible during coronahoax.

13

Even at highest level of hysteria no propaganda machine will use anything that could discredit few things:

  • Authorities of enemy as a system. Propaganda could tell that it is a bad dictator/president/leader/whatever, but never will say anything that could seed a distrust of enemy population to the institute of authority itself.
  • MSM of enemy. Propaganda could tell that they lie, cheat, spread disinformation, whatever, but never will say something that could ruin the whole concept of MSM in enemy country
  • Banking system of enemy. Again, propaganda will never discredit banking system in the eyes of enemy population
  • Laws of enemy. Propaganda will never call enemy population to ignore their laws.
  • Voting system. Propaganda could tell that there was voting fraud, but will never try to convince enemy population that voting is a complete hoax from the beginning.

Interesting, that most powerful things propaganda could use against enemy never really used.

That "Ukrainian Nazis" narrative is a lie too.

Yes, Ukrainian nazis exists (existed?) and they definitely not in great love with Russians and Polish people. But in the first place their main enemy is Jews. They even agreed to make an alliances with Russians and Polish to resist Jewish invasion and power seizure in Ukraine. There was even some kind of agreement between Russian and Ukrainian nationalists about mutual sanctuary, and there was cases when it perfectly worked. Russian and Ukraininan nationalists cooperated in the fight against muslims invasion too. In the past they participated in different Slavic Nationalist Union meetings and had no any problems with coexistence with Polish and Russians nationalists. AFAIK all questions among Slavic nations was set on hold by most nationalistic movements due to the growing and obvious threat of NWO and muslims invasion in Europe. That was up to the events of 2014.

Take a look, f.e. - https://last24.info/read/2014/11/20/3/4863 (in Russian, use online translator Google translate f.e.). Don't forget that it is still a propaganda, but the cooperation between Russain and Ukrainian nationalists was a real thing and that could be still true, taking in account that after 2014 Jewish power seizure MSM began to show some other Ukrainian nazis nobody know about.

Russian nationalists even got offers from FSB and Russian Federation state officials to head LPR/DPR but denied, because don't account Ukraininans as enemies. Check Dmitry Demushkin case, f.e. https://khpg.org/en/1608809502 (in English)

There is possibility that real Ukrainian nationalists go underground after 2014 power shift to avoid extermination by Jewish government and some jewish shills took their place to explicitly force Ukraininan-Russian tensions in the country.

Now we see some strange "nazis" who are on the side of Jews and NWO with never known leaders and complete absence of any nationalistic ideology. That is not Ukrainian nazis at all, it is some NWO military units.

Hardly that things will be heard even here, and hardly they are important, but that is just another proof that all that Russian-Ukrainian tensions are completely staged and nearly everything is a lie, even in such small details.

11
19

SWIFT shutdown - just longer and more expensive transfers, for Russians that is not a problem, because most time still lost not at transaction itself, but at Russian finance control.

Closed sky - losses for West much larger than losses for Russian ATC. Passengers will pay for longer flights.

Leased planes return - owners will lost a lot of money, they already have a lot of unused planes due to coronahoax restrictions, and will get more. And even just keeping big passenger plane is not a cheap thing at all - hangars, inspections, etc. That losses will be compensated from Western passengers pockets.

Fuel - huge price rise in West, for the pleasure of overpriced "green" shit manufacturers and sellers.

Personal sanctions - again complete, absolute bullshit, as usual. To sanction Russian bureaucrat or oligarch you have to sanction all his relatives, friends and subordinates. It is useless to sanction bureaucrat or oligarch itself, because since the beginning all his personal western assets are written to relatives, friends and subordinates.

And so on. All that does not look like anything that could even potentially harm Puting & Co who are presumed "bad guys". Real target - Western population, and ordinary Russians, a little. We are already adapted for all that West sanctions and Putin's counter-sanctions, that really harm only low and middle class Russians, and did it long time ago. But what about Western people?

10

This theory explains nearly everything we know about that sham "Russian - Ukrainian tensions". Population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarussia have enormous amount of family connections, and always had. It's like West Germany and East Germany, f.e. So there was one nation with different states. Overall trend is to centralize every nation under single TPTB government that is "native" to population. China with HongKong/Taiwan, Germany, Vietnam. Should look at Korea, I think they will try to unite it. That could be necessary for better control of population. When there are two states for one nation, there always could be a threat that one state will came out from TPTB control, with full support of other state population due to very close ties of population.

Everything we know about "Russian-Ukrainian tensions" perfectly fits to that theory. From complete absence of real West help for Ukraine (hope you don't think that including LGBTQXYZ+ narrative into Ukrainian schools is real western help) to permanent creating a fictional conflict, from dropping Russian language in Ukraine up to insolent gifting of Crimea to Putin. And that Belarus which is a dirty spot on nice coronahoax narrative. And untoucheable west property of Putin & Co relatives that is by definition criminal and obtained by stealing wealth from Russians. Close relationships with Klaus Schwab make miracles. And all western countries offer easy and unconditional permanent residence and citizenship only for the Russian elite, and never for normal Russian people to avoid nation separation. Looks like all the time West thoroughly tried to keep normal Russians, Belorussians and Ukrainians in their borders at any cost. Now TPTB go to the next stage - joining up of that confinements.

Next will be China taking HongKong and Taiwan. Then, may be Korea.

What do you think about US and Canada?

19

Basic assumption: Elites are parsites. Proof: They absolutely can't exist without their host - people. From the other side, human being could perfectly exist without them. Unlike symbiotes, parasites don't provide any profit for host. Elites does not provide anything useful, only do harm to the people. So, elites are parasites per se. This gives us a stone solid basic point and a lot of clues.

Parasites are dumb, they don't need to develop any complex consciousness to feed from the host. Parasites need nutrition from the host. Parasites have some mechanism to replicate in hosts. Parasites use hosts as protection. And so on. You see? A lot of new things to study and look for vulnerabilities.

It could be very hard to kill a parasite without killing a host. Usually this achieved using antiparasitic drugs. (there exist other ways of killing parasites, but let's leave them for another round) Yep, we just need some kind of ivermectin for elites. (Isn't that the unconcious reason they so hate that ivermectin?)

Antiparasitic drugs works either by directly intrfering with parasite vital organs, or by depriving parasite from food. (If you know other princilpes - share it with class).

To choose antiparasitic drug we have to determine parasite vital organs and their nutrition. This will allow us to choose most effective vector of attack for out antiparasitic drug.

What could be elite food necessary for their existence?

Of course it is real food provided by people, we could try to find highly elite-specific food to poison it without harm for host.

It could be wealth too. Not only physical wealth, but also wealth in form of credibility among hosts, trust from other parasites, etc.

Also it could be host compliance, submission, obedience, whatever, you got it.

What could be elites vital organs?

Obviously MSM, bank system, governments, entertainment industry, NGOs, all that stuff. Elites could not survive without that organs.

How they replicate, what is their eggs or larvas and how they get into hosts?

Seems that it is MSM, education system and all around that seeds parasites eggs into hosts. Need to take a closer look to that stuff strictly from the point of parasite reproduction.

And so on.

If we really want to finally get rid of parasites, we inevitable had to find a decent vector or vectors of attack. To find it, we have to focus on the things that are common for all that parasites and don't take in mind some individual for separate parasite things. There is little sense of getting rid of single helminth.

We have to get rid of parasites. Parasites are dumb, if you do not fight them, they always kill the host, even if it will result in parasite own death.

There are no parasites humans could not beat after coldminded pure scientific take. That parasites named "elites" are no different, we just never take them as who they really are, that is the problem. We spent too many time discussing which parasite specimen is worse or what that specimen did. May be it is time to drop all that shit and began to solve the problem in whole?

Let's begin our scientific study. Let's set up our experiments. Let's touch and disturb different parts of parasites, observe reaction, find regularities, weaknesses, connections, etc. #BurnTheBrige is nice such experiment - MSM disturbed, parasite began to budge, it's definitely worth attention - how it budge, what is the ties between parts of it, etc. It is important not only to just try burn that bridge, I think it is much more inportant to track the results of that probe impact.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›