That's the most retarded thing I've read since the last time someone linked to the qtard asylum. Im assuming he means the 25th amendment, since there's only seven articles in the constitution. And of course it doesn't say what he claims, both houses of Congress have to confirm the candidate the president nominates before they become vp.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

But it's got what plants crave.

DEI isn't just a distraction, it's an attack. They maliciously put the incompetent into positions where they will naturally cause damage.

That and several shots were fired. The one caught on film isn't necessarily the one that hit him.

Obviously.

The servants identity themselves by visiting the remains of an old Roman fort that everyone pretends is a wall from the 2nd temple. The servants claim to be Christian, and ignore the fact that Christ predicted not two stones of the temple complex would be left atop one another.

Masons like doing their hidden hand thing too.

\o

It's more likely they intended to kill him and failed. A single gust of wind could easily turn an attempt to wound fatal at that range, so a false assassination wouldn't actually aim at the guy who's popularity they're trying to boost, he would have just fired into the crowd or at someone else on the stage. And they definitely wouldn't intentionally hit him somewhere one inch away from death if they didn't want him dead.

No, I suspect the goal was to either make a martyr, kick off a civil war, or simply replace him on the ballot.

Yeah, you're definitely sealioning. I doubt you're retarded enough to repeatedly obsess over an irrelevant detail like that otherwise, so fuck off and stop wasting my time.

Are you being intentionally obtuse to waste my time like a sealion? I literally just told you that's irrelevant. The meaning behind the action is the same regardless.

Nice example of "seeing, but see not" right there. It's irrelevant if the described action was literal or metaphorical, the important part is the lesson in the action.

Whoosh. I'll try explaining again. The action taken held a lesson in it, like how a parable does.

"Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand." In this case it was an action serving as a parable. There's a lesson about fruitfulness and the importance thereof in that event, but you're missing it.

This particular group has been around since Charlottesville, when they split off from an older group. Why didn't they, or their parent group, take action during any previous elections?

Why haven't these "feds" done a domestic terrorism yet? Literally all they do is march around, protest against child groomers, and hand out fliers.

Nein, ze problem has grown too large. We need ze flammenwerferpanzerkampfwagen.

Personally, I downvoted you for typing like a retarded chimp in the headline.

I assume he meant results like old google, without the current big tech censorship.

Homosex is also morally wrong. A twisted perversion that effectively rapes nature itself. Checkmate, heathen.

we are committed not to discriminate against any form of gender identity or sexual orientation

Not even against pedophiles, zoophiles, or necrophiles?

Its darkest before the dawn.

People who say that have clearly never been up and about early enough to see the hour or so before dawn for themselves.

Since when do they try defusing unexploded ordinance? I thought standard procedure was to evacuate everyone, maybe carefully move it somewhere more remote, then blow it up in a controlled manner?

You would have to be a retard or oblivious to your surroundings to think the insanely complex creation that you interact with every day just randomly happened without a creator.

Those of us who remembered Charlottesville were giving that same warning on other forums. The trick worked for them once, so of course they were going to do it again.