All I am trying to say is that if it gets to the point we are in a firefight, we are in serious trouble and it is probably the worst possible outcome. The point is to avoid kinetic warfare.
If the above fails then drones dropping bombs on our enemies would be my preferred method. To shoot at someone I have to expose myself and I think I would prefer to hide in a bunker and kill my opponents from there. It is now a battle proven technique.
You are certainly correct to an extent, but what I am saying is that if we are part of an organized community we will be prepared for whatever happens. Obviously this means leaving Blue cites now.
I'll give you an example from my own family, they are farmers in Idaho. I talked to my Grandfather often about what it was like during the Great Depression, the world wars, etc. The bottom line was that there was no disruption of their lives, except that they had two Japanese prisoners for labor, who stayed after the war was over. . .
I fully expect the next collapse to be similar. All the 'action' is going to take place in the Affected Blue Zones. Self sufficient Red Zone areas will likely prosper.
All it takes to prep for the collapse is to have a skill that is in demand, there is no need to stockpile gold, guns, or food (other than a week or so worth) just stay connected with the community.. Our power is in our connections, what we give and what we provide
The Blue communities may burn themselves out, so just avoid them. Be a valued member of your group or community and leave the Rambo stuff to the stupid people.
A final note. I favor a12 gauge pump shotgun with a foldable stock. If there is going to be any fighting it is likely to be in close, where an AR isn't as effective. Just my two cents.
Realistically a gun should be towards the bottom of the list when civilization falls. Anyone involved in a firefight has already lost, win or lose that particular battle. Just like a UFC fight, both combatants get hurt, it can't be avoided. It is better not to get involved in the fight.
The key is to create a community, an organized community can be extremely powerful. If the Community is large enough and powerful enough even the fall of civilization won't effect it.
Now is the perfect time to create a community and we can even do it on this forum, it doesn't have to be in a particular location. The world is in transition, cities are collapsing, people are separating and waking up. We can change the world right now.
They are correct that the creation of Israel was a NAZI operation prior to WW2.. Real Jews refuse to return to Israel because they believe God dispersed them and they would be working against God by returning.
Zionists are Khazarians.
Technically the points are correct, it is the approach that is wrong.
The best approach is to avoid any interaction with law enforcement and be as uninteresting as possible, be a grey rock. Any interaction is fraught with peril.
Failing that, make the interaction not worth official involvement, like homeless drug addicts or illegals.
Separation should be the goal.
You believe that the Sun, Moon and Stars are illusions. If you don't believe that then please tell me their distance and velocity in regards to the Earth.
The reason I keep asking these easy questions is because your Flat Earth idiocy can't answer those question and stay consistent with observations. Your position is indefensible which is why you don't even try to defend it and simply deflect and attack anyone who isn't as deluded as you are.
At 4:02:00 the narrator claims the Moon is a reflection of the Earth on the dome, distortion and optical illusion.
So again I ask, what is the distance and velocity of the Moon, the Sun and the Stars above the earth? Are they all the same on the Dome?
It isn't just Iran and the Hezbollah, it is Turkey, Syria, and possibly Egypt, Jordan, China and Russia. They will all support Iran if it is attacked.
If Israel has nukes they are a liability, because Russia and China will use theirs first against Israel at the first hint of Israel using nukes ( if nukes are real).
Israel lost their last war with Hezbollah and they are afraid of a pyrrhic victory over Gaza and committing genocide.
I know what nukes are, they aren't an effective weapon. . . A hypersonic guided missile is a much better weapon.
What do you mean "Israel won't get hit"? I know they have the Iron dome and laser defenses, but those systems can be overwhelmed. The Nuke threat is no longer a deterrent because too many people know the truth about them now.
Both the US and Israeli's militaries are somewhat archaic, current warfare is drones and missiles, not tanks and planes. Yes the US has good ISR capabilities, but that won't protect our ships from hypersonic missiles and our opponents generally don't have any high value targets to hit.
Insane is the right word.
Nukes aren't real in the sense that they have tremendous explosive power, they don't. What they do is create heat, millions of degrees at the center of the explosion and after 50 meters the temperature is the same as conventional explosives. What they don't do very effectively is produce pressure thermobaric bombs do that much better than nukes. Also precision guided munitions have eliminated the need for large area explosions.
The real problem in Israel is that Israel will probably lose if they try to invade Gaza, just like they lost when they invaded Lebanon. If they just stand off and bombard Gaza, they will lose in the eyes of the world.
What is the saying? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
A nuclear reaction generates a lot of heat and radiation, but very little pressure directly. Unless a nuke is detonated under water, where its heat vaporizes the surrounding water, it is not an effective weapon.
Essentially the threat of using nukes is a gentleman's agreement to control the world.