The force generated from the 100.000 ton tower falling is greater than the resistance from the floors below. As the tower is falling, energy is generated. It gains momentum as long as it keeps moving downward. Even though it loses some energy hitting the floor below it, by such a heavy object falling it regains that energy, plus some extra energy, and hits the next floor even harder than it did the floor above it.
If you remove the top 30 floors from the twin towers, where it now has 80 floors, and drop an 100.000 ton anvil on top of the tower, floor 80 will be crushed, as it is not designed to withstand an 100.000 object falling on top of it. No part of the building was designed to have a 100.000 ton object, that be the top 30 floor of the tower, drop on top of it, which is what happened.
The beams would be able to support 100.000 tons yes, but not 100.000 tons falling on top of them, that is the difference.
An example would be if you hold a 100.000 ton anvil above one of the towers, with the same surface area as the towers, and dropped it upon the tower, the beams would not be built to handle this, and the whole tower would end up collapsing from the impact of the anvil dropping on top of it: one floor at the time, each floor collapses in about 1/10 of a second as the weight of the anvil above falls on top of it: in 1 second 10 floors would have collapsed.
The collapse was not caused not caused by the crash, it was caused by jet fuel burning, bending the steel beams supporting the structure of the tower.
I can do some math for you:
Each tower weighed about 500,000 tons. The airplanes hit around floor 80. The towers had 110 floor. About 25% of the tower was above where the airplanes hit. That means that the section of the towers coming down, weighed about 100,000 tons, more than enough to crush the floor below and continue down without losing any momentum, once the support of the structure below gave out.
The guy who is amazed that in Russia you can put coins into shopping cart. Or the hippie guru that is anti-war and anti-establishment, and this somehow appeal to the Republicans. But probably the guy selling brain pills to his listeners, as he knows they sure need them.
It falled from jetfuel burning, and steal beams bending, making the towers collapse. Easiest way to debunk that it was not a controlled demolition, is that there was not heard any explosives going off, before the towers came down.
WTC 7 did collapse after taking structural damage from the debris from the two towers coming down right next to it. Among the debris, was liquid aluminum, holding a temperature of 660 degrees Celsius or 1220 degrees Fahrenheit, making WTC 7 catch on fire. The fire fighters in New York had already stormed into the two towers, and was among the victims when they came down, so no firefighters was send into WTC 7 to try and put out the fire there. So instead they let it burn, and collapse.
The skyscrapers did fall from the top, and moved vertically, in a down direction, so most of the towers is going to fall into its own footprint, as there is no force pushing the towers sideways. As it was falling, huge clouds formed, as material from the tower was pulverized from the force of the falling tower, covering New York in a layer of dust.
If the conspiracy is that it was a controlled demolition, and that Mossad had some agents in a parking lot documenting it, then by all means, go with that. Usually this conspiracy falls apart ones it is shown that it was not a controlled demolition.
Because claiming they were dancing is a lie, originating from the father of one of the hijackers of the airplanes of 911, in order to spread hate against Jews. If you want to claim a conspiracy theory to be true, do you not want to make sure that the details are correct?
If a bodyguard takes an extra couple of seconds to holster their weapon, after a Presidential candidate is shot at, I do not take an issue with that. Priority should be keeping alert, with eyes on the crowd, not looking down at your belt.
The Protestant Church also been corrupted, sadly. As the mother is, so is her daughter. There is still a remnant, of pure religion and undefiled before God. Before the Protestant Reformation, when the two witnesses were mourning in the wilderness, the Waldensians, known as the Israel of the Alps, was wiped out by the Harlot Church: as a result, the man of sin was revealed as the Bishop of Rome, and we came out of her. Some 500 years later, God still gives us favor, that I am thankful for. As the Bible prophesied, the deadly wound would be healed, as it begun to happen when the Pope was reinstated control over Vatican City in 1929, and every single US President have visited the Pope there since Eisenhower did so in 1959; and now I see calls for another inquisition, the appetite of the beast is never full.
Why do you call me rabbi? My Master is Christ.
I think this female bodyguard is doing better financially than a lot of Jews in USA.
You might think so, but it is not based on Christian values.
Acts 16
- ¶ And a certaine woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the citie of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard vs: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended vnto the things which were spoken of Paul.
Ruth was also working the fields. While Paul recommended that females and males should stay unmarried, if they can contain themselves; although they do noting wrong if they marry. The idea that the role of females is relegated to staying at home, is from Ancient Greek, where males were wrestling each other naked.
Is it this research you are referencing?
Delivering specific bioactive agents with sufficient bioavailability to the targeted brain area across blood brain barrier remains a big challenge. Magnetically driven nanorobots have demonstrated their potential for controlled drug delivery. However, the dynamic transport of these nanorobots inside each individual's brain vasculature is not yet well studied. Addressing this is a critical step forward to controlled drug delivery for non-invasive brain therapeutics. In this paper, we develop an analytical model describing the personalized dynamic transport of spherical magnetic nanorobots inside the brain vasculature reconstructed from the patient's angiography images.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33016261/
Basically, from what I understand of this, they are moving a piece of metal, on the nanoscale, with a magnet, in a reconstruction of our blood vessels. This is what the research is about. The application is that they want to deliver drugs to a specific part part of our brain, as they think they can attach medicine to a very small piece of metal, that they move in the blood vessels with a magnet.
At no point does she claim that the letter she received is from Tucker Carlsen.