-2
Afks -2 points ago +1 / -3

If you considered the evidence and still believe the spinning globe then thats ok

Best wishes

❤️

4
Afks 4 points ago +4 / -0

WHY CAN'T YOU JUST TRUST THE SCIENCE

-2
Afks -2 points ago +1 / -3

Globe model can’t explain why we see too far

Clock should be obscured from view at 20 miles on the globe model

Globers explanation is that we are seeing a mirage and not the actual clock itself

0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

For what, guy

Helping you see how dumb you are for believing the spinning globe fairy tale?

I believed it too, fren. No shame in considering the evidence against the globe and applying the new information to your life

1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe Ifers.win someday!

1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://ifers.123.st/

That’s the ifers site they were referring to, not ifers.org

4
Afks 4 points ago +4 / -0

The last ditch effort these psychos are going to play is the alien card

If there's extra terrestrials, they are simply beyond Antarctica and not from some other planet or solar system, etc

-1
Afks -1 points ago +2 / -3

This is said everytime FE comes up, and while this is a true statement for other supposed conspiracy theories, it is untrue for FE

There are well poisoners in the FE community as well, pretending to be legitimate FE researchers and get some things right but then intentionally spout off some nonsense to discredit the whole thing

Your comment is reassuring and allows for the globe believers to remain in the comforting delusion they've known their whole lives. It sounds good and it always get some upvotes so most normies just move on and continue to accept the globe and haven't given any of the evidence to the contrary any consideration

1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Micro nova coming?

First I’ve heard of it

Never even heard of a micro nova only supernova

2
Afks 2 points ago +3 / -1

We aren’t orbiting anything so sleep well knowing that the dam burst won’t kill us all

Hopefully they fix their shit because that dam bursting would be a tremendous and unnecessary loss of life

2
Afks 2 points ago +3 / -1

I was banned off GAW almost a year ago for mentioning flat earth in response to someone’s comment

Was some buzz aldrin post and I pointed out he is/was a mason and that many of the astronauts are masons

Permanently banned from GAW; no prior infractions

They probably dig dirt up and hit the target sometimes over there but they are sleeping on flat earth that’s for sure

by nc777
1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Part of me wants to click just to confirm it’s a prolapsed anus but my preference to avoid the image is overpowering my curiosity

Without fail, literally every single time, the globers include ad hominem attacks with their responses

Every single time

by nc777
1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gravity is another unproven theory

Windy mentioned convertible

As in, the atmosphere of the cabin of the convertible car (earths atmosphere) has nothing separating it from the rest of the air (space)

This link explains why that is possible?

Wondering how earths atmosphere doesn’t escape into the void of space

by nc777
1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you a shill?

Point me to the specific part of your link that explains how earths atmosphere is maintained against the vacuum of space without a hard barrier to separate

1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

where on ifers.org is there any flat earth stuff?

https://ifers.123.st/

^ that's the one you're referring to, i'd expect

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did you miss the part about 1,600 km/h

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

no im saying that it won't matter because there is no spin

that x component rapidly diminishes as soon as the hot air balloon leaves the ground

why would the momentum continue if the balloon is no longer attached to the spinning object

by nc777
1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

are you trying to tell me that if i launch a drone in the air to hover above while im in a moving vehicle, you think it'll stay directly overhead without any movement required on the drones part?

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

how much fuel does a hot air balloon need to burn to counteract a 1600km/h spin?

or a bird

or an insect

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well, comparing the train to the aircraft is the big difference as the train is still physically attached to the spinning object

When the helicopter or hot air balloon or bird takes off from the ground, they are no longer attached to the spinning object and so whatever lateral momentum they had from the spin of that object will rapidly diminish as time elapses

Similar example is people use the “throw a baseball up in the air standing on the back of a moving pick up truck”

The baseball will initially move laterally at the same speed as the truck but immediately and quickly slowing down as the atmosphere resists the lateral movement

Comparing this to an aircraft that flies in any direction it pleases with no consequential effect from the supposed spin of the earth

Have you ever questioned the Coriolis effect? They tell us the snipers bullet must account for the spin of the earth but why doesn’t this apply to any other airborne object

Surely if the tiny bullet travelling as fast as a speeding bullet has to account for the spin then everything else would, too?

by nc777
-1
Afks -1 points ago +2 / -3

Your train example is impressively retarded

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

I didn’t specify which direction I’m travelling

You’re just retarded, handshake

by nc777
0
Afks 0 points ago +1 / -1

No need to refer to an apple falling from a tree because globers will tell you the apple and tree are spinning with the earth and so when it drops it is already moving with the spin of the earth

What you could point out are helicopters, airplanes, hot air balloons, birds and insects

These things remain airborne, change their directions, and have no issue combating the supposed 1600 km/h spin (near the equator)

Retards will tell you the earth is pulling all of those things including our atmosphere along in perfect harmony, ignoring the fact that the earth would only be spinning in the same direction always. Think about how that would relate to these airborne objects going any direction they choose

Momentum and inertia don’t explain this

I’m a helicopter. I fly somewhere, anywhere, doesn’t matter. Before I land, I hover for a bit

Why isn’t the earth spinning below me?

No glober can answer this

by nc777
1
Afks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Planar and motionless!

6
Afks 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s a lot of former CIA working for a social media platform

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›