1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cool. Did you hear that Michael Scott declared bankruptcy?

0
AI_ML_Expert 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cool argument. Haven't heard that one before

2
AI_ML_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

And I don't what you all can do. Heard that before. The Karen mantra

2
AI_ML_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, a top mind made its way here.

3
AI_ML_Expert 3 points ago +3 / -0

All influences do is draw lines in the sand to divide. It's all garbage

"If you believe in X ..."

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about a proof of existence by contradiction?

If nothing is eternal then all is temporal. If all is temporal then all had a beginning. If all had a beginning then something came from nothing. Since something can't come from nothing the opposite must be true: at least something is eternal. We call it "God" but "God" as a word holds as much meaning as "dark matter", it's a placeholder variable, nothing more.

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Philosophical Theism or Deism wins. Christianity, Islam, Judaism are all man made

by soma
1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck. Zerohedge exists for controlled opposition

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's my theory.

When the landmarks align with the actual stars in a certain way the nova event will occur.

It goes out of alignment in good times and goes into alignment when the event is close.

Perfect system

by soma
1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the link to the article?

by soma
1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

More fuel for the deist vs theist debate

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if they have issues with creating imaginations?

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or if you have savings you can choose to take time off

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, none would be bad. However, actual words / dialogue is terribly inefficient.

The mind can work much much faster. Consider that whatever it is you're conveying in your internal dialogue the reality is your mind already knows everything about it. Think of it as caching results, or a compiled program vs an interpreted one.

Athletes do this all the time. Consider a baseball player and all the possible decision points that occurs within 1/3rd of a second as a pitch is thrown. How do you think an internal dialogue using words will work out for the hitter vs telepathically running through the decisions at lightning speed so he can react just the right way at just the right time?

The brain can communicate info with itself super fast if you know how to let it.

Instead of words, what happens is that your mind uses visuals and motion like hyroglyphics to represent meaning in super fast forward speed.

2
AI_ML_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

A) you Classification ignores severity of corruption.

B) he's given no real indication previously that he would be a major letdown

C) he was in "The Plot Against the President" so there is some reason to think he's not on the same level as Pelosi.

Thus, your omission of logic is what makes me think you're full of shit, or just dumb

2
AI_ML_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Easily contradicted. Perhaps you're not as smart as you seem to think you are.

-1
AI_ML_Expert -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Q"uartermaster from James Bond...

CasinovRoyal: 911 conspiracy Quantum Solace: Fascism conspiracy SkyFall: Terrorist Corporations Spectre: Intell Agency Coruption Die Another Day: Covid conspiracy

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird, I read that is uses co2 and water. Found that note on the picture in the post.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›