1
0illuminated1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a pretty accurate response as is. What more would you care to know? Basically discernment is just seeing the thing for what is and the other is having some sort of thought/feeling about it... Pretty much irrational...

2
0illuminated1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Forgive the ai response. It's pretty close to what I'd respond if I had more time.

Discernment: The ability to perceive, recognize, or distinguish subtle differences, nuances, or truth from falsehood. It emphasizes insight, clarity, and wisdom—seeing things as they really are without being clouded by bias, emotion, or haste. It's more about perception and understanding (the "seeing" part).

Judgment: The act of forming an opinion, making a decision, or evaluating something/someone as good/bad, right/wrong, better/worse. It often involves conclusion or verdict. It can carry a negative connotation (e.g., being "judgmental" = harshly critical), but in a neutral sense it's simply decision-making or assessment

Basically discernment is just seeing the thing for what is and the other is having some sort of thought/feeling about it... Pretty much irrational.

1
0illuminated1 1 point ago +1 / -0

You confuse discernment with judgement. Your conclusions are both illogical and false.

2
0illuminated1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol asking a question is a personal attack... I guess that answered the question though...

Shine on, you crazy diamond :)

3
0illuminated1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that so? And you are a perfect beacon of light?

Significant personal growth often requires going through difficult or dark experiences. One must go through hell to get to heaven.

This is similar to the idea that a tree must send its roots deep — even into challenging or dark places — in order to grow tall and strong.

All roads ultimately lead to the same place. Whether a person follows a conventional path or takes what appears to be an evil or unconventional one, such as methods associated with Crowley, the underlying aim can be to drop the false self and discover the true self. Different routes may be taken, but they can lead to the same destination of honest self-discovery

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again

2
0illuminated1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aleister Crowley & Christianity: Two Paths, One Truth – Transcending Ego and Surrendering Will

https://youtu.be/F06Dz3HUGEQ

7
0illuminated1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oooh vandalism.... That'll show them!!

2
0illuminated1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some are, some aren't... What we let retard us, to what extent and for how long.. will affect us in our own way I suppose...

I guess I'd compare them on a case by case basis...

5
0illuminated1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Weed smokers are literal retards.

6
0illuminated1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Acknowledging 911 happened as did war crimes. Neat.

6
0illuminated1 6 points ago +6 / -0

So they are actors.

And it's all fake and gay?

No. Cant be... Muh politics can't be just a fake WWF soap opera for retards to stay complacent and locked into a world of make believe...

No way, you are crazy.

4
0illuminated1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lack of critical thinking and sincere love of truth is what rota brains. Chatgpt just helps speed up the process, though can have the opposite outcome for those who love truth more than the world.

Some folks got a.i. derrangment syndrome for sure

7
0illuminated1 7 points ago +7 / -0

You mean theory. It's a theory, not a conspiracy.

Though theories usually have some amount of evidence to back them up

Who is retarded now?

7
0illuminated1 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's ridiculous because not only is there no evidence to substantiate it but also because it's both illogical and highly unlikely.

Surprised this needs to be pointed out.

Makes me curious what other batshit crazy things you believe.

3
0illuminated1 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the original wording, there was no explicit statement that “he was angry.” The point was not about a specific person’s emotional state, but about the general difference between acting through clarity and acting through hostility. The contrast between love and hatred was used to illustrate two modes of perception, not to describe an individual’s actual feelings.

Before one understands the nature of perception, hatred may appear useful. It can feel like a form of power or moral certainty. But once clarity is developed, hatred becomes unnecessary and counterproductive. The only “time” for hatred is the period in which a person has not yet learned to see without distortion. After that, hatred is simply a failure to perceive.

I hope this helps.

3
0illuminated1 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can flush your shit diwn the toilet without having hatred for it.

With love, you can discern a thing properly and deal with it accordingky and bravely.

With anger and hatred you can't see clearly, can't deal with things in the best way and only with boldness, not true bravery.

Angry people are cowards.

Jesus had no hatred

5
0illuminated1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hilarious that people think he is not deep state, when in fact he is just deeper state.

4
0illuminated1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah I thought that was obvious, but I guess not.

The easiest people to fool are those who want to believe.

7
0illuminated1 7 points ago +7 / -0

We lack information that would allow us to answer the question and so we can only speculate.

Some people are happy to jump to conclusions if it suits their narrative or preconceived notions.

I am not one of those people.

8
0illuminated1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Speculation is not evidence.

11
0illuminated1 11 points ago +11 / -0

I found no reputable sources (academic or historical) documenting that Hitler ever issued pardons to people simply because they challenged or opposed age-of-consent laws. Nazi legal history doesn’t support that kind of mass or ideologically motivated “pardoning” in that specific domain.

view more: Next ›