In the original wording, there was no explicit statement that “he was angry.” The point was not about a specific person’s emotional state, but about the general difference between acting through clarity and acting through hostility. The contrast between love and hatred was used to illustrate two modes of perception, not to describe an individual’s actual feelings.
Before one understands the nature of perception, hatred may appear useful. It can feel like a form of power or moral certainty. But once clarity is developed, hatred becomes unnecessary and counterproductive. The only “time” for hatred is the period in which a person has not yet learned to see without distortion. After that, hatred is simply a failure to perceive.
In the original wording, there was no explicit statement that “he was angry.” The point was not about a specific person’s emotional state, but about the general difference between acting through clarity and acting through hostility. The contrast between love and hatred was used to illustrate two modes of perception, not to describe an individual’s actual feelings.
Before one understands the nature of perception, hatred may appear useful. It can feel like a form of power or moral certainty. But once clarity is developed, hatred becomes unnecessary and counterproductive. The only “time” for hatred is the period in which a person has not yet learned to see without distortion. After that, hatred is simply a failure to perceive.
I hope this helps.