Klaus Schwab - "If you take genetic editing, it changes you."
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (3)
sorted by:
a) All given to each one within implies change...taking implies from one another, while ignoring all given change.
b) Change implies procession; taking implies possession...the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
c) Genetic implies generated (life) within generation (inception towards death) aka a potential within a process.
d) Edit/edere - "to give out" implies process giving out potential...taking anything published into possession selects another as ones editor.
e) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from native (life)...if one ignores that; then one gives self up while permitting another to take from one.
f) A suggested genome (sum total of genes within a set) tempts one to ignore perceivable (total generation setting each gene within apart from one another).
As always...few are artificially mixing many together to distract many from nature dividing each native apart from one another.
Is that what happened to him?
Who? Klaus Schwab? Was he ever different from his current state?
Perhaps I don't fully understand your question. Even satanists are not that stupid to take the poison they promote to non-satanists, so... Can you expound on your point?