Prototaxites
(youtube.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
That's clearly an AI video that you're promoting...
Nobody in 3 days noticed that in a conspiracy forum? I find that very curious...
I've been willing to ban ai but it hasn't gained traction yet.. Most just move along if they aren't into it.
Removed rule 1
Thank you for your concern, citizen. Many people these days are very smart but introverted. A.i. can be used for good for them that they can make a video without much production and editing. It can be painful for an introverted person to speak knowing others will hear. A.i. can help them express what they want to express without restriction. This in a video in that vein. I reacted the way i did because you didnt even try. Just reacted. So you got back what you gave amd had exit rush to protect your vain, unfounded, poorly thoughtout comment, that clearly would be called a red herring in a debate setting.
Your comment started off as a defensive argument about you being introverted, and it ended with insults... I wonder if you'd look back at it and think differently about it...
Interesting to watch your reaction on it tho, no arguments, just saying smart people - introverts and insults. I actually checked this "prototaxites" online, as the dumb person I am, and found only other AI videos. No proof whatsoever. And you said you "reacted", which a smart person would know that a reaction doesn't involve rational thinking.
I would like for you to notice that I never attacked you, I attacked the video. And now you defend a clearly fake video... Do you really think that's the position that a smart person would find himself in?
But I would extend an olive branch to you and listen to your argument against everything I've said. I would just remind you that "Hey, I was wrong to share that" is a possible choice. However, one of your insults towards me was "vain", where I expressed nothing of the like, so we can conclude where that stem from... Of course, you couldn't have known that criminal psychology is a hobby of mine, where narrowing down a person's traits has become a sport for me.
I am sure that your reply will not be a... how did you say it... a "poorly thoughtout comment". I would, however, ask about the reason for that "red herring" comment. I have been in debates for many years, how is anything of what I said a "red herring" in a debate setting?
Im sorry google treats you so poorly. I will pray for your algorithm to be healed.
You can easily do it by showing one example that supports your argument.
Notice I focus on the argument, not the person.
1st time for everything
And yet, nobody else shares AI videos.
You sure love your fish
Again, your policing of things here is not needed.
1814 - James and Nathan Rotschild ordered all European rulers to assemble at the Congress of Vienna. The Rothschilds drafted a plan to make it impossible for another Napoleon to rise to power by creating a European Balance of Power - this basically meant that if any European nation revolted against jewish control all the jewish controlled nations would attack it.
1815 - The battle of Waterloo signified the end of Napoleon's heroic anti-jewish rule and the Christian domination of Europe. Both James Rothschild of France and Nathan Rothschild of England financed Wellington's Victory over Napoleon at Waterloo. Nathan Rothschild used false information, about Napoleon winning Waterloo, to defraud the London Stock Exchange and seize control of Britain's economy.
1843 - Prototaxites where first collected; studied 14 years later by Sir John William Dawson; first president of the Royal Society of Canada (an offshoot of the Royal Society of London aka the Invisible College).
1872 - Rival scientist William C. Carruthers (also from the Fellowship of the Royal Society) ridiculed the idea. Carruthers faulted the name Prototaxites (loosely translated as "first yew" and insisted that the name Nematophycus ("stringy alga") be adopted, a move strongly against scientific convention. Despite these attempts to rename the genus, the rules of botanical nomenclature mean that the name "Prototaxites", however inappropriate in meaning, remains in use today.