A message to the Supreme Leader of conspiracies.win
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
A post calling out a questionably installed authority figure that the community wasn't asking for... On a conspiracy forum!!? This cannot stand!! Thanks for fighting the good fight, good sir!
Absolutely retarded take. You have all been without discipline for so long, that the slightest application of it feels like oppression.
What an Internet tough guy tryhard. Cry more
What is it that you think I've done wrong?
I'm not commenting on whether or not something's been done wrong (I haven't been here in months because I feel the quality has dropped off hard, which may or may not be related). I'm simply commenting on how ridiculous it is to call out a post like this as a "subversion of authority" on a conspiracy forum, especially given all the circumstances. Surely, you too, can understand the irony
No Meta posts is now under the no subversion rule 3 here, all the rules are to prevent us infighting, we have bigger battles, but I also think mod transparency should exist, so here we are.
Bigger battles like what? All there is here is the battleground of ideas, no one is spending their time here taking real action, the best you can hope for is someone will take the knowledge they gained here and actually do something with it (though in my past few times here I've been seeing a lot of people talking about things they don't understand and repeating safe edgy viewpoints so I don't know what knowledge is being gained either). That there is a blanket "no subversion" rule that covers meta posts says all that needs to be said about this topic, as noble as your intentions regarding mod transparency may be in a vacuum