In 2022, a whistleblower revealed that a landmark 2006 paper published in Nature was full of falsified data. This paper supported the amyloid hypothesis Alzheimer's; $1.6 billion of wasted NIH funding resulted in a failed attempt to build upon a fake line of inquiry.
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Doctored/Charles-Piller/9781668031254
I need to start keeping a list of these for immediate reference.
Whatever it takes to ensure people don't realize that it's really another form of aquired diabetes
Actually, it's neuroinflammation from seed oils. The insulin resistance of the brain is downstream from chronic inflammation and buildup of and damage by 4-HNE and other toxins, the majority of which originate from seed oil consumption. Aluminum toxicity is likely also a contributing factor.
There are hundreds of versions of dementia. And it's not caused soley be seed oils. Yes, Neuro inflammation, but lots of things cause that, including seed oils.
The plaque from low fat, high carb diet, glycation, causes inflammation too
The only thing wasted is ones consent to any suggested FIAT (let it be done), because doing so wastes fiat/bheue - "to be; exist; grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fiat
One wonders why many keep forgetting this...
A great example for how easy falsification is...instead of falsifying any data; why not simply publish in the name of NATURE to automatically falsify any following data?
Nature cannot falsify...only a native can falsify by ignoring perceivable nature for suggested "nature". Ignorance represents the falsification of reality, because one isn't responding (re) to all (al), but to one another when invoking ignorance.