Rejoice, young man, in your youth, and let your heart cheer you in the days of your youth, and walk in the ways of your heart, and in the sight of your eyes; but know that for all these things God will bring you into judgement. Therefore, remove sorrow from your heart, and put away evil from your flesh; for youth and the dawn of life are vanity.
Remember also your Creator in the days of your youth, before the evil days come, and the years draw near, when you will say, “I have no pleasure in them;” Before the sun, the light, the moon, and the stars are darkened, and the clouds return after the rain; in the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the grinders cease because they are few, and those who look out of the windows are darkened, and the doors shall be shut in the street; when the sound of the grinding is low, and one shall rise up at the voice of a bird, and all the daughters of music shall be brought low; yes, they shall be afraid of heights, and terrors will be on the way; and the almond tree shall blossom, and the grasshopper shall be a burden, and desire shall fail; because man goes to his everlasting home, and the mourners go about the streets; before the silver cord is severed, or the golden bowl is broken, or the pitcher is broken at the spring, or the wheel broken at the cistern, and the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it. “Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher. “All is vanity!” (Ecclesiastes 11:9-12:8)
The second paragraph is a poetic description of the effects of advancing age, and a warning to all young men out there who presently feel invincible, as I once did. Remember your Creator in your youth! You can follow the ways of your heart and the sight of your eyes, but know that for all these things God will bring you into judgement. Youth is vanity and life is but a breath. I urge you to be far more concerned about your eternal home than the vain things of this life.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God didn’t send his Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through him. He who believes in him is not judged. He who doesn’t believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only born Son of God. This is the judgement, that the light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light, for their works were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the light and doesn’t come to the light, lest his works would be exposed. But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be revealed, that they have been done in God.” (John 3:16-21)
How would this not belong anywhere else but a religious forum? Why post it in a conspiracy discussion?
You inviting people to tell you Jesus and God, and all major religions are distractions from our true spiritual connection to the soul?
They don't want us figure out where we are, which is why everyone thinks they are on a globe in space, and they don't want you to figure out who put you here, so the evoke the devine in these religions, playing to our desire to know where we came from. And ultimately, religions prevent us from figuring out what we are, by cutting us off from our spiritual connection and hiding it in a false religion. Jesus was never a real person, God isn't what we are told.
Because if "life is but a breath"; then con (together) spiracy (to breathe) turns life against one another.
Soul/sole implies "one and only"...not connection with.
Divine implies divided from one another; religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind) implies bound to one another...that's why ones free will of choice is required to join any religion.
Few ain't evoking the divine...few evoke the free will of choice of each to bind oneself to many, while ignoring the divine/divide of each from one another.
Well, that's a reason to do anything
This is wierd reply. Connection to the soul is what should always be, one. To break the connection is what religion does. So religion adds a God between the one and only soul.
Btw, ethnology isn't a strong argument, for one, it only referring to one language and two, it ignored context and thus makes up its own logic. It stretches reality to fit the origins of a word instead of handling the argument. Ie, you're not making point, you're changing the subject.
Which is, religions are established by shitheads that came before us, and religions are traps to prevent you from seeing, and from realizing self
Breathing doesn't require reason.
One does not connect to the soul...all implies soul/sole animating each one coming into being within by division/divination.
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...it's the fluidity moving through each solidified being which represents the soul. Fluidity doesn't connect; it internally divides each solid from one another.
Male + female have to be divided from one another to be able to have intercourse with one another for further off-spring from one another.
Nature gives each being a break from one another. Nature represents an analytical process separating essence (life) during transference (inception towards death).
Connection aka con (together) nect (to bind) ion (action) implies an artificial synthesis during natural analysis.
Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind) implies ones consent to a suggested artificial synthesis.
Few are utilizing religion to tempt many into forming connection.
a) Only nature adds (inception) and subtracts (death) each divided being (life), while giving each the opportunity to multiply through one another.
b) God implies the one and only soul for each being (life) inBEtween origin (inception) and outcome (death).
Using non-religious descriptions...motion > momentum > matter aka cause > division > effect.
c) Religion implies ones response (re) to bondage (ligo) suggested by another aka ONES CHOICE selecting a CHOSEN ONE above self. Religion tempts one to choose an authority over ones free will of choice...not an addition; but a subtraction of self.
Logy (logic) tricks ones mind to argue against another within conflicts of reason like strong vs weak. That's artificial. Nature uses implication (if/then) which aren't in a circular conflict against each another, but imply delineation aka opposites within the same line.
As for ethno (band of people living together)...that's an artificial synthesis tempting one to ignore the implied natural analysis of PER (by) SON (sound) aka sound > spectrum > instrument.
What does instrument imply? Each mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound...it's banding minds together into a hive mind aka collective consciousness aka egregore aka groupthink aka gestalt intelligence aka mind coalescence etc. which establishes arguments aka distractions from a sound mind.
There can be only one aka one sound for each instrumental language/lingua (tongue) within.
Two implies suggested dualism established by ONEs consent to it. There are no two tongues in nature, but dualism tempts one to articulated words within natural sound, thereby splitting/forking ones tongue in two aka the snake mythology.
Con (together) text/teks (to weave)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/context
Artificially weaving together (into a world wide web for example) tempts one to ignore what nature sets apart from one another. It's few who utilize suggestion to weave many together into a consensus which represents rule by context.
Logos (any word suggested in the name of God) > logic (circular thinking about the suggested word) > reason (turning against one another about the suggested word).
One cannot use logic without consenting to suggested logos aka giving self up to ownership of another aka one who speaks in the name of (e nomine) God.
God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all)...speech implies the articulation of natural sound aka the turning away from creator towards creation.
The word "all" doesn't mean ALL because one can add any other word to the word "all"...one (effect) cannot add anything to ALL (cause).
A being cannot add anything to nature...only shape everything nature offers or ignore nature for mental (ideals) and physical (idols) artifice shaped by one another.
How does one know the difference between natural and artificial? Nature moves and cannot be held onto, whatever one mentally or physically holds onto becomes artificial. For oneself...nature implies given; artifice implies taking.
The origin of word implies sound. Sound stretches (inception towards death) instrument (life)...word compresses instrument into argument against one another.
Few suggest words to tempt many into argument, which makes it easier for few to handle many within sound, because sound sets each instrument free, while words keep many instruments in bondage.
a) Change (inception towards death) objectifies (life)....ignoring change subjects an object to one another.
b) Inception implies the sentencing of life towards POINT of death. Few suggest dialectic to tempt many to share and hold onto "points" of view, which thereby distorts each ones sentence aka sentience.
Being implies the written sentence...focusing on any point permits another to write the end of ones sentence.
RE (to respond) LIGO (to bind) ION (action)...action implies nature; bondage implies artifice; response implies ones free will of choice in-between natural (perception) and artificial (suggestion).
The shithead shapes the word "religion" by synthesizing response; bondage, and action together...the bigger shithead consents to the synthesis without analyzing it.
The issue isn't few suggesting religions; but many consenting to join.
More spell-craft shenanigans...BEFORE implies to forward (inception towards death) being (life) aka the status quo of coming into being. US aka "to unite states" implies suggested collectivism by few tempting many together.
Entrapment aka en (within) trap (contrivance for catching unawares) ment (mind) refers to suggestion as the contrivance to catch consent.
Religion; science; entertainment; politics; economics etc. represent different labels for the same process of farming consensus.
Ok, whatever
Only during vanity (inception towards death) can modesty (life) come into being. The issue with vanity is ones immodest choice to hold onto, which transforms everything into nothing, with nothing representing ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything given by wanting to hold onto it.
All implies animation...each breath within an exhalation.
Everything implies vanity; each thing within implies modesty..."things" implies immodestly holding together what vanity sets modestly apart from one another.
Things implies plurality (synthesis); life implies singularity (analysis)...to shape a plurality requires a singularity to hold onto something.
All implies light (motion) animating spectrum (momentum) for each ray (matter) within...each shining ray casts darkness upon each other, which by holding onto mentally (ideal) and physically (idol) intensifies.
Darkness cannot darken the light...only dim each ray within by obscuring sight.
Holding onto truth or false tempts one to ignore the motion of light, hence re-TURNING self to light, while TURNING (truth vs false) against one another.
Light delineates; darkness encircles...