What's with the half-ass, pseudo-intellectual, and factually wrong etymology? None of this actually "implies" anything, it's just some stream of consciousness nonsense you strung together.
Everything (cause) implies each thing (effect). All of nature implicates; each being within either responses to implication (perception) or reason (suggested) depending on ones free will of choice.
some stream of consciousness nonsense you strung together.
Free will of choice analyses by setting apart, hence utilizing etymological and phonetic roots upon spells few crafted together to deceive many with synthesis.
Center implies "middle point of a circle"; middle implies "in-between extremes". How does one shape a circle? By putting extremes together...
Does nature put extremes together or does nature divide each middle (life) in-between extremes (inception/death)?
What if all implies the way for each heave/hebban - "to lift, raise; lift up, exalt" within?
What's with the half-ass, pseudo-intellectual, and factually wrong etymology? None of this actually "implies" anything, it's just some stream of consciousness nonsense you strung together.
Example?
Everything (cause) implies each thing (effect). All of nature implicates; each being within either responses to implication (perception) or reason (suggested) depending on ones free will of choice.
What isn't actual is none/nan - "not one, not any, no person; not the least part"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=none
Free will of choice analyses by setting apart, hence utilizing etymological and phonetic roots upon spells few crafted together to deceive many with synthesis.
This is the most pretentious bunch of bullshit I've ever read. You sound like a sophomore junior college English major trying to impress a professor.
I'm still waiting for an example of factually wrong etymology...
"This is not an exit" implies some online faggot is talking about his butthole
Wrong again, Vlad
Speaking of which have u seen muh drawings vlad u neber comment on muh posts anymore