Ein Sof, Grand Architect, Holy Fire, Shekinah, and the rest are all titles stolen from the real God. Calling someone "God" or any other title doesn't make it so; the real God is demonstrated by the fitness of his being and doing to his names and titles. "To Ov" is similarly ultra-generic in Greek and is just Aristotelian for "The Being", which anyone can fill with any attribute right or wrong.
Leviathan in the Bible is not God, so identifying Leviathan with a title like Shekinah or Messiah that is proper to God is simple idolatry and Texe is right about that. Note that this goddess has a parent, i.e. Chaos (Tohu and Bohu), and/or perhaps Pit (bor). That is not Judaism, it's a couple of feminist Jews who the rabbis tolerate but can't rein in despite their contradicting Torah and Talmud.
Now, Kabbalah in Judaism is like a borderline cult in Christianity, namely, it's not something that sets itself apart from the mainstream, but it allows both the mainstream and those who radically disagree with it to work together despite their core disagreement. So there are a couple priniciples that would be in common with Judaism and Christianity, and then there are people who pretend that Kabbalah ought to be some very cultic stuff, but there's not usually an official distinction of which Kabbalah is correct. Truth pursuers can say simply, the confusion of God and Creation is incorrect, and anything affirming God's actual place, title, and distinction is correct as far as that affirmation goes. But it requires distinctions. It appears you're getting a bit better at making those distinctions.
Please stop posting multihour videos without summaries or transcripts as this is not a clickbait site but an elite research facility. That could be regarded as subversion or low quality. Since your comments usually aren't low quality, it would help if you gave your thoughts (with timestamps) as to what you post so that the original material can be interacted with efficiently.
I don't defend the chicken sacrifices; I don't understand them. But all witchcraft "sin transfer" is a counterfeit based on the sin transfer that the real Jesus did. You do believe he died because your sins were transferred to him, and his eternal life was transferred to you, right?
Tikkun Olam ( ̶R̶e̶p̶a̶i̶r̶i̶n̶g̶ Enslaving the World)
Tikkun olam aka "repairing the world by bringing together"...it's togetherness which binds ones free will of choice to others. Slavery implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion by a joined contract. The suggestion of another cannot master without consent by ones free will of choice to slavery.
there's power in the universe INCLUDING your god
God (cause) frees power (effect) inherently...a jew suggests uni (one) verse (to turn) from cause towards affect. If a gentile consents to any jewish suggestion; then ones choice empowers a chosen one.
I as a jew am stronger than that. My name is israel.
It's gentiles empowering jewish suggestions which makes the jew stronger than gentiles, while israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
Striving (life) with God (inception towards death) implies the status quo of being, which a gentile ignores when consenting to any suggestion by a jew.
I die with my faith intact
Intact/intactus - "untouched"...for it's the gentiles who touch and hold onto jewish suggestions mentally (ideal) and physically (idol).
Faith isn't the TRUST in one another; but the THRUST (inception towards death) of being (life) aka that within which one dies.
There's nothing you can do
Because gentile consent to jewish suggestion implies de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of perceivable.
Repair aka re (to respond) pair (a set of two, two of a kind coupled in use)...if one responds to two; then one damages oneself.
A jew suggests dualism to distract gentiles from EIN (one) SOPH (to know) aka from discerning self as being one unit (perception) within singularity (perceivable).
2800 slaves
2+8=10 aka 1 (singularity) + 0 (nihilism)...it's denying singularity (perception) by consenting to dualism (suggestion) which represents slave selecting master.
This is taken from a litany of false quotes. The cite is a poorly spelled author's name and a useless page number, and has nothing to do with androgynes or subhumans. I did locate the book and paragraph, which is a medieval source correctly called Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 499 (by Shimon haDarshan) and actually reads, "Each of Israel will have thousands and thousands of slaves to him." It would be more to the point to quote Talmud, Shabbat 32b, "Anyone who is vigilant in ritual fringes merits two thousand eight hundred servants will serve him." However, this is merely an imaginative reading of Zech. 8:23 (10 men, 70 nations, 4 fringes) and as such the correct reading is promised to every grafted-in covenant believer: "Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you." If the Christian believes the correct interpretation of this passage is some spiritual taking hold of the Christians (spiritual Jews) by the nations, and that this is a valid promise, then it's merely a matter of what the correct interpretation is.
I respect if you don't use the idiom "spiritual Jews" that's often used, I apologize for not recalling your whole system. Yes, Jesus Christ is the almighty Creator in the flesh, and we follow him, and he will defeat all antichrists.
Are followers of Jesus not the "Israel of God" described by Paul? If not from the Old Testament, from where do Jesus's people find the truth of things in earlier history? What did Jesus say about the Old Testament?
Are you just using general Christian teaching that the Antichrist (serpent messiah) will enslave everybody, and applying it to Gentiles only? Have you noticed that the Antichrist's mistreatment of Israel (as in Isaiah 28) is uniquely severe?
When the real Jesus comes, what will be the social status of those who don't accept him? Won't they either be subject to death if they commit capital offenses, or become subject to Jesus's reign but not as citizens because they don't accept his rule? There's not a problem comparatively with the fact that all Abrahamic religions are triumphalist and state a lower status for those who don't believe that flows naturally from their unbelief. Things worth thinking about.
I didn't say modern Israel. Do you believe the Bible, or if you don't then how do you know the truth about Jesus? What does Paul mean by saying "Israel of God"? You do understand that things were different back then and yet Jesus and Paul are a continuous body with us. Has the Bible's term "Israel of God" changed so that we can't use it anymore?
I didn't ask about the antichrist's order but about Jesus's order. Are there no unbelievers left because Jesus kills them all? So only believers for a thousand years on earth? Why does Zechariah 14:17-19 say there will be nations that don't follow Jesus even after he is revealed as Messiah-Christ? He doesn't kill them but instead withholds rain from them. These are sincere questions because I don't argue about eschatology seeing it hasn't happened yet.
I love Texe.
Ein Sof, Grand Architect, Holy Fire, Shekinah, and the rest are all titles stolen from the real God. Calling someone "God" or any other title doesn't make it so; the real God is demonstrated by the fitness of his being and doing to his names and titles. "To Ov" is similarly ultra-generic in Greek and is just Aristotelian for "The Being", which anyone can fill with any attribute right or wrong.
Leviathan in the Bible is not God, so identifying Leviathan with a title like Shekinah or Messiah that is proper to God is simple idolatry and Texe is right about that. Note that this goddess has a parent, i.e. Chaos (Tohu and Bohu), and/or perhaps Pit (bor). That is not Judaism, it's a couple of feminist Jews who the rabbis tolerate but can't rein in despite their contradicting Torah and Talmud.
Now, Kabbalah in Judaism is like a borderline cult in Christianity, namely, it's not something that sets itself apart from the mainstream, but it allows both the mainstream and those who radically disagree with it to work together despite their core disagreement. So there are a couple priniciples that would be in common with Judaism and Christianity, and then there are people who pretend that Kabbalah ought to be some very cultic stuff, but there's not usually an official distinction of which Kabbalah is correct. Truth pursuers can say simply, the confusion of God and Creation is incorrect, and anything affirming God's actual place, title, and distinction is correct as far as that affirmation goes. But it requires distinctions. It appears you're getting a bit better at making those distinctions.
Please stop posting multihour videos without summaries or transcripts as this is not a clickbait site but an elite research facility. That could be regarded as subversion or low quality. Since your comments usually aren't low quality, it would help if you gave your thoughts (with timestamps) as to what you post so that the original material can be interacted with efficiently.
This is not that lol. This is a schitzo and bot playground.
I don't defend the chicken sacrifices; I don't understand them. But all witchcraft "sin transfer" is a counterfeit based on the sin transfer that the real Jesus did. You do believe he died because your sins were transferred to him, and his eternal life was transferred to you, right?
Tikkun olam aka "repairing the world by bringing together"...it's togetherness which binds ones free will of choice to others. Slavery implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion by a joined contract. The suggestion of another cannot master without consent by ones free will of choice to slavery.
God (cause) frees power (effect) inherently...a jew suggests uni (one) verse (to turn) from cause towards affect. If a gentile consents to any jewish suggestion; then ones choice empowers a chosen one.
It's gentiles empowering jewish suggestions which makes the jew stronger than gentiles, while israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
Striving (life) with God (inception towards death) implies the status quo of being, which a gentile ignores when consenting to any suggestion by a jew.
Intact/intactus - "untouched"...for it's the gentiles who touch and hold onto jewish suggestions mentally (ideal) and physically (idol).
Faith isn't the TRUST in one another; but the THRUST (inception towards death) of being (life) aka that within which one dies.
Because gentile consent to jewish suggestion implies de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of perceivable.
Repair aka re (to respond) pair (a set of two, two of a kind coupled in use)...if one responds to two; then one damages oneself.
A jew suggests dualism to distract gentiles from EIN (one) SOPH (to know) aka from discerning self as being one unit (perception) within singularity (perceivable).
2+8=10 aka 1 (singularity) + 0 (nihilism)...it's denying singularity (perception) by consenting to dualism (suggestion) which represents slave selecting master.
This is taken from a litany of false quotes. The cite is a poorly spelled author's name and a useless page number, and has nothing to do with androgynes or subhumans. I did locate the book and paragraph, which is a medieval source correctly called Yalkut Shimoni on Nach 499 (by Shimon haDarshan) and actually reads, "Each of Israel will have thousands and thousands of slaves to him." It would be more to the point to quote Talmud, Shabbat 32b, "Anyone who is vigilant in ritual fringes merits two thousand eight hundred servants will serve him." However, this is merely an imaginative reading of Zech. 8:23 (10 men, 70 nations, 4 fringes) and as such the correct reading is promised to every grafted-in covenant believer: "Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you." If the Christian believes the correct interpretation of this passage is some spiritual taking hold of the Christians (spiritual Jews) by the nations, and that this is a valid promise, then it's merely a matter of what the correct interpretation is.
I respect if you don't use the idiom "spiritual Jews" that's often used, I apologize for not recalling your whole system. Yes, Jesus Christ is the almighty Creator in the flesh, and we follow him, and he will defeat all antichrists.
Are followers of Jesus not the "Israel of God" described by Paul? If not from the Old Testament, from where do Jesus's people find the truth of things in earlier history? What did Jesus say about the Old Testament?
Are you just using general Christian teaching that the Antichrist (serpent messiah) will enslave everybody, and applying it to Gentiles only? Have you noticed that the Antichrist's mistreatment of Israel (as in Isaiah 28) is uniquely severe?
When the real Jesus comes, what will be the social status of those who don't accept him? Won't they either be subject to death if they commit capital offenses, or become subject to Jesus's reign but not as citizens because they don't accept his rule? There's not a problem comparatively with the fact that all Abrahamic religions are triumphalist and state a lower status for those who don't believe that flows naturally from their unbelief. Things worth thinking about.
I didn't say modern Israel. Do you believe the Bible, or if you don't then how do you know the truth about Jesus? What does Paul mean by saying "Israel of God"? You do understand that things were different back then and yet Jesus and Paul are a continuous body with us. Has the Bible's term "Israel of God" changed so that we can't use it anymore?
I didn't ask about the antichrist's order but about Jesus's order. Are there no unbelievers left because Jesus kills them all? So only believers for a thousand years on earth? Why does Zechariah 14:17-19 say there will be nations that don't follow Jesus even after he is revealed as Messiah-Christ? He doesn't kill them but instead withholds rain from them. These are sincere questions because I don't argue about eschatology seeing it hasn't happened yet.