IMO, there is a difference between the two. predictive programming, this method serves to gradually introduce and familiarize the public with future events or ideas, this way shaping our perceptions and, more disturbing, our acceptance of them.
There is a sibling to this called Revelation of the Method, or RoM. RoM is an esoteric concept in which controllers deliberately reveal their hidden agendas or methods through symbolism and media. This disclosure serves an occult or ritualistic purpose, allowing the elite to absolve themselves of moral responsibility by forcing the public to witness and acknowledge their own manipulation.
Differentiation can only exist within singularity..."two" implies suggested dualism tempting ones consent to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
Example..inception and death are not TWO, but ONE process for each ONE potential living within.
Revelation of the Method...Predictive Programming
Revelation implies revealed (life) by action (inception towards death). Anything nature brings into being implies revelation.
Method aka meta (to pursuit) hodos (way) implies the suggestion of an artificial outcome to distract ones perception from natural revelation.
Predictive aka pre (before) dict (to show). All perceivable was shown to each perceiving being before any suggestion can be shown to one another.
Programming aka pro (forward) gram (to write). Nature forwards each being before a being can shape writing to describe nature to one another.
As for the differences...revelation implies natural origin; method implies an artificial outcome, so nature was revealing before any method can be "revealed" by any being. It's about tricking one to ignore the natural revelation for the artificial reveal by method of anything one ignores.
It's consenting to the suggested method which represents the program written into self, which permits another to predict the natural revelation one ignores.
method serves
Few suggest methods to tempt many into a consensus by giving individual consent to serve another. A method doesn't serve...it's being carried by anyone preserving it by consent.
this way shaping our perceptions and, more disturbing, our acceptance of them
There's only one way (inception towards death) within which perception (life) can be shaped...the way which moves forwards no matter if perception is disturbed by acceptance or denial of suggestion.
There is a sibling to this called Revelation of the Method
Sibling/sibja/swe - "self" implies nature diving fe-male within male from one another to allow inter-course with one another for off-spring from one another, which is how SELF sustenance requires perpetuation through one another.
The self implies the process of revelation...others suggest methods to tempt ones consent into taking possession. Process implies giving; possess implies taking...a contradiction.
esoteric concept
Nature implies exo (outer); being implies eso (inner)...teric/téreó - "to keep" implies inner potential ignoring outer process by keeping within possession.
Inner (perception) ignores outer (perception) when holding (consent) onto (suggestion)...the latter consent to any suggestion represents the shaping of a con (together) cept (to take).
Nature doesn't conceptualize...nature visualizes by divided each visible being from one another.
reveal their hidden agendas
Agenda/agent/action implies enacting nature revealing each re-acting being. Nature only reveals...it's a being who hides from nature by consenting to any suggested agendas by another.
There's nothing hidden from free will of choice...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation by seeking explanation from one another.
ritualistic purpose
Ritual/rite/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies nature putting forwards (pur) the position (pose) of each being by dividing each from one another.
Few draw circles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many to distract from the one and only rite of passage (inception towards death) for each passenger (life) within.
Nature implies the force which privatizes each being from one another...few shape a consensus called "public" by tempting many to hold onto one another, thereby ignoring the natural force which empowers the being to be able to hold onto one another.
Law Enforcement implies natural law forcing mind into being... which one ignores when mentally and physically following suggested laws by another. Asking any law enforcement officer why the use of force gets the answer: "I'm just following orders".
IMO, there is a difference between the two. predictive programming, this method serves to gradually introduce and familiarize the public with future events or ideas, this way shaping our perceptions and, more disturbing, our acceptance of them.
There is a sibling to this called Revelation of the Method, or RoM. RoM is an esoteric concept in which controllers deliberately reveal their hidden agendas or methods through symbolism and media. This disclosure serves an occult or ritualistic purpose, allowing the elite to absolve themselves of moral responsibility by forcing the public to witness and acknowledge their own manipulation.
Differentiation can only exist within singularity..."two" implies suggested dualism tempting ones consent to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
Example..inception and death are not TWO, but ONE process for each ONE potential living within.
As for the differences...revelation implies natural origin; method implies an artificial outcome, so nature was revealing before any method can be "revealed" by any being. It's about tricking one to ignore the natural revelation for the artificial reveal by method of anything one ignores.
It's consenting to the suggested method which represents the program written into self, which permits another to predict the natural revelation one ignores.
Few suggest methods to tempt many into a consensus by giving individual consent to serve another. A method doesn't serve...it's being carried by anyone preserving it by consent.
There's only one way (inception towards death) within which perception (life) can be shaped...the way which moves forwards no matter if perception is disturbed by acceptance or denial of suggestion.
Sibling/sibja/swe - "self" implies nature diving fe-male within male from one another to allow inter-course with one another for off-spring from one another, which is how SELF sustenance requires perpetuation through one another.
The self implies the process of revelation...others suggest methods to tempt ones consent into taking possession. Process implies giving; possess implies taking...a contradiction.
Nature implies exo (outer); being implies eso (inner)...teric/téreó - "to keep" implies inner potential ignoring outer process by keeping within possession.
Inner (perception) ignores outer (perception) when holding (consent) onto (suggestion)...the latter consent to any suggestion represents the shaping of a con (together) cept (to take).
Nature doesn't conceptualize...nature visualizes by divided each visible being from one another.
Agenda/agent/action implies enacting nature revealing each re-acting being. Nature only reveals...it's a being who hides from nature by consenting to any suggested agendas by another.
There's nothing hidden from free will of choice...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation by seeking explanation from one another.
Ritual/rite/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies nature putting forwards (pur) the position (pose) of each being by dividing each from one another.
Few draw circles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many to distract from the one and only rite of passage (inception towards death) for each passenger (life) within.
Natural delineation implies purpose; artificial circulation implies aimlessness.
Nature implies the force which privatizes each being from one another...few shape a consensus called "public" by tempting many to hold onto one another, thereby ignoring the natural force which empowers the being to be able to hold onto one another.
Law Enforcement implies natural law forcing mind into being... which one ignores when mentally and physically following suggested laws by another. Asking any law enforcement officer why the use of force gets the answer: "I'm just following orders".