Yup...long winded, drawn out explanations that need to be go into mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model. It's expected at this point.
U know when a kid makes up a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation?
That's what always happens when arguing the stand point of the mainstream narrative based on lies.. That's why we see NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now...😅
We aren't moving, nor is there any curve. Trust your senses not a bunch of masons.
This is what I mean when I say I find this whole thing so bizarre. Assuming you are not trolling, I would love to know what is so confusing about "the earth is roughly a sphere, to a smaller extent the middle bulges out less than 1/100 than the top and bottom, and to an even smaller extent the top is a bit less than 1/100000 times farther than the bottom."
I honestly find this to be so simple an idea that I cannot even fathom why someone would describe it as "mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model" or "a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation," or "NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now."
If you could, could you tell me specifically what aspect of this you are referring to? I am assuming you cannot but I am just curious if you even have an answer.
Yup...long winded, drawn out explanations that need to be go into mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model. It's expected at this point.
U know when a kid makes up a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation?
That's what always happens when arguing the stand point of the mainstream narrative based on lies.. That's why we see NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now...😅
We aren't moving, nor is there any curve. Trust your senses not a bunch of masons.
This is what I mean when I say I find this whole thing so bizarre. Assuming you are not trolling, I would love to know what is so confusing about "the earth is roughly a sphere, to a smaller extent the middle bulges out less than 1/100 than the top and bottom, and to an even smaller extent the top is a bit less than 1/100000 times farther than the bottom."
I honestly find this to be so simple an idea that I cannot even fathom why someone would describe it as "mental gymnastics to try to explain the idiocy of tge heliocentric model" or "a lie and then it compounds into a convoluted explanation," or "NDG getting tripped up calling the shape a pear now."
If you could, could you tell me specifically what aspect of this you are referring to? I am assuming you cannot but I am just curious if you even have an answer.