In what percentages? Who owned the insurance and banking concerns where did that wealth go? Also who owned slaves. What are the hard numbers?
So now the question is, why our collective history as taught has edited out the nuance of the slave trade and allowed all of us to walk away with divisive fairy tail or victim narratives?
Slavery was NOT a white man's burden alone. Jews and even blacks took part. Stop presenting it as such. Slaves were extremely valuable. What percentage of whites owned slaves?
Jews were VERY active in the slave trade if not the primary actors. Stop writing them out of it. Particularly when they seem to enjoy becoming "allies" that foment racial division.
Blacks, while victimized, were not purely victims in the US or on The Continent. Blacks sold blacks into slavery. Blacks in the Americas owned blacks. Slavery still exists on The Continent. Why do we ignore this nuance?
It was a human experience not unique to the USA. It was also our COLLECTIVE triumph to put the crap behind us and move forward TOGETHER. These BS hero/victim narratives have damaged our ability to unify.
Who is controlling the media, politics, and texts pushing those BS narratives?
Unironically, evil is corrosive and self-destructive, and committing such acts on other people always comes back one way or another, but not in some fair and cosmic kind of karmic justice, but as a disgusting petulant curse because it is not caused by good. It's the consequence of evil, so it is likewise evil.
Agent of Chaos causing chaos. WSA will post how unity of the Marxists allows them to crush the Right in elections and follow that up with a post to fracture and divide the Right along racial/ethnic lines. See who is the ultimate benefactor?
You literally don't have enough data to draw conclusions and this idiot made sure not to clearly source his data. Let's just look at this with common sense...
Where in America are you going to get a "black jury"? What county/city? He also fails to acknowledge that both the prosecution and the defense must BOTH approve of the jurors. So there is no "black jury".
The FACT is that blacks acquit more often than whites and that holds true for both black AND white defendants. All white jury pools convict blacks at SIGNIFICANTLY higher rates than whites at a 16% discrepancy. Conviction rates equalize on juries where at least 1 black person is present.
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have REPEATEDLY been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
I contest that the jury nullification in the OJ trial was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of LE and the prosecution.
I presented my data. Blacks do not have the numerical strength required to skew conviction rates for whites in America. This man is whipping up division among the Right based on baseless nonsense.
Why don't you seem to have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
I like how you completely refused to process the FACT that a white serial killer was active in the area and literally worked at that woman's house. Also, how white bias or the fact that one black on the jury only resulted in EQUALIZATION of conviction rates not an increase for whites or blacks. Instead, you double down.
You point to a BS civil trial as more evidence? Do you even understand the difference?
You are literally immune to data that disproves your worldview. It is a perfect example of why this poster, WSA, and that idiot in the video are Agents of Chaos pushing an agenda. There is bias, but it is NOT what is presented.
Southern whites should have picked their own damn cotton.
Now look into who actually owned the slave ships and sold the slaves.
My guess is that plantations were often owned by "white" people not white people.
The same people still don't believe in doing their own work.
I looked. It's both Whites and Jews.
In what percentages? Who owned the insurance and banking concerns where did that wealth go? Also who owned slaves. What are the hard numbers?
So now the question is, why our collective history as taught has edited out the nuance of the slave trade and allowed all of us to walk away with divisive fairy tail or victim narratives?
Slavery was NOT a white man's burden alone. Jews and even blacks took part. Stop presenting it as such. Slaves were extremely valuable. What percentage of whites owned slaves?
Jews were VERY active in the slave trade if not the primary actors. Stop writing them out of it. Particularly when they seem to enjoy becoming "allies" that foment racial division.
Blacks, while victimized, were not purely victims in the US or on The Continent. Blacks sold blacks into slavery. Blacks in the Americas owned blacks. Slavery still exists on The Continent. Why do we ignore this nuance?
It was a human experience not unique to the USA. It was also our COLLECTIVE triumph to put the crap behind us and move forward TOGETHER. These BS hero/victim narratives have damaged our ability to unify.
Who is controlling the media, politics, and texts pushing those BS narratives?
Unironically, evil is corrosive and self-destructive, and committing such acts on other people always comes back one way or another, but not in some fair and cosmic kind of karmic justice, but as a disgusting petulant curse because it is not caused by good. It's the consequence of evil, so it is likewise evil.
Exactly.
Agent of Chaos causing chaos. WSA will post how unity of the Marxists allows them to crush the Right in elections and follow that up with a post to fracture and divide the Right along racial/ethnic lines. See who is the ultimate benefactor?
You literally don't have enough data to draw conclusions and this idiot made sure not to clearly source his data. Let's just look at this with common sense...
Where in America are you going to get a "black jury"? What county/city? He also fails to acknowledge that both the prosecution and the defense must BOTH approve of the jurors. So there is no "black jury".
The FACT is that blacks acquit more often than whites and that holds true for both black AND white defendants. All white jury pools convict blacks at SIGNIFICANTLY higher rates than whites at a 16% discrepancy. Conviction rates equalize on juries where at least 1 black person is present.
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
So the phenomenon of jury nullification like in the OJ trial are all outliers?
Or maybe OJ was found not guilty because he was actually not guilty and/or the prosecution was not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Hilariously, you have seen no evidence and believe OJ did it. Why? 'Cause big strong black man? Maybe it was the white serial killer handy man that Nicole employed that later bragged about the murders?
https://people.com/casanova-killer-who-claims-he-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson-set-to-die-11716652
The man's own brother says he did it!:
https://www.cnn.com/2012/11/20/justice/o-j-simpson-film-claim
Not even a prolific serial killer operating in the area, at the specific property, and bragging on the murder can plant a seed of doubt in your mind! You KNOW the black guy did it! Lol.
The FACT about jury bias is that white juries have REPEATEDLY been shown to show bias when convicting blacks. Juries that consist of ONE black person equalize conviction rates for blacks and whites.:
https://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy
I contest that the jury nullification in the OJ trial was NOT about race and about the piss poor job of LE and the prosecution.
I presented my data. Blacks do not have the numerical strength required to skew conviction rates for whites in America. This man is whipping up division among the Right based on baseless nonsense.
Why don't you seem to have the same high bar for proof to support your prejudiced beliefs?
OJ was guilty as hell, just as he was found guilty by a civil trial, and just as he admitted it with his expose book in a circumscribed way.
Madness.
I like how you completely refused to process the FACT that a white serial killer was active in the area and literally worked at that woman's house. Also, how white bias or the fact that one black on the jury only resulted in EQUALIZATION of conviction rates not an increase for whites or blacks. Instead, you double down.
You point to a BS civil trial as more evidence? Do you even understand the difference?
You are literally immune to data that disproves your worldview. It is a perfect example of why this poster, WSA, and that idiot in the video are Agents of Chaos pushing an agenda. There is bias, but it is NOT what is presented.
Madness indeed.
Stirring the pot. They have been hyping up racial division from all angles since Occupy Wallstreet.