What would happen to a modern(ish) country is every power plant, bridge, and water treatment plant were destroyed inside a one week period?
The US could certainly do this. But it might not be advisable.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
People attach meaning to words.
Go read some Heidegger or something.
This is extremely borish.
a) A person uses free will of choice to attach self (singular) to a people (plural)...attachment restricts free will of choice. Few suggest artificial pluralism to distract many from natural singularity.
There can be only one.
b) Attaching implies synthesis (putting together)...to put anything together requires each thing to be divided apart (analysis) from one another.
Few invert natural analysis with artificial synthesis to shape attachment among many called "consensus".
c) Meaning implies a measure taken by ones mind from what the mind of another suggested. Being implies all perceivable moving through each ones perception...a being cannot hold onto perceivable without ignoring that all moves.
Meaning implies possession...being implies potential within procession. Few suggest meaning to burden the potential of many with possession.
d) Sound generates in-stru-ment (mind structured within)...only after that can an instrument shape a word, which represents spell-craft.
Words are shaped by LETTERS aka by ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words. You represent the letter of any word others are shaping for you to use for communication.
Sound cannot be described by words without distracting instrument (perception) from natural (perceivable) with artificial (suggested).
Nature divides being...few suggest words to distract many from division with labels attached to mind.
a) DASEIN aka DA (there) SEIN (being) implies a beings perception of perceivable differentiation from one another as here (me) and there (you).
The issue...if a being labels "here" and "there", then it ignores the ongoing motion which divides each temporary being from one another.
If motion implies singularity, then each single unit of matter within cannot be "here" or "there"....only in-between aka as above/so below.
From a different perspective...if form (life) within flow (inception towards death), then simultaneous perception of living/dying from in-between. If ones mind attaches "here" to living and "there" to dying, then one mentally ignores physical procession.
b) "Heidegger's magnum opus, Being and Time (1927), is widely considered one of the most significant works of modern philosophy."
"This question (of being), he believed, had been neglected or obscured throughout the history of Western philosophy"
Who defines his work as significant philosophy, while ignoring him describing philosophy as neglected and obscured? Where does the signal come from...perceivable or suggested?
Heidegger's DASEIN implies one thing (sein) among (da) another thing (dort)...a separation from one another. Something aka "sum of things" implies a unification together.
Few suggest unification (synthesis) to distract many from separation (analysis).
IS implies versus ISN'T...that conflict of reason represents mental confinement. You holding onto one extreme while fighting the other...makes whatever I describe from outside seem borish.
FREE will of choice will be perceived as uncultivated by a mind bound to extremes. Why does analyzing this doesn't feel borish to me?
ugh.. what a waste of time effort and money. blocked.
TheMafia blocking free-will-of-choice...