There is no evidence of a historical Jesus. But, that doesn't mean he didn't exist. Maybe there were many Jesuses at different times in the history of mankind, when we needed someone to wake us up. Maybe instead of calling them Jesus we could just simply call them Awaken.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his nonexistence.
None. I'm speaking in generalities. Secular people who believe in written history do not argue against his existence. Hell even the Jews don't believe in his resurrection which is why they still hold onto the original covenant and disregard the new testament. They still know he lived and breathed.
There is no evidence of a historical Jesus. But, that doesn't mean he didn't exist. Maybe there were many Jesuses at different times in the history of mankind, when we needed someone to wake us up. Maybe instead of calling them Jesus we could just simply call them Awaken.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his nonexistence.
What questions do you have that dispute His divinity?
None. I'm speaking in generalities. Secular people who believe in written history do not argue against his existence. Hell even the Jews don't believe in his resurrection which is why they still hold onto the original covenant and disregard the new testament. They still know he lived and breathed.