Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his existence.
You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his existence
You can believe anything you want to believe. I'm fine with that. But, I don't have to choose anything that you suggest.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is.
By divinity you mean the Holy Trinity, that is... God is nothing and everything? isn't why emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325? to affirm the full divinity of Jesus, declaring him to be of the same homoousios as God, rather than a created being. To me Trinity means God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. It is the weirdest idea I've ever come across in my life. btw, you can laugh all you wish, I don't care.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his existence.
What questions do you have that dispute His divinity?
You can believe anything you want to believe. I'm fine with that. But, I don't have to choose anything that you suggest.
By divinity you mean the Holy Trinity, that is... God is nothing and everything? isn't why emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325? to affirm the full divinity of Jesus, declaring him to be of the same homoousios as God, rather than a created being. To me Trinity means God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. It is the weirdest idea I've ever come across in my life. btw, you can laugh all you wish, I don't care.