This is just common sense right? A higher being creating us logically makes sense.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Why not the opposite? living-matter becoming non-living matter. How about this; All things in the Universe are just constant vibrations. All matter is just different types of vibrations. In other words all is counciousness.
Hunt and Schooler speculate that every physical object, including you and me, are vibrating and oscillating. The more synchronized these vibes are, the more complex our connection with the world around us, and the more sophisticated our consciousness. The “resonance theory of consciousness” they present posits that synchronized vibrations are central not only to human consciousness but to all of physical reality.
So is consciousness the creator? is there a super-consciousness many people call God? or maybe we are being created and re-created constantly, some people refer to this as a simulation?
Interesting position.
Because how could "not" have an opposite?
All implies whole; thing implies partial...things implies a sum of partials within whole. A sum of partials cannot made whole again...a jew suggests tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into believing that it can.
Constant implies "standing together"...applying vibration to anything standing together would shake each stance apart from one another.
If it's different from one another, then why type it together? Few suggest typecasting to tempt many together, which distracts from differences.
Con (together) scious (to perceive)...all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, thereby making differences perceivable. Few are conning (con) perception (scious) by suggesting many to join a consensus.
Likeness obscures difference.
a) Spec implies special aka apart from one another...every implies a collection of each held together. One cannot speculate about every (plural) without ignoring each (singular).
b) Physical aka phsy (to be) i (within) al (all) implies as partial within whole aka as essence (perception) within abstract (perceivable).
But there's a C in physi(c)al...because it's based on each being to SEE (c) or not to SEE (c). Those with eyes to see (c)...didn't fell for phonetic tricks.
Only within a current (inception towards death) can oscillation come into being (life).
...the less stable each VI(brating)BE(ing) becomes. Vibration implies holding onto one side while turning against the other; adaptation implies resisting the temptation of both sides (inception/death) from in-between (life).
Few suggest vibration to distract many from adaptation... https://genius.com/The-beach-boys-good-vibrations-lyrics
Com (together) plex (to weave) implies bondage for each ones free will of choice if joined like for example the world wide web.
Our implies holding in possession...being implies procession (inception towards death) letting go potential (life). Possession restricts potential if held onto.
Being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death)...few shape an inward circle (logic); which turns into an outward circle (reason) to tempt the minds of many into circular confinement aka the mythological ouroboros.
To be implies a different state from one another, hence within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unisex; universality aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (a game of puzzle) aka "there's comes a time when we need to heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one" aka globalism aka multiculturalism aka miscegenation aka melting pot etc. to artificially put together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).
It's ones consent to any suggestion by another which establishes the connection between slave (ones choice) and master (chosen one).
Re (to respond) son (sound)...sound/sanus (whole; entire; all) generates each instrument (mind structured within) by internal division aka motion (sound) > momentum (spectrum) > matter (instrument).
Few trick many with the articulation (word) of natural sound into an echo-chamber aka ones mind resounding the words suggested by another.
A word is shaped by putting letters together which implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape LETTERS together. Oneself represents the letter of each word shaped by another.
The letters are then shaped through an alphabet aka abecedary (abracadabra) into crafted spells to establish definitions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those who are deaf to phonics (sound).
Furthermore...it's the word (logos) which shapes the inward circle (logic) which turns into outward conflict (reason) among instruments.
ATION (action) generating reaction implies singularity. Reacting to pluralism (some; people) SIMULATES action. If you view others as a sum and yourself as part of a people, then your mind is running an artificial simulation of natural differentiation.
Being implies person (per sonos; by sound) aka a singular instrument within the singularity of sound. It's the mind of each instruMENT which can be instructed with pluralism (people) to deny singularity.