Templar crosses. An expression of papal loyalty.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (164)
sorted by:
Yes, and irrelevant, because lots of folks here nitpick and most don't get accused of being Jews on that account.
What I ask people about, re collectivism, is whether they mean to include all (or 99% of) men, women, and children. One take is "the children are guilty because of their indoctrination", one take is "the children aren't guilty but it's okay to charge 'the Jews' even though that includes the children". I think my approach, Name The Jew For Real, works better than either. It's funny how often people criticize the (imaginary) collective, I respond by criticizing individuals, and the interlocutor refuses to agree or take anything up or change anything. Perhaps you're not that type.
Thanks.
Now address the question I asked.
The answer and address was "Yes, and irrelevant, because" etc. I do try to respond.
I gave an implied question and you didn't respond to it. Directly: Do you mean to include all (or 99% of) men, women, and children?
Then ask it directly, if it exists.
Good. Where?
Yes. One example is Bobby Fischer.
I did ask directly.
Are you asking where shekel-sniffers nitpick? Lots of places, but I don't think that's what you're asking. For instance, the Talmud, where I like to pick on Rabbi Ulla (4th century); Tovia Singer; and Eitan Baghdadi.
Are you answering my question by saying you do mean to include 99% of Jewish children? What crime have they committed if so?
Here's a link to the whole permalink convo on one page.