The primary reason the Epstein material (limited as it is) was allowed to be released is because it is a form of intimidation. The satanic Freemason elite want you to think that they are infesting every nook and cranny of power: corporate, finance, government, media, NGOs, etc.
But we know that not everyone at the top of these structures is a member of that club, based on their warning years ago (Kat Williams warning about Diddy for example), and some that "made peace" with the pedos but never joined (Rosanne for example) who now complain after they were exiled for one reason or another.
Give me a fraction, based on your best guess, of how many elites at the top are really demonically influenced freemason pedophiles. I'm saying 1/5 maybe, and 2/5 are posers who go along to get along. My source? Hunch.
Another rule 1 violation, attack the argument not the person dude. Please be reasonable.No, there was no rule 1 violation. I did not attack the person. No words in any of those comments are attacking the person. I am not speaking about the person at all. *Why is the person allowed to refuse to defend its lying claims and refuse to answer any of the questions I asked.
Where is your identical reply to the comment with “I know your persona” in it?
Fuck off with this shit.
I don't see how persona is an attack and there are others ways to express your observations and arguments besides the way you did it, you made it an attack. No approval.
I do, however. If “your cowardice” is rule one, “your persona” is rule one. Delete his post and hold him to the same standard as me and I’ll remove the line from mine.
There’s not a SINGLE. FUCKING. WORD. in my comment that attacks the user. You cannot list the word. You can not give an explanation of how any of the words, in context, attack the user.
Directly speaking about the topic of discussion. Provide a direct link to it refuting a word I have said.
Directly speaking about the topic of discussion with respect to its inability to refute a word I have said, and the content of its comments made instead of doing so.
Referring to its behavior.
Directly demanding the user remain on the topic of discussion and only post about the topic of discussion, not post about other users.
Explain where the violation is.
I did think the cowardice part was the attack. It seems I was wrong on the God thing that I took to also be an attack so perhaps I'm just highly misunderstanding things today, I'm sorry. I'll approve and hope you can see this as a silver lining for me to be learning.