Note that rhetorical comparison to terrorists is not the same as accusing of terrorism.
Note that all other community questions on the subject proceeded without stickying because there was no active mod.
Note that your digression into theodicy is actually more fitting for a post at c/Atheist, but since it's your post you might get indulged here.
That said, I believe I had asked you to consider that if you were worldbuilding you would have choices to make about life and death. An author does not receive the same moral judgment for "killing" a character as a character has. The author controls the whole world and decides what the characters are, which includes their deaths, and they wouldn't be the same characters without those deaths. The characters however are culpable in their world for acting in ignorance of what is good for them and for killing one another thereby. If the worldbuilder is incapable of making a good decision about what a character's life should be, then there exists no good decision at all and we cannot act like our own decisions (being characters) are better; if anyone is capable of making a good decision then the worldbuilder is. The same is true for decisions about standards of behavior.
I really appreciate your being here and your memes are rather pointed insights about Christianity. You're following a track that many have pursued from exposure to deep theology through doubt, and you have two possible trajectories, either nihilism or peace. As long as you haven't resolved the tension between your moral standards and what you perceive as God's, you are avoiding that final choice. It's possible to choose either at any time, temporarily or permanently, and solve the tension, but while you complain that your standards are good but your creator's standards are not the tension remains.
I'm going to leave the sticky discussion between the two of you because unless something changes you get to face the same status the other discussions faced. Also, I should have pointed out that my record shows I don't believe in open-ended questions (here you have three options or implied "none of the above" or "write-in"). A community question should be binary, yes-no, such as current mod team versus changes, because otherwise results among three or more options can be gamed without indicating accurate consensus. The last question I posed had more votes in favor of new mod team (unnamed) than then-current inactive mod team, but was not heavily attended. So far yours is even less attended. This forum is rather like herding cats and resists changes to status quo. That's why admin took the steps it did.
When you learn to use logic the way others do instead of using it imbalancedly to direct results to what you already believe, then we can talk more about my supporting your bids.
This post is pathetic even by this boards standards
That's a conspiracy
MAKE ME A MOD.
I WILL DO NOTHING.
THIS IS THE BEST SOLUTION.
Chaos and anarchy do not stop those conspiring against us, it's what they hope for and try to orchestrate for our demise.
Yes they have. They have done so for months on end.
🤣
🤣
Negotiating with terrorists‽ Not a chance.
Your interpretation of facts is incorrect.
God is not a terrorist, He stopped the terror and will again, soon.
I have plenty of reason to find you highly suspicious, we both know I don't need 'physical' proof, where do you think you are?
Thisisnotanexist ✅️
Note that rhetorical comparison to terrorists is not the same as accusing of terrorism.
Note that all other community questions on the subject proceeded without stickying because there was no active mod.
Note that your digression into theodicy is actually more fitting for a post at c/Atheist, but since it's your post you might get indulged here.
That said, I believe I had asked you to consider that if you were worldbuilding you would have choices to make about life and death. An author does not receive the same moral judgment for "killing" a character as a character has. The author controls the whole world and decides what the characters are, which includes their deaths, and they wouldn't be the same characters without those deaths. The characters however are culpable in their world for acting in ignorance of what is good for them and for killing one another thereby. If the worldbuilder is incapable of making a good decision about what a character's life should be, then there exists no good decision at all and we cannot act like our own decisions (being characters) are better; if anyone is capable of making a good decision then the worldbuilder is. The same is true for decisions about standards of behavior.
I really appreciate your being here and your memes are rather pointed insights about Christianity. You're following a track that many have pursued from exposure to deep theology through doubt, and you have two possible trajectories, either nihilism or peace. As long as you haven't resolved the tension between your moral standards and what you perceive as God's, you are avoiding that final choice. It's possible to choose either at any time, temporarily or permanently, and solve the tension, but while you complain that your standards are good but your creator's standards are not the tension remains.
I'm going to leave the sticky discussion between the two of you because unless something changes you get to face the same status the other discussions faced. Also, I should have pointed out that my record shows I don't believe in open-ended questions (here you have three options or implied "none of the above" or "write-in"). A community question should be binary, yes-no, such as current mod team versus changes, because otherwise results among three or more options can be gamed without indicating accurate consensus. The last question I posed had more votes in favor of new mod team (unnamed) than then-current inactive mod team, but was not heavily attended. So far yours is even less attended. This forum is rather like herding cats and resists changes to status quo. That's why admin took the steps it did.
When you learn to use logic the way others do instead of using it imbalancedly to direct results to what you already believe, then we can talk more about my supporting your bids.
I never voted for you....I am voting against you though...ANYONE but this bitch and her ilk
Thisisnotanexit
I vote IAMTHEBEAST and demand we remove thisisnotanexit
Thanks for proving, again, who you serve.
Get rid of that exit bitch....she is obsessed and completely deranged and censorious