I noticed one interesting thing. In all english-speaking "alternative" media (!'m not even talking about official MSM) new war of US/Israel with Iran is heavily discussed. They discuss every possible development, discuss vulnerabilites of participants, discuss how participants could be defeated, but with one exception - noone discuss Israel in that ways. There are tons of hour long discussions and interviws and long articles, but none about how Israel could be defeated and destroyed, what vulnerabilites it have and where it could be struck with maximum damage.
And there is a lot to discuss. Strikes on desalination plants, killing top politicians, say all knesset or whatever, destruction of Dimona nuclear site, turning off electricity or destruction of Israel banks datacenters, cutting Israel from internet, strikes at all places of Satan worshipping in Israel and so on. There could be hours of discussions and megabytes of analitics. But there is none.
May be I missed something, if so, please point me to something of "Redacted" or "simplicius" views level where I could see a discussion or analysis of how Israel could be defeated and destroyed in this war.
Either all "alternative" media is under kikes control, either there is already full and complete internet censorship.
Arab states that surround Israel is not at war with Israel now. So it is senseless to discuss how they could defeat Israel.
Iran, on the other hand, is perfectly functional and one of the least retarded country of the world. Iran is one of very few countries who didn't buy all that NWO crap from the beginning. Even comparing to Russia or China who at least partially felt to NWO crap.
What was the purpose of this thread? For heaven's sake it was about how Israel could be defeated.
Wow
Iran is the least retarded of the middle eastern countries, but it's still retarded.
To confirm or disprove my point in OP that nobody in english-speaking internet want to discuss how Iran can destroy Israel.
You perfectly confirmed my point. Thank you.
lol
That's exactly what we discussed, specifically how they, or other nations, can't, unless they act in unison, which they won't.
And I think you have a wrongheaded notion of what "confirmation" means in practical terms.
So, you reject to discuss Israel vulnerabilities, locations of critical infrastructure, strategic places and so on. OK, I see.