I noticed one interesting thing. In all english-speaking "alternative" media (!'m not even talking about official MSM) new war of US/Israel with Iran is heavily discussed. They discuss every possible development, discuss vulnerabilites of participants, discuss how participants could be defeated, but with one exception - noone discuss Israel in that ways. There are tons of hour long discussions and interviws and long articles, but none about how Israel could be defeated and destroyed, what vulnerabilites it have and where it could be struck with maximum damage.
And there is a lot to discuss. Strikes on desalination plants, killing top politicians, say all knesset or whatever, destruction of Dimona nuclear site, turning off electricity or destruction of Israel banks datacenters, cutting Israel from internet, strikes at all places of Satan worshipping in Israel and so on. There could be hours of discussions and megabytes of analitics. But there is none.
May be I missed something, if so, please point me to something of "Redacted" or "simplicius" views level where I could see a discussion or analysis of how Israel could be defeated and destroyed in this war.
Either all "alternative" media is under kikes control, either there is already full and complete internet censorship.
You see examples of this from time to time. There is, of course, no accepted term for it, but I think of it as an "informational black hole". That is, somehow "They" steer discussion and analysis around an area. It becomes something that "it just so happens no one talks about".
(BTW, "They" =/= "Jews". It extends far beyond them.)
This is certainly not done by forbidding discussion, because that act literally gives everyone something to point at. It's more subtle than that, like being enveloped in a haze and trying to fight it. There is nothing to throw a punch at.
I have never studied the technique, nor has anyone else, but I do have some thoughts on it. I believe it's based on the fundamental human reaction of... reacting.
In this instance, look around and the vast majority of people live in an information sphere of their own creation. There is a flow of data: news articles, Instagram posts, offhand comments at the water cooler, etc, etc.
And what people do is--you got it--react to those things. Love, hate, agree, disagree, fear, anticipate, whatever. It does not matter, in this context. The "mode" is the matter.
What virtually no one does is to reach outside that information sphere, to ask the fundamental question, "What is really going on out there?" The goal is to build up a model of the world outside, not just by receiving information but actively seeking it out when discernment prescribes.
In this instance, discernment prescribes that one should wonder just what is going on is Israel. Gotta be something, right? You just have to go looking for what it is. And the mere fact that nothing came automatically down the pipe means there is probably something someone wants to hide.
I finally had to admit to myself that while that all seems so rational and natural and automatic to me, almost no one else seems to do that. They don't wonder what's going on "out there", in its totality. Their mode holds that if something is important, it will come to them.
So I think what's going on with control of both mainstream and alternative outlets is, to keep them from discussing that which should not be discussed, keep the pipeline filled with something for their audiences to love or hate. Doesn't matter which.
Around as in circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason)...a circle implies the beginning and end of a line put together aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
It's talking (articulation of natural sound into words) which confines thinking into circles.
Extension implies singularity aka cause extending into effect inwardly. A chosen one (singular) shapes they/jews/them (plural) to restrict the extension of ones choice outwardly.
Aka outwardly fighting (reasoning) the inward haze (logic). That's circular confinement aka kike/kikel (circle) con (together) trol (to roll).
Notice that an envelope is used to conceal a letter, and that ones choice LETS a chosen one artificially conceal what nature reveals.
If God implies everything, then throwing a punch at one another implies ones denial of God...that de-nial/nihilo represents "nothing".
Nature throws being apart from one another...beings tempt each other to turn against one another within artificial conflict.
Believing implies choosing to hold onto what another suggests, while ignoring to react (perception) to what nature enacts (perceivable).
If it's flow, then why is it called inFORMation?
Plural (people) restricts singular (person) reaction...nature implies singularity internally separating each unit of being from one another.
Only within motion can matter be modified...
Aka adapt to perceivable inspiration from within the confines of suggested information...the latter confining ones mind to think circular (logic) while turning against others (reason).
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka he (matter) that strives (momentum) with God (motion). Israel implies each ones struggle to live within the process of dying...not the jewish home within the levant/levare (to rise).
Right/reg (to move in a straight line)...everything (motion) moves each thing (matter) within a straight line (momentum)...a jew suggests a sum of things (something) to tempt gentiles together.
One (singular) cannot be a some/sum (plural)...only join together with one another, while pretending to be a sum like consensus; groups; bands; assemblies; collections; families; friends; nations; societies; civilizations etc.
Some hides all from one. How? All sets one apart from one another; some tempts one together with one another. The closer together; the less space to discern self as a part within whole.
Not both...singularity. Mainstream (inception towards death) lets in alternation (life). Life alternates in-between perceivable origin and suggested outcome, while in the process of dying.
A jew suggests dualism (both); progressivism (mainstream); alternativism (alternative) and escapism (outlet) to distract gentiles from singularity.
Singularity implies sound...a jew articulates natural sound into words to bind gentiles with spells. Any word is shaped by LETTERS aka by a gentile LETTING a jew shape...letting another contradicts singularity by establishing a dual bond.
Discussing together keeps one from discerning dis (apart) cuss (to shake)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/discuss
The word discuss implies analysis; a jew suggesting it to gentiles establishes consensual discussions aka a synthesis.