Throughout history, the countries with the smartest people has shifted from one ethnic group to another. Egyptian, Persian, greek, roman and chinese empires were all the most powerful empires in the world over the past 2000 years. They were mostly of different ethnicities and weren't white. Also the romans being white is just complete nonsense, the ancient roman historians described the romans having Mediterranean features in comparison to germans having western european features in contrast.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
For the sake of productive discussion me and u/MysteriousFedKnight are trying to clarify not only the definition but the intent behind what you are saying.
I previously said I thought you were saying that some white people think just being white makes them superior and I said I thought you were saying historically that hasn't been the case.
For my part, the only human superior to any other is Jesus Christ who is also God and through Him all humanity can evolve into the new man. Though that has nothing to do with being an industrious peoples, per se.
I have removed the derogation from him against you and now we are seeking common ground. Your help in this matter is appreciated.
This is exactly what I’m saying, specifically in the case of intelligence
Thanks for your reply. Adding u/MysteriousFedKnight
What even defines intelligence? Is it work output and empire building? Is it leadership and community forming? Is it dominance over others? What then is dominance? Is it the same thing as intelligence? I'm not so sure.
No definition relevated. And that is not any answer to my question. I see nothing resolutive there, just a guy avoiding a question, and another (i recognize, in good faith) not wanting to see what this is about.
I think what it is about is pretty obvious given 3 non answers by the guy.
So can he define what he meant by white supremacy, or do i have to fake satisfaction for an answer i asked first that was never given? i'm not going to pretend.
I never wanted any fake agreement. Can this guy answer a simple question about his own thread or not? We wasting time looking for fake agreements if he can't or won't.
He agreed that his idea of white supremacy is being of superior (intelligence) based on being white and he is disagreeing that that is correct.
I'm still trying to know what the definition of intelligence would be.
Edit: no, I am not looking for fake agreements either.