A repeated jewish suggestion to establish a consensus among gentiles. Why does that work? Because nature moves which allows repetition to accumulate. Why does it work on gentiles? Because gentiles ignore being moved by nature, while holding onto jewish fiction...
Funturistic, none of these indicate foreknowledge or narrative control. They are just random citations of two common terms, "six million" and "Jews", in close proximity. The people who compiled these took any such reference, including even one to $6,000,000; their cites "proved too much". When the stats were run with different numbers, it turned out three million had a higher correlation than six million. So this is statistically meaningless. There was nobody prophesying six million Jews would be killed in eastern Europe. Details, hoax #3.
Didn't the 1905 release of the Protocols include narrative control through media?
foreknowledge
Knowledge forwards being. All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies prescience.
just random
God implies justice, which isn't random (course without direction) by directed. Few suggest randomness to tempt many to ignore choice by origin for chance of outcome.
two common terms, "six million" and "jews"
Six/seco (to divide) and each chosen one implies unique...not common. Few suggest terminology to terminate many into common logic.
statistically meaningless
Choice within balance implies variable...suggested statism (static) and definitionism (meaning) tempt one to take measurements while ignoring balance given, which in return imbalances choice.
It's just sad. If half the conspiracies r true. Then what? It's ok? Terrible world. Jesus was right. And the other dude too. So sad.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fds8Q33nB0E
You may find this interesting.
A repeated jewish suggestion to establish a consensus among gentiles. Why does that work? Because nature moves which allows repetition to accumulate. Why does it work on gentiles? Because gentiles ignore being moved by nature, while holding onto jewish fiction...
Funturistic, none of these indicate foreknowledge or narrative control. They are just random citations of two common terms, "six million" and "Jews", in close proximity. The people who compiled these took any such reference, including even one to $6,000,000; their cites "proved too much". When the stats were run with different numbers, it turned out three million had a higher correlation than six million. So this is statistically meaningless. There was nobody prophesying six million Jews would be killed in eastern Europe. Details, hoax #3.
Didn't the 1905 release of the Protocols include narrative control through media?
Knowledge forwards being. All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies prescience.
God implies justice, which isn't random (course without direction) by directed. Few suggest randomness to tempt many to ignore choice by origin for chance of outcome.
Six/seco (to divide) and each chosen one implies unique...not common. Few suggest terminology to terminate many into common logic.
Choice within balance implies variable...suggested statism (static) and definitionism (meaning) tempt one to take measurements while ignoring balance given, which in return imbalances choice.