Thanks u/Plemethrock
We can have a discussion on whether or not free will exists. Discuss if every action we do is already predetermined by how our brain is wired, with the environment around us being the inputs.
We can also have a discussion on whether or not humans have souls and analyze the evidence for and against us just being our bodies
(I made an error and had to repost, apologies)
If one consents by free will of choice to any suggestion presented by another, then one shapes an argument against one another, while ignoring ones free will of choice.
An argument implies one side versus another side aka turning against one another aka binding free will of choice into imbalance instead of being free will of choice within balance.
The arguing mind (argument) represents the self inflicted conclusion, because one already concluded to choose a side to argue from.
Only in-between sides does one wield the possibility aka potential aka essence within all of free will of choice....choosing any side binds free will of choice to it until ones chooses to let go. Few suggest both sides of any argument to trick many into a dual/duel against one another called "reason".